Wikipedia Tells Tecmo to Stop Editing its Wiki Page

[oppp7]

I think Rockstar does this with GTA 4. The page doesn't mention that a lot of people hated the realism (Pure Pwnage, Yahtzee).

Because the two people/groups you mentioned shouldn't be taken at all seriously - they are "joke critics"...

Which is strange, because I consider their opinions more accurate than most of the other companies.

Then I cannot take any comment you say about video-games seriously, or at least not with as much respect as I would people who can see jokes / cynics. Besides, "lots of people" (I assume you mean the majority) did not "hate" the realism of the game at all. In fact it appears rather the contrary is true.

But it's like Colbert and John Stewart compared to O'reilly and CNN. It's more entertaining and not much more invalid. I'm just saying from what I've seen a large portion of people thought GTA 4 was over rated.

 

[Pimppeter2]

I edit mt wikipage to make sure "believed to be godzilla" every friday. I mean just because its not true doesn't mean its false

 

[AceDiamond]

I thought all the companies edited their pages to make themselves look good.

I'm glad Wiki isn't taking their crap.

Wikipedia is too full of their own crap anyway

 

[Arsen]

I think wikipedia should allow certain companies the right to oppose slander in a sense.

 

[clericwithnolife31]

down with kerfluffle? the topic killer

 

[AvsJoe]

I'm surprised this is newsworthy. But go Wikipedia! Don't let anyone stand in your way of the quest for truth (or your version of it anyway).