Wii U Power Unlikely to Amaze, Says Miyamoto

Xanthious

New member
Dec 25, 2008
1,273
0
0
Mister Benoit said:
You do realize Nintendo never cared for power in ANY of their consoles or handhelds, yet have generally either destroyed the competition or at least survived (GC).

400-500$ is a ton of money to invest in a console for a fairly high amount of the market and Nintendo knows this. Just look how the PS3 has fared, it only started selling in decent amounts years after it was released and after price cuts that amount up to 500$(Highest cost launch PS3 bundle in Canada was 799.99)

Nintendo is going to do perfectly fine without you, tons of people will once again enjoy their games for what they are and the unique gaming experience they provide.
Destroyed? Really? Really? Up until they cashed in on the casual market with the Wii they enjoyed a solid decade plus in last place during the days of the N64 and Gamecube. If the Wii hadn't caught on and been such a fad with the nursery school and nursing home crowd they would still be floundering in last place trying to strive for anything that resembles relevance.

Let's be real, the SNES was their last home console that had any success with the hardcore gaming audience. Nintendo was left in the dust by a device partially of their own making when they abandoned the Playstation in favor of the trainwreck that was the N64. They continued to flounder with the Gamecube and the hardcore gaming audience still wants nothing to do with the Wii.

As it stands right now Nintendo isn't even competing in the same market as Microsoft and Sony. They have fuck all to do with the hardcore gaming crowd. You take away the elderly and housewives and grade school children and you've taken away the bulk of the Wii's audience. Those people won't be following to the WiiU most likely.

Nintendo will once again have to compete in a market it's failed to find any relevancy in since the days of the 16 bit console, the core gaming market. And just like the days of the N64 and Gamecube Nintendo will struggle to do anything more than suck hind tit as they are just now blazing their way into 2006 a scant half a decade too late.
 

Richardplex

New member
Jun 22, 2011
1,731
0
0
Personally, I think graphics in some areas need to stop advancing so they can advance gameplay and other important areas. shadows and lightning need to good for stealth-based games, and aesthetics need to be high for RPGs for immersion, but dark and dingy and brown modern games... not really. Games like Skyrim and Bioshock gain a lot from graphical upgrades... while games like BF3, while I might buy despite not being an FPS fan purely because it looks so bloody beautifully realistic, does not need the graphical upgrades

OT: this is too little too late, with Directx11 out, x-box saying the new console will be announced next year and the lack of multiple controllers to one console despite nintendo having pulled in the family/casual game crowd, there's a good reason why the word Wii is still in the name, it's going to same way. If this was released a few years ago, or released with the rest of the new consoles, this would be good, but its chosen one of the worst times to come out, in my opinion.
 

danyy2009

New member
Dec 6, 2010
60
0
0
Nintendo is going to do perfectly fine without you, tons of people will once again enjoy their games for what they are and the unique gaming experience they provide.
Unique gaming experience? Did Nintendo stopped remaking old games and making the same mario, zelda, kirby, metroid games with slightly diffrent numbers in the title?
 

Electrogecko

New member
Apr 15, 2010
811
0
0
hyzaku said:
Mr.K. said:
And I have a 2 foot snake in my pants, really I do.

Until we get some hard specs on this WiiU or some proper benchmarks I believe nothing anymore.
And that single controller limit is still dumb, you crippled the console for it's entire lifespan with that.
I have to agree. Any console should support at least two controllers and no fewer. Limiting to a single controller prevents any form of local multiplayer and that just seems the wrong direction for Nintendo of companies to take. Kind of hard to be family friendly when only one person can play at a time no matter what game you play.
There are still 4 Wii remotes, 4 Classic controller ports, and I don't think it's set in stone that the console will only be able to support 1 tablet controller.

OT: This is hardly surprising, and perfectly fine with me. If Sony and Microsoft decide to crush the WiiU in terms of power, how many devs are going to want to, or even be capable of taking full advantage of their hardware? I think devs can stand to NOT always make the most technically impressive games possible. Maybe then they could focus on useful and exciting things, like making games that don't revolve around centering a camera on your target with a right analog stick and pressing R, require a decent amount of mental involvement, or use a specially developed art style with a rich color pallette.....but, you know, I'm sure that extra power will lead to all kinds of new and exciting gameplay mechanics like it did on the 360 and PS3.......right?.......right?!
 

B-rad747

New member
Mar 1, 2011
32
0
0
I'm still a little skeptical on the Wii U. The big selling point other than the touch screen controller seems to be that it claims it's better than the Xbox 360 and the PS3. Is that really that big of a feat on Nintendo's part. Both consoles are five years old which is ancient in console years. I see it as kind of a desperate move on Nintendo's part to be the first to pull the trigger on the next generation of consoles. What I want to see is how it stacks up against what Sony and Microsoft have in store for the next generation.
 

coolkirb

New member
Jan 28, 2011
429
0
0
I still dont see why people are calling the controller a gimmick.......analog wasnt a gimmick..........the ds touch screen wasnt a gimmick....the wii remote still uses motion controls all be it more subtle, this controller isnt a gimmick and anyone who says so hates nintendo or is some kind of fanboy.
 

The.Bard

New member
Jan 7, 2011
402
0
0
Mister Benoit said:
You do realize Nintendo never cared for power in ANY of their consoles or handhelds, yet have generally either destroyed the competition or at least survived (GC).
That's a very... generous assesment of the situation. Handhelds are a totally different beast, so leave them out of this conversation. The wii "destroyed" the competition in sales, I'll concede that, but its software was atrocious and they abandoned the core audience entirely. The gamecube sucked wind, outside of maybe RE4. They released, what, 8 games PER YEAR for that thing? The N64 barely survived against PS1, and anything earlier than that I won't even count, cuz now we're going back 20 yrs.

400-500$ is a ton of money to invest in a console for a fairly high amount of the market and Nintendo knows this. Just look how the PS3 has fared, it only started selling in decent amounts years after it was released and after price cuts that amount up to 500$(Highest cost launch PS3 bundle in Canada was 799.99)
They should also know coming in for the HD party 6 yrs late for $300 is ALSO a ton of money when you're talking about redundant hardware. They're targeting gamers, and gamers already own a PS360. Which means they are asking us to shell out $300 (maybe more?) for a device that replicates what we can do on a PS360, but with NONE of the multimedia family-friendly functions, like dvd, bluray, etc. I'll give them the benefit of the doubt with their online system, but given that these guys are the ones who came up with friend codes, it will probably be the worst of the 3 at online play.


Nintendo is going to do perfectly fine without you, tons of people will once again enjoy their games for what they are and the unique gaming experience they provide.

I won't say they CAN'T succeed with this freak, but the factors are vastly different this go-round.

- The wii was shiny & new. Motion controls were unavailable anywhere else. They are touting the wiiu's hardware this time around, not a brand new way to play games. Smartphones are capable of replicating the kinds of experiences that little touch screen can give you.

- The wii was DIRT CHEAP. Nintendo has hinted several times this thing will be $300+. Not cheap anymore, especially when the PS360 have gone through several price drops in the last 6 yrs.

- Nintendo wants the core audience this time around. I can pay ~$400(+?) to play the newest Ninja Gaiden or Resident Evil on Wiiu... or $60 on my existing console. They flipped hardcore gamers the big ol' bird when the wii was raking it in, and they have NEVER shown an ability to keep 3rd party support anywhere above the "HIDEOUS" ranking. Now they are crawling back because the casual gamer well dried up. I won't say gamers WON'T come back, but it's going to be an uphill fight, and they need to show that they can actually get 3rd party support. Empty promises won't cut it so easily this time.

- The casual crowd is sitting this one out. The Wii made mad cash off of grandmas, nuns, the smelly old homeless guy down the street from me, and soccer moms. Then it gathered a ton of dust in their closets until their next soiree. These people do not care about improved graphics. They will look at that touchscreen, shrug their shoulders, and go back to their lives.

- Limiting it to one "ipad" per console. The Wii's success thrived off of party situations. If these "ipads" were stackable, so my friends with all their wiiu's could bring their touchscreen to my house and do a 4way "ipad" thing, they'd be on to something. But to have to pass it around, with one person getting the glory while everyone else suffers with sucky wiimotes? That's silly.

At the end of the day, they very well may succeed on their name and a bunch of people who don't care or know any better. But it will not be anywhere as simple as it was with the Wii, and they need to stop shoving their heads up their own butts when it comes to marketing.

And I STILL say this thing reeks more of Virtual Boy than "It prints moneeeeeyyyy!!"
 

The.Bard

New member
Jan 7, 2011
402
0
0
Xanthious said:
Destroyed? Really? Really? Up until they cashed in on the casual market with the Wii they enjoyed a solid decade plus in last place during the days of the N64 and Gamecube. If the Wii hadn't caught on and been such a fad with the nursery school and nursing home crowd they would still be floundering in last place trying to strive for anything that resembles relevance.

Let's be real, the SNES was their last home console that had any success with the hardcore gaming audience. Nintendo was left in the dust by a device partially of their own making when they abandoned the Playstation in favor of the trainwreck that was the N64. They continued to flounder with the Gamecube and the hardcore gaming audience still wants nothing to do with the Wii.

As it stands right now Nintendo isn't even competing in the same market as Microsoft and Sony. They have fuck all to do with the hardcore gaming crowd. You take away the elderly and housewives and grade school children and you've taken away the bulk of the Wii's audience. Those people won't be following to the WiiU most likely.

Nintendo will once again have to compete in a market it's failed to find any relevancy in since the days of the 16 bit console, the core gaming market. And just like the days of the N64 and Gamecube Nintendo will struggle to do anything more than suck hind tit as they are just now blazing their way into 2006 a scant half a decade too late.
Dude, I'm tempted to go back and delete my last post, because you just said everything I did in about half the space and with much more style & pizazz.

One thing you must admit, though, from a purely cartridge-console standpoint, the N64 *DID* destroy the cartridge-console competition... Colecovision & the 2600 ain't got NUTHIN' on the N64, BEEYOTCHES!!!
 

mjc0961

YOU'RE a pie chart.
Nov 30, 2009
3,847
0
0
I still don't see why people ever expected Wii U to play DVDs or blu-rays in the first place. Didn't anyone else pick up any sense of pattern recognition from the GameCube and Wii's disc formats that looked an awful lot like mini DVDs and DVDs but actually weren't to avoid licence fees?

Sober Thal said:
No internal Hard Drive right? Where are all the DLC and expansions of AAA games going to be saved? I never understood that part. Anyone want to alleviate me of my ignorance?
On an external hard drive, so you don't have to deal with Microsoft's expensive proprietary bullshit or Sony's backup/format/reinstall firmware/restore taking up your entire goddamn day bullshit-and that's only if it doesn't fail somewhere and you have to start the whole thing over again (I've done it twice, and hint: it likely will fail somewhere). No, if you want more space, all you should have to do is hook both external drives to a computer, copy contents from one to the other, plug the new one in, and bam, done.

Nintendo just won the whole storage thing as far as I'm concerned.
 

ryo02

New member
Oct 8, 2007
819
0
0
if its a bit more powerfull than the ps3 but easier to develope for it should be ok
 

Jacob Haggarty

New member
Sep 1, 2010
313
0
0
Mr.K. said:
single controller limit is still dumb, you crippled the console for it's entire lifespan with that.
woah woah woah woah WOAH... only one controller? Are you taking the piss? i Thought the whole idea was that this was literally a new controller, not a unique one-off thingy.

Well that sucks.

But i still have faith, so long as they fix this.... and don't lie.
 

Jacob Haggarty

New member
Sep 1, 2010
313
0
0
coolkirb said:
I still dont see why people are calling the controller a gimmick.......analog wasnt a gimmick..........the ds touch screen wasnt a gimmick....the wii remote still uses motion controls all be it more subtle, this controller isnt a gimmick and anyone who says so hates nintendo or is some kind of fanboy.
Really? you're just going to resort to calling "fan-boy" to anyone who doesn't share the same opinion as you? I'm a fan of nintendo, always have been, and even i have to say that it is a little gimmicky.

As much as i DO like the DS, the touch-screen WAS a bit of a gimmick. It was just incorporated quite well into enough games to be usefull. However, most games simply used it as a menu system, or just for selecting stuff on a list. Both are quite easily done with just buttons.

Also, of course analog wasn't a gimmick. Thats like saying "the power button wasn't a gimmick"... it holds as much weight as a wet tea towel.
 

Mr.Mattress

Level 2 Lumberjack
Jul 17, 2009
3,645
0
0
Xanthious said:
Destroyed? Really? Really? Up until they cashed in on the casual market with the Wii they enjoyed a solid decade plus in last place during the days of the N64 and Gamecube.
They actually weren't in last place (The N64 and Gamecube were 2nd and 3rd respectively). Your forgetting that Sega used to make consoles in the 1990's (Saturn failed to N64 and PS1, Dreamcast failed to the Gamecube, Xbox Original, and PS2).

OT: I understand Nintendo's always been about cutting costs, although I think the system should be able to use 2 WiiU remotes at once. However, I am betting it's not "1 WiiU Controller for your system, that's it". It'd be more like "1 WiiU Controller on at a time. If your first WiiU controller dies, then you can replace it". Also I am certain the WiiU will have kick-ass titles at launch (Unlike the 3DS), so it should get a group of people buying.
 

Awexsome

Were it so easy
Mar 25, 2009
1,549
0
0
Y'know I think that's for the better. If I wanted to take out a loan to game I'd get a PC.

We'll have to see just how much the 360 and PS3 step up their game to see how much difference there really is. If they can keep the third party multi-platform games then they should still do very well with their first party offerings.

People on this site like to complain about their first party games but, lets be honest, if you don't like Zelda/Mario/Metroid ect stuff then you have no reason to get anything Nintendo in the first place. If I can get all the third party games they're talking about like Assassin's Creed, Batman, and things like that and still get the awesome Mario, Zelda, and other Nintendo series games this console is looking pretty good.
 

YunikoYokai5

New member
Jun 16, 2010
100
0
0
mjc0961 said:
Sony's backup/format/reinstall firmware/restore taking up your entire goddamn day
I've got a good number of games/DLCs stored on my PS3 and I don't have to do this o_O If something goes wrong with my downloaded games I can just back-up the saved files, delete the game then re-download them. Small things like game saves go on the PS3 Back-Up 8GB USB I have. No problems.

OP: Well, I'm hardly surprised. The WiiU never really interested me to begin with and since then I've been hearing all sorts of news (The 1 WiiU controller per console being the heaviest smash I think). I'm actually beginning to wonder if the WiiU could even do all the things we were told it could do at the E3, and this is Nintendo trying to slowly break it to us that its probably on tier with the PS360, not miles ahead power wise.

Well (sits back and breaks out the popcorn) Just going to wait for more news to crop up and watch the launch...and the week after launch as well.
 

gigastrike

New member
Jul 13, 2008
3,112
0
0
It's not like we need much better graphics than the Xbox 360 anyway. Modern games already look great.
 

TheOneandOnly

New member
Jun 7, 2010
65
0
0
Motion controls, touch screens, and multiple screens? It could run at a billion frames per second and solve world hunger and I still wouldn't want it. *Fires up N64 emulator*
 

The_Emperor

New member
Mar 18, 2010
347
0
0
I seriously don't see where they were going with the screen in the pad thing. cheap is a good marketing strategy but the whole console just holds no appeal to me, it's almost like a step back.

the waggling thing was a gimmick but hell it sold, I mean taking the flailing away makes it lesser imo. now it's just a pad with a screen, which makes no sense to me, extra screens are not that cool. I know it has motion control built in but its not the same as the wii style control.

I'll applaud if they pull it off, maybe have the extra screen as a default tv and have the console take batteries or plug into the car so you can take it places, if they havent already mentioned that.

Otherwise how much functionality can it have? maybe they are trying to sell a hoarde of them while the xbox 620 and ps4 are in the works but I really don't see people going with it right now. This whole console stinks of dreamcast. I could be wrong though I'll have to wait and see.
 

chronobreak

New member
Sep 6, 2008
1,865
0
0
I don't get the one tablet thing. Nobody is saying to package the system with 2, and how much more money would they have to spend on the hardware to get the console to read and output the same thing to two controllers? I can see a lot of people, mainly who we could consider casuals, being pissed about it, as I don't think it's a thing that would be advertised. People will get the two cool-looking tablet controllers to play with friends and then find out it doesn't work.

It could also possibly be a strategy for reselling another version of the console down the line that actually supports more than one of the controllers. A Wii-U Slim, as it were. Maybe with actual substantial internal storage built in.