I don't have any Star Wars movies yet (dad bought them all so I've just watched his since I'm still at home), but when the bluray comes out I'll grab them asap, I only get bluray if I can now adaysRanchcroutons said:Now that both of the trilogies are receiving the Hi-Def treatment will you be willing to buy the movies yet again? I have the original trilogy on VHS and the new one on DVD and I assume with each upgrade in home movie technology some of us have been re-buying these classics. George Lucas has even had talks about retouching his films with Real-D technology as well which would surely also see a DVD release when 3D tvs become more widespread. It seems that Star Wars fans are constantly having to upgrade to newer versions of the same six films in order to not feel outdated and left behind.
Awesome, thanks!Virgil said:You can get the original, unedited trilogy on DVD in this set [http://www.amazon.com/Star-Wars-Trilogy-Harrison-Ford/dp/B001EN71DG/]. It also includes the edited versions, but all three originals are included and on their own discs. (The reviews on Amazon are messed up, because all the different trilogy sets share the same ones, so don't trust them. I have that exact set, and I know it has the originals in it).CrashBang said:I've still got the original trilogy on VHS and that's the way I like to view it
Virgil said:Not unless the Blu-Ray edition includes the films as originally played in theaters. Which it almost certainly doesn't.Ranchcroutons said:Now that both of the trilogies are receiving the Hi-Def treatment will you be willing to buy the movies yet again?
It wasn't filmed in SD, it was filmed on film. Any film movie can be captured in greater than DVD resolutions, assuming the original prints are still around and in good condition. By going back to the sources they could have easily created a 1080p version.SL33TBL1ND said:But how would putting it on Blu-Ray make a difference? It's already been filmed in SD, putting it on an HD format isn't going to magically make it HD.
Of course, they probably already had one. I wouldn't be surprised if they created the high-resolution versions for the DVD release, and then scaled them down. Since the DVDs were released so late, it's no stretch to assume that they could see the HD writing on the wall.
There's also a huge difference in the sound quality on Blu-Ray vs DVD. It's actually even more significant than the video resolution upgrade, in my opinion. If you have a surround-sound setup, the audio on a properly-mastered disc is just phenomenal.
You can get the original, unedited trilogy on DVD in this set [http://www.amazon.com/Star-Wars-Trilogy-Harrison-Ford/dp/B001EN71DG/]. It also includes the edited versions, but all three originals are included and on their own discs. (The reviews on Amazon are messed up, because all the different trilogy sets share the same ones, so don't trust them. I have that exact set, and I know it has the originals in it).CrashBang said:I've still got the original trilogy on VHS and that's the way I like to view it
Yeah I see that now, with all the people telling me this. Thanks for clearing it up people.CrashBang said:Worked for Blade Runnder and Star Trek II, III and IV. They all look gorgeous on blu-raySL33TBL1ND said:As I said on the news thread:
SL33TBL1ND said:But how would putting it on Blu Ray make a difference? It's already been filmed in SD, putting it on an HD format isn't going to magically make it HD.
OT: I kinda want to because it's Star Wars in HD! However, every single time Lucas brings out the original trilogy in a new format, he destroys the artistic integrity of the films that little bit more. Things like changing sound effects, adding more cgi into certain scenes and switching Sebastian Shaw as the original Anakin's ghost for Hayden Christenesen! This is not something I can forgive. So no. I've still got the original trilogy on VHS and that's the way I like to view it
D'awww you beat me to it!Virgil said:Not unless the Blu-Ray edition includes the films as originally played in theaters. Which it almost certainly doesn't.Ranchcroutons said:Now that both of the trilogies are receiving the Hi-Def treatment will you be willing to buy the movies yet again?
It wasn't filmed in SD, it was filmed on film. Any film movie can be captured in greater than DVD resolutions, assuming the original prints are still around and in good condition. By going back to the sources they could have easily created a 1080p version.SL33TBL1ND said:But how would putting it on Blu-Ray make a difference? It's already been filmed in SD, putting it on an HD format isn't going to magically make it HD.
Of course, they probably already had one. I wouldn't be surprised if they created the high-resolution versions for the DVD release, and then scaled them down. Since the DVDs were released so late, it's no stretch to assume that they could see the HD writing on the wall.
I'm interested in this, and actually wouldn't mind buying it to hear the difference.There's also a huge difference in the sound quality on Blu-Ray vs DVD. It's actually even more significant than the video resolution upgrade, in my opinion. If you have a surround-sound setup, the audio on a properly-mastered disc is just phenomenal.
Basically, this.SL33TBL1ND said:As I said on the news thread:
SL33TBL1ND said:But how would putting it on Blu Ray make a difference? It's already been filmed in SD, putting it on an HD format isn't going to magically make it HD.
It turns out it does make a difference. Who knew?YawningAngel said:Basically, this.SL33TBL1ND said:As I said on the news thread:
SL33TBL1ND said:But how would putting it on Blu Ray make a difference? It's already been filmed in SD, putting it on an HD format isn't going to magically make it HD.