syndicated44 said:
In 2013 talks start to break down between China and the US. The UN tries its best to mediate but it is beyond repair. China calls in the debt, America refuses to pay. US still having its hands in the middle east starts to pull troops to protect borders and moves warships outside of China. Talks continue in the UN. While China moves ships outside of Canada and West coast.
Okay, realistically, China would never start a war in the first place, ESPECIALLY with the US. It would be too detrimental to China economically, since a shift in production from consumer goods to military goods would mean a massive loss of resources, as well as the loss of exports that keeps the Chinese economy afloat. Not to mention Mutually-Assured Destruction, which practically forces talks. Also, there is difference between private debt and sovereign debt. China cannot just "call in" the debt owed by the US.
syndicated44 said:
2014: A series of missiles hit and destroy US ships outside of China. War is declared. Within the first 72 hours China has invaded Canada and within a week are on US soil while US has failed to make much impact into Chinese Land. UK does its best to stay out of conflict.
Who exactly declares war on who? And why the fuck would China invade Canada, a country that's pretty much a logistical impracticality as well as holds little to no significant tactical advantage? And, in the process, risk aggravating the Russians? Or are you just copy-pasting the Fallout scenario?
syndicated44 said:
Russia moves into Middle East after US are gone. Iranian and Russian forces soon take control of much of Middle East while NATO moves in to stop the invasion. China bombards west coast while holding a few key locations. US pleads with Japanese help with war effort. North Korea conquers South Korea. Japan refuses to help in fear of invasion.
Lol, what the fuck does Russia want in the Middle East? The only thing the Middle East is to Russia is a weapons market and an oil-source competitor. And if you thought the US military was unprepared to occupy Iraq, Russia is quite frankly a cluster fuck waiting to happen. I could imagine China trying to invade the Middle East from Xinjang, though, to fuel it's rapid industrialization, since they're relatively close.
syndicated44 said:
China uses Cuba for staging air attacks. Florida is carpet bombed and is soon given up. US pulls forces from China to help protect home front. Warships pulled from China wipe out Chinese ships on West Coast. Korea has constant fighting and a Guerrilla force steals and launches a nuclear missile on their own country. Missile is detected by satellites, China, US, and Russia prepare to launch a nuclear strike. No country except Korea is hit and no other missile is launched.
Really? Lol, China could honestly give 2 shits about using a fledging socialist nation with an economy that's practically in free-fall since the US embargo. China has nukes, Ffs.
As for North Korea, I would imagine they would last a week, maybe two, at most a month, against a combined S. Korea/US force alone. Although god knows that the Chinese have been backing up N. Korean since the 1950s and that the loss of N. Korea as a buffer zone with the US military would be an unacceptable defeat to them. The Korean campaign would probably amount to the Allied Italian-invasion campaign of WW II.
syndicated44 said:
2015: China takes New York while being driven out of California. NATO troops are pulled out of Middle East after colossal losses. Russia sends troops from China and make a push for US. UN starts to break apart.
Rofl, how the fuck would even China get into NY? And in the first place, why NY? NY is a financial center, not a production center like Chicago, Detroit, Texas or California, and could easily be replaced by the London SX, and thus has little to no strategic bearing, other than a morale defeat. And even then, NY is practically on the other side of the world. California is plausible.
-snip-
The only thing I'm going to say is that WW III will not be started between sovereign nations; nations have too much lose from war, economically and politically. You want proof? Just look at the Iraq Occupation and the difference between the US at 2000 and the US as 2008.
Imo, WW III will be started by intranational paramilitary groups such as the Taliban, and it's going to begin with a terrorist attack, a la MW2 "No Russian".