Will there ever be a Zelda game better than Ocarina of Time?

D Moness

Left the building
Sep 16, 2010
1,146
0
0
RollForInitiative said:
RowdyRodimus said:
A Link to the Past was already better than OOT.
I'm with this one. I haven't particularly cared for any of the titles since Link to the Past. I suppose that's why I responded so favorably to 3D Dot Game Heroes.
Quoted for the truth
Every zelda that gets released i compare with link to the past. That game for me is what zelda games suppose to be. Ocarina of time looked great but it was far to easy to finish(except for the annoying MM the zelda games are getting easier and easier)

Link to the past the game get harder (and the dungeons bigger) the longer you were in the game (unlike twilight princess that got easier and easier after the water tempel(dungeon 3)). I will still play the new zelda game because i still like playing them and most have a nice storyline but i do not expect it to beat the snes game.

/edit also what i found VERY annoying in OoT is Navi "hey" "hey" "hey listen" shut up frikking feary
 

oppp7

New member
Aug 29, 2009
7,045
0
0
Don't know. I thought that TP came close due to the story, but I'll have to see how the others hold up.

And I played TP on the Wii. What's wrong with that?
 

TunaKing

New member
Aug 19, 2009
35
0
0
Zelda: a Link to the Past was a better game. The boss fights were perhaps better in OoT though.
 

ultimasupersaiyan

New member
Dec 9, 2008
457
0
0
OOT is the best Zelda so far in my opinion when you sum up all the parts but each game has it's great features when you look at it. Wind Waker has a beautiful and large world. Twilight Princess has a great story that's almost if not equally as good as OOT. Majora's Mask has a large array of fighting methods.Phantom Hourglass has... something... same with Spirit Tracks... OK I hated the DS games but I'm sure they have some great parts... maybe? The 2D Zeldas had challanging difficulty. And Skyward Sword has semi realistic swordplay.

One thing they have in common is repetition of plot because sometimes a story is so great it has to be retold so the younger generations can partake in the joy as well, without drastic change.
 

2xDouble

New member
Mar 15, 2010
2,310
0
0
chaos order said:
wow ur a little bitter :p
Only because A Link to the Past was better than Ocarina. But the OP specifically implied "since Ocarina", so... yeah. (get it? wordplay! woo!)

Plus, I'm mostly joking. lol
 

RedDeadFred

Illusions, Michael!
May 13, 2009
4,896
0
0
Wind Waker is my favorite Zelda game and is probably in my top 5 favorite games of all time.
 

Catalyst6

Dapper Fellow
Apr 21, 2010
1,362
0
0
Julianking93 said:
There already is.

It's called Majora's Mask.
Here's your answer.

As much fun as OoT was, there is nothing that compares to turning into a fish-man and gliding through the seas.
 

Nom Pretentieux

New member
Aug 2, 2010
155
0
0
Now? No.

The whole concept of the Zelda adventure games is awfully dated, and when they refuse to implement as simple innovations as a jump button, and are rather focusing on making it support the wii and its gimmick as much as possible, I see no way of that happening. OoT was groundbreaking at it's time in almost every sense as one of the first, biggest and most fluent adventure games in 3d. It requires innovation and hard work to top that feat, not waggle.
 

TLatshaw

New member
Aug 30, 2010
123
0
0
CitySquirrel said:
What an impossible question to answer. You can't guess the future in the absence of data. OoT was great, but obviously it wasn't some kind of so-perfect-straight-from-heaven game that there is no possibility of a better game being made. On the other hand, that doesn't mean the possibility will be actualized. Plus there is a huge issue of individual taste. What exactly were you hoping to discover from this thread?
Agreed. I think people are confusing "greatness" and "legacy." While they may often point to the same game, they're not the same thing. OOT is most definitely a "legacy" title for the innovations it brought to the Zelda series and gaming as a whole, but that does not necessarily mean it's the best Zelda game of all time. That is entirely up to preference. Personally, I have a soft spot for Link's Awakening.
 

Break

And you are?
Sep 10, 2007
965
0
0
Onyx Oblivion said:
There already were...your nostalgia just overpowers the greatness of the later Zelda titles.

Wind Waker and Twilight Princess are better in many ways, but especially in control.

Unless you were playing the inferior Wii version of TP, like I was.

The Gamecube version slams the Wii version to the curb.

Majora's Mask was about on par with OoT for me.

This is coming from someone with NO NOSTALGIA, who never owned an N64 or Gamecube, and played them all on his Wii less than a year ago.
I don't think the issue of Zelda is solely due to nostalgia. People who have memories of pre-WW Zelda games fell in love with the franchise when it was quite different to what Zelda is today. The games didn't used to be so afraid of the player getting stuck - the camera direction and level design of the newer ones makes sure that players don't spend half an hours wandering around because they're not sure what they can do next. You could easily argue that to be evidence of superior game design, but that philosophy is clearly evident in the boss battles, as well; I've been playing Majora's Mask again, recently, and despite knowing exactly what to do, I still found the Ikana Castle boss to be a bit of a handful. Compare with the bosses in Twilight Princess, which aren't so much fought as they are solved, as you use your latest tool in clearly telegraphed ways to stab their weak spot, then repeat the process two or three more times.

We'll never see another Water Temple because of this, and for people who liked the old games, those kind of moments were part of the charm. There's a lot that the new games do that's far and away superior to what people think of as the classics of the series, and there's a lot that people forget about the classics that's been improved upon by newer titles. Personally, I think that OoT, while it's influence and significance to the industry cannot be understated, has been somewhat superceded by games like WW or TP, in the same way that you don't need to play Red or Blue if you've already played through Diamond or Pearl. It no longer has the same impact as it did, because it served a very special purpose in the history of videogames.

Majora's Mask is still the best game ever made, tho'. Bitches be all, "Yo dude, if games is an art, then where's yo' Citizen Kane?" And I'm like, "Foo'! What was you doin' in the year 2000? We already got that shit!"

Cough. So to speak.
 

RowdyRodimus

New member
Apr 24, 2010
1,154
0
0
Fingerlicking said:
I'm still of the opinion that Links Awakening is the pinnacle of Zelda achievements.
That, along with the Oracle games, were all better than OOT. I've already stated that ALttP was the best, but these three GB games are all the runners up IMO.

Honestly, the only way a 3D Zelda can be better than these is if Myamoto and Peter Moleyneux team up and combine the stories of Zelda with the gameplay of Fable (just real them both men in a bit on their ideas) to create the ultimate video game fairy tale.
 

hippobu

New member
Sep 23, 2010
14
0
0
Better than OOT, yes.
A link to the past was better, Wind waker was better, TP was better, Link's awakening was better.
I don't really get why they said OOT is the BEST GAME EVER ! The control is weird, sound is average, graphic is ugly, story is ... actually it's very good. Except that it move Zelda to 3D and it doesn't really do anything.