good, im hoping to see the warships succeed.
You mean what War Thunder fails to do. War thunder is better with its aircraft but thats about it. Its tanks are aboslute ass unless you want simulator ranther than a fun game.TK MadCat said:Eh, so 3 games to play what War Thunder does in 1. Color me unimpressed with Wargaming. Admittedly it seems they have beat Gaijin, time-wise, for sea combat...but I can wait. Tried both WoT and WoP, and they feel clunky in comparison. Plus when I get tired of my P-51, and feel like rolling over to tanks, I need to boot up a different game to do so.
Nope, War Thunder ftw.
NoX 9 said:Am I alone in having played NavyField? Or doesn't anyone else feel like WoWs is just everything NF2 should have been. The gameplay feels very similar to the original NF in my experience; it looks and feels just like I expected a 3D NF to look! Carrier combat in particular is extremely similar; the gameplay certainly is interesting, but not as original as some may think.
They really nailed it with WoWs though, it's a great game. I was lucky enough to get access to the closed BETA, and it really is as good as the hype wants you to believe. Seems like Wargaming really REALLY didn't want to repeat the disaster that was WoP!
Hah, they are not useless, they dont see the problem. Gaijim wants its tanks to be with historical specifics - this leaves them extremely unbalanced. They also want realistic maps - which means boring gameplay.TK MadCat said:but Gaijin is just so bad at certain very important things... Vehicle balancing and map design for example... They are uselss at that.