Why Would Anyone Preorder A Console?

Recommended Videos

RicoADF

Welcome back Commander
Jun 2, 2009
3,147
0
0
NoGlobsGamer said:
When you can get a gaming PC capable of 1440 p for as little as $700 I don't understand why anyone would even buy a console to begin with.

One reason I can see is the price but with everything so much more expensive on console, and with the way you have to replace consoles more often than you have to upgrade PCs, and with all the great PC exclusives that are coming out and the way so many console games just get ported anyway, the only reason I can see to buy a console is brand loyalty or to get a particular exclusive you just have to play.
I have 2 pc's that can do that, and have each of the consoles. It's a mixture of wanting to play any game I feel like and not having to worry about platform and because consoles, frankly, can be less hassle alot of the time. After working in IT all day the last thing I feel like doing is coming home and doing IT support on my own PC, 99% of the time this isn't an issue but when it does happen I often just turn the console on and play something, dealing with the PC when I can be bothered.
 

BoredRolePlayer

New member
Nov 9, 2010
727
0
0
kiri2tsubasa said:
shrekfan246 said:
Hyena Slade said:
I just don't really see the point to preordering a console and was wandering if anyone could shine light on why someone would, or why they wouldn't.
If people don't adopt consoles early, said console won't get support from developers. The console will struggle and flop around for a year or two, before dying out and fading away. Now, I don't know if you're asking specifically about pre-ordering and aren't including buying within the first month or two of launch (since the systems are liable to be the same within that period of time), but it all comes to the same end: If you want to see more games on a system, there has to actually be people buying things on that system.

The people who wait for 5+ or 10+ games they'll love on a console before they buy are perfectly entitled to do as such, but they're not the ones keeping the console industry alive. If they made up the entire consumer base, every console made would be a massive failure. Whether that's a good or bad thing is fully down to personal opinion, but the fact remains that the console side of gaming props up a large amount of the software that gets released.
Holy cripes, GOLD STAR. Seriously, I don't wan to sound hyperbolic but I think you may be the very first person on this forum that actually seems to know how the world and business works. Hell it is the same with games. That is why I feel like crying on the inside when I see people here encourage people to not buy games at all outside of steam sale. If everyone did that, the gaming would likely die out.
Problem is that it's a chicken and egg thing, if there are no good games or incentive to buy a console at launch no one wants it. And if there no one is buying it no one makes games for it making it less of a reason. Look at the WiiU, there was no real incentive to buy a system where the big hitters were ports from other systems, so no one bought it. And now devs are saying no one bought it so why make games for it, while lying about saying no one wants to use the game pad while big name games are using iPads and Android Tablets to do stuff for the game outside of the game.
 

BoredRolePlayer

New member
Nov 9, 2010
727
0
0
Zachary Amaranth said:
Hyena Slade said:
What benefit or reason is there to it? Odds are you'll be getting the buggiest version of the console
People want the newest, shiniest thing. They are often either willing to gamble on hardware problems or lack the pattern recognition to figure it out. And honestly, I have no sympathy for either group when their toys break.
Problem is when you sell a device to someone it should work, doesn't matter if it's new or not. Also the ones who get it early also report the problems it has early enough to be fixed, so while you might not have sympathy for them they are the ones who get and yell about it's problems the most.
 

BaronVH

New member
Oct 22, 2009
161
0
0
rhizhim said:
Hyena Slade said:
This is a question that has been bugging me for a while now, and one that I can never seem to find an answer for.

Why would anyone preorder a console?

What benefit or reason is there to it? Odds are you'll be getting the buggiest version of the console, at the highest price (assuming it will drop in price), with about 10-20 games at launch that'll more than likely be on par with that you are playing on a current system.

I just don't really see the point to preordering a console and was wandering if anyone could shine light on why someone would, or why they wouldn't.
there was an experiment conducted in either america or the uk where the participants could choose after answering some silly questions if they wanted to have the money directly on their hands or by transaction, which would take 2 days to be completed but they would recieve 50 % more money as compensation.

somewhere around 80% took the cash right know instead of going for the more logical decision to just wait some days and recieve more.

in short, people are stupid.

TehCookie said:
Some people want to support it and/or play the games as soon as they come out.
kind of doesnt work anymore with the ps3 and 4
There is another reason: the value of the product now is worth more to them than getting it later with more cash. I would take the more money evey day, but if somebody sold me tickets to the Super Bowl for $250 and good seats, I would not sell them for $1000 and buy bad seats. The value of the good seat to the Super bowl to me is worth more than the money. On a strictly investment side if we are only dealing with money is the time value of money. I would wait in order to get more cash unless i could make more by taking it all up front and investing the difference. For gamers and pre-ordering the consoles, I think it is most likely that the present value of their 'toy' outweighs the risk of failure. Conservesly, you are correct in that many people do not rationally think things through and can only conceive of present time. I pre-ordered since the risk of it not being available prior to the holiday is greater to me than its risk of failure. My family wants it prior to the new year; therefore, it is not likely that the price will drop or an improved system will be released in that time. Also, I do not live from one paycheck to the next, so the risk is more of frustration than monetary loss.
 

Something Amyss

Aswyng and Amyss
Dec 3, 2008
24,759
0
0
BoredRolePlayer said:
Problem is
The problem is, when you live in a culture that vilifies consumer rights and insists upon the mentality of "free market, bitches," rewarding bad products only results in more bad products.
 
Apr 5, 2008
3,736
0
0
Pre-ordering guarantees availability on day 1, thus they will play before anyone else. The latest and greatest are always in high demand...just look at the insane people who camp outside Apple stores for new iPhones. Exclusive launch titles can also be a deciding factor.

There you have it, mystery solved.
 

Shoggoth2588

New member
Aug 31, 2009
10,250
0
0
A combination of "bragging rights", being an early adopter of new tech and, because they can. I wouldn't pre-order a console though since these past launches has shown that just about every retailer will have more than just the pre-order units. I got my Wii U on day one for example, without a pre-order. I had to wait in a line but I didn't have to pre-order anything.

I forgot about the other benefit of pre-ordering: Paying in small increments up until the item has released. Someone above (on page one) mentioned putting down a bit to pre-order then going back to put down little bits more up until launch day when the console is possibly already paid off. You still spent $400 - $500 but it's an easier hit to take if you spread it out over a couple of months.
 

razer17

New member
Feb 3, 2009
2,518
0
0
Why would I pre-order a console? Well, because I'm an adult, and I can spend my cash however I choose?
 

Something Amyss

Aswyng and Amyss
Dec 3, 2008
24,759
0
0
kiri2tsubasa said:
If people don't adopt consoles early, said console won't get support from developers.
Or, yo know, console makers could actually incetivise us to buy rather than gambling on mob mentality.
 

Something Amyss

Aswyng and Amyss
Dec 3, 2008
24,759
0
0
razer17 said:
Why would I pre-order a console? Well, because I'm an adult, and I can spend my cash however I choose?
You could also stick your hand into a garbage disposal. It doesn't mean people can't question why. So far you haven't addressed the question, but merely reaffirmed that you have the ability to.
 

Diddy_Mao

New member
Jan 14, 2009
1,189
0
0
My hit to miss ratio with consoles has been too high in the miss column for me to justify the price tag of a new console these days.

While it's true that my day 1 purchase PS2 is still alive and kicking and is supported by a staggeringly large library of good to great games.

My N64 and Wii justify their presence by simply keeping each other company in the closet while they collect dust in between semiannual bouts of playing the one or two games I bought and enjoyed for each system.

Thankfully I managed to avoid the ruckus of the early incarnations of the Xbox and 360 entirely and didn't pick those up until a year or two later.


So yeah, I can see the argument being made here. I didn't pre-order my PS4 for all the sane reasons a lot of people didn't.

The higher failure rate of 1st generation new consoles, the fact that a price drop seems all but guaranteed within the first year of release, and the fact that launch libraries usually have 1 or 2 really good games, but the rest is stuff that was pretty much developed for the previous console generation and pushed to the new one to try to drum up sales it otherwise wouldn't have warranted.

But early adoption has it's place too. An argument can be made that it is a form of investment. (If initial sales are less than promising game developers and the console developer itself may be less inclined to support it.)

Some folks simply don't want to delay their enjoyment of the one or two good games in the library, or they bought the system early as a gift, or some may see it as the price of admission to continue belonging to a subculture they are passionate about.

So yeah, I may not necessarily agree with their choices but I can understand and I certainly don't find it to be my place to tell them they're wrong.
 

BoredRolePlayer

New member
Nov 9, 2010
727
0
0
Zachary Amaranth said:
BoredRolePlayer said:
Problem is
The problem is, when you live in a culture that vilifies consumer rights and insists upon the mentality of "free market, bitches," rewarding bad products only results in more bad products.
Yeah because if no one had complained Microsoft would never have extended the warranties for the RRoD, because you know people rewarded how bad that was with a nice class action lawsuit. And if you hate how consumer rights are trampled so much why buy any software or hardware to begin with? Consoles sneak in the firmware updates that if you get this update you can't have a class action lawsuit against us yet you need to to use most of the features it has. And pretty much most software has that "you are licensing this not buying there for you do not own this software" crap all over it. And there seems to be talks about putting DRM on cars so they won't start. So yeah you can go "har har those losers bought there console early and it broke and the company fixed it and I can enjoy the new revision", yet those people were the ones who complained enough to get those changes.
 

TehCookie

Elite Member
Sep 16, 2008
3,923
0
41
CardinalPiggles said:
TehCookie said:
Some people want to support it and/or play the games as soon as they come out.

My dad pre-ordered the PS1 and PS2 when they came out (I was too young to have a job) and never had any issues and had fun with the games that were available. My family also used the media services a lot, even if it was just playing CDs and DVDs. As for the price, why do people pre-order games when it's going to drop in price? People want to own and play them and think it's worth full price.
Difference with the PS1 and PS2 was that there was no online functionality, therefore much less things to go wrong with it.

These days how many games launch with netcode problems, even low impact. And then consider that a console is considerably more expensive and vital to your gaming session. If your console is having problems, you can't play any of it's games.

Captcha says that I win, it's words not mine.
I agree which is why I stopped, but I thought that was my own personal bitterness to online. If someone trusts the companies to release a working console or that it will be patched later I could see them pre-ordering. Or some people aren't as aware of all the issues and think it will work like the previous ones.

rhizhim said:
kind of doesnt work anymore with the ps3 and 4
It works with every console. If I wasn't cheap when it comes to Nintendo I'd have a WiiU and be playing The Wonderful 101 right now instead of waiting for more games to be released and picking it up later.

Unless you mean the online/overheating problems, then yeah...
 

Psychobabble

. . . . . . . .
Aug 3, 2013
525
0
0
Because because .. why wouldn't they. Soooo shiny ... take my money TAKE MY MONEY!!!!!!!

Sadly mainly due to lack of both impulse control and purchasing savvy.
 

rob_simple

Elite Member
Aug 8, 2010
1,864
0
41
The last console I bought on launch was the Gamecube, and that was only because I loved my N64 and used to read Nintendo Official Magazine cover-to-cover at least once a day. Nowadays there are so many more gaming options available to me --especially now that I'm in control of my finances-- that there is literally not one single practical benefit to getting a new console on launch.

I think it's especially mad that people are getting these new consoles on launch when both Sony and Microsoft had widely publicised issues last gen with their debut models being prone to bricking (Microsoft moreso, but I understand Sony still had issues).
 

Something Amyss

Aswyng and Amyss
Dec 3, 2008
24,759
0
0
BoredRolePlayer said:
Yeah because if no one had complained Microsoft would never have extended the warranties for the RRoD, because you know people rewarded how bad that was with a nice class action lawsuit.
Of course, people didn't file a class-action lawsuit against the RROD, not that I can find. Oh, I can find several class-action suits for various reasons, but none that address the RROD. So your claim already falls flat.

People instead rewarded Microsoft by buying multiple copies of the same console. Microsoft was already working to fix design flaws, and that's the way gaming tends to work: rush to market, fix later. The only RROD suits I found were based on this and after Microsoft had already opted for a 3 year warranty for old consoles.

Oh, and they went nowhere. Microsoft was never pushed to action by a single suit I can find[footnote]regarding these specific problems; they've obviously been pushed to action by lawsuits in the past.[/footnote], much less an actual class-action lawsuit. And they won't be in the future, because gamers have signed away that right. Which makes the class-action argument even more impotent. What will they do with the PS4 for Xbone?

Well, pretty much what they did before: nothing.

Keep in mind also that when class action suits did come up, the gaming community at large attacked and berated users who would dare go after our console overlords.

Consoles sneak in the firmware updates that if you get this update you can't have a class action lawsuit against us yet you need to to use most of the features it has.
No, you misunderstand. All they need to do is change the terms of use. The whole "sneak it in in updates" thing is interesting, but they don't need to in order to do it. Case in point: Xbone and PS4. They didn't even sneak it in. It's boilderplate now, and people who bought these consoles have no excuse.

And again, by being willing participants, they have nobody but themselves to blame.

I doubt the Bone or PS4 will have the level of problems of the 360, but if they do have such problems, well, people signed on with no regard.

So yeah you can go "har har those losers bought there console early and it broke and the company fixed it and I can enjoy the new revision", yet those people were the ones who complained enough to get those changes.
For one thing, I would never say "har har, those losers bought there console early."

I don't know why they're buying their consoles there anyway.

And before I forget, I'll just add that the odds are against me getting either of these consoles, so trying to indicate I'm going to reap the benefits of their loss is utterly absurd. In fact, the new console generation was what really pushed me to finally update my PC so it could handle upcoming games. Whether these early adopters screw themselves is of little consequence to me.

You seem to be mistaking lack of sympathy with an outright attack or mockery of them. I'm not going to laugh because bad consumers get what they deserve for being bad consumers. That doesn't mean I'm going to be outraged at it, either. If you want something so bad you will buy it without reviews, or demonstration, or reasonable assurance, then you are gambling, pure and simple.

Even if you don't know you're gambling, you're gambling. And if you don't know it, you're a bad consumer. I don't get why I should feel bad for people who are throwing money around expecting quality despite all prior evidence.

I mean, look at it this way: every prior Playstation console and one portable had hardware issues at launch. Some worse than others, but only one got a class action suit and that was years after the launch. Both of Microsoft's consoles have had launch issues, neither of which ended in a class action lawsuit (of any relevance).

Why would any reasonable person assume that the new consoles were going to be different? This is a serious question, BTW, not a rhetorical one. Maybe there's a reason I'm just not seeing. But you haven't put forth a compelling argument yet.

But the reality, regardless of what should or should not be, is that this is what happens when millions of people rush out and blindly purchase a product. Companies assume a faulty launch run is acceptable, because the consumer has made it so.

And if you run out and buy on what a company "should" or "might" do, that's just foolish.
 

Something Amyss

Aswyng and Amyss
Dec 3, 2008
24,759
0
0
TehCookie said:
Unless you mean the online/overheating problems, then yeah...
He would have been better off pointing out the Xbone, where you need to download a patch just to play the games. The odds of playing the games day one are pretty slim. The PS3 and PS4 at least let you have the core functionality of playing your games (offline, at least) on day one.

But I think that's what he was getting at. I could be wrong, though.
 

Vareoth

New member
Mar 14, 2012
254
0
0
I was going to make a post about how I'll maybe pre-order the PS4 based on future potential. But now I'm just going to say I probably am getting one just to spite a couple of you considering how hostile some are about this...
 

StriderShinryu

New member
Dec 8, 2009
4,987
0
0
razer17 said:
Why would I pre-order a console? Well, because I'm an adult, and I can spend my cash however I choose?
Pretty much this. I pre-ordered the PS4 because I can afford it, I thought it looked like a good system at launch with some interesting launch titles (that I am not disappointed with in the least) and because I knew I wanted it but wasn't sure when stock would be available if I didn't get it at launch. That's pretty much it. Pre-ordering, for both software and hardware, is pretty much a personal choice.

I have nothing against people who choose not to pre-order, but it's quite frankly pretty silly to try to insult or villify those who do decide to pre-order. How they spend their money isn't your business and, shockingly, doesn't hurt you in any way.