World war one games

Recommended Videos

Souplex

Souplex Killsplosion Awesomegasm
Jul 29, 2008
10,308
0
0
As anyone who has ever looked at upcoming games lists knows, there are a lot of world war two games. I figure that dubya dubya uno had more of a global impact and there should be more recognition of it.

Do you know of any WWI games?
Do you have any ideas as to why WWII games are so prevalent but WWI games are not?
Discuss!
 

Katana314

New member
Oct 4, 2007
2,299
0
0
1. No, except for a Half-Life mod called The Trenches.
2. WW1 was a bunch of guys sitting in trenches unsure of how to win. You attack their side. They shoot you. You retreat. They attack your side. You shoot them. They retreat. You throw poison gas in their trench. They die. They throw poison gas in your trench. You die.

A WW1 game would consist of you watching a field motionlessly for hours, then falling flat on your face in mud once in a while, then every week digging out more of your trench.
 

shatnershaman

New member
May 8, 2008
2,627
0
0
No
Its more fun with a semi-auto/full auto weaponry than all bolt action/likes to jam every shot.

I want more but of course It would be like the Civil War game.
 

LOOY

New member
Apr 14, 2008
132
0
0
WW2 games allow for more "modern" combat, you can use SMGs, snipers, bazooka's etc.
WW1 everyone just sat in a shit hole taking random pot shot's at each other and every now and again they all charged machine gun positions with bayonets. It probably wouldn't make for fun gameplay, everyone would be using bolt action rifle's etc.
 

Souplex

Souplex Killsplosion Awesomegasm
Jul 29, 2008
10,308
0
0
Also first war with planes. First war with zeppelins (Were they used in two?) First war with tanks. The technology was new and interesting but still in need of refinement.
 

LisaB1138

New member
Oct 5, 2007
243
0
0
This is why:

Dulce et decorum est by Wilfred Owen

Bent double, like old beggars under sacks,
Knock-kneed, coughing like hags, we cursed through sludge,
Till on the haunting flares we turned our backs,
And towards our distant rest began to trudge.
Men marched asleep. Many had lost their boots,
But limped on, blood-shod. All went lame, all blind;
Drunk with fatigue; deaf even to the hoots
Of gas-shells dropping softly behind.

Gas! Gas! Quick, boys! An ecstasy of fumbling,
Fitting the clumsy helmets just in time,
But someone still was yelling out and stumbling
And floundering like a man in fire or lime.
Dim through the misty panes and thick green light,
As under a green sea, I saw him drowning.
In all my dreams, before my helpless sight,
He plunges at me, guttering, choking, drowning.

If in some smothering dreams, you too could pace
Behind the wagon that we flung him in.
And watch the white eyes writhing in his face,
His hanging face, like a devil's sick of sin;
If you could hear, at every jolt, the blood
Come gargling from the froth-corrupted lungs,
Obscene as cancer, bitter as the cud
Of vile, incurable sores on innocent tongues,
My friend, you would not tell with such high zest
To children ardent for some desperate glory,
The old Lie: Dulce et decorum est
Pro patria mori.


WWI was a very nasty business. As the previous poster said, it was not a "good fight."
 

shatnershaman

New member
May 8, 2008
2,627
0
0
RAKtheUndead post=9.70289.686643 said:
Not necessarily! World War I was more dynamic than you'd think. It was more about shelling the crap out of each other, which cleared the trenches and allowed soldiers to move forward. Trench charges were uncommon after the first couple of years, then tanks and stormtroopers made the last year a lot more dynamic than you'd believe.
No Kursk,no Nuke,No SMGs (Close by a few years but no),No Fun Tanks (JagdTiger Woo!),Trench Foot pwned more than bullets in WW1.
 

LordCraigus

New member
May 21, 2008
454
0
0
RAKtheUndead post=9.70289.686735 said:
I don't think there's a game developer around that could portray the First World War accurately.
Then again, there's not a huge amount of developers that have attempted, let alone succeeded, in doing that with the Second World War either.

Definitely though, when it comes to the sort of combat involved, the First World War was a lot different than most people think/are taught.
 

Solo508

New member
Jul 19, 2008
284
0
0
WW1 was mainly trench warfare, not that it wouldn't work as a game but it is limited in that way.
 

The Iron Ninja

New member
Aug 13, 2008
2,868
0
0
shatnershaman post=9.70289.686937 said:
Knight Templar post=9.70289.686933 said:
You shoot, I shoot nobody moves for a year. Fun.
Well there was a game of "footy" at Christmas.
That would make a very intelligent and thought provoking game. Spend most of the game shooting at someone and then near the end have a friendly soccer match, get to know them all by name, then spend the last mission shooting them in the face as you storm their trench.
It would be like if in Halo a grunt offered you a lollypop just before you hit it in the face with the butt of your rifle. You would feel so bad.
 

TheNewBain

New member
Sep 2, 2008
3
0
0
I think the reason that there are not many WWI games is because WWI was fought mostly in trench warfare which is very boring. There's a lot of sitting around, random shooting, and charging to your death which doesn't exactly make for great game play.
 

Eyclonus

New member
Apr 12, 2008
672
0
0
Try having the ANZACs at Gallipoli, being told to jump off the boats and line up on a big open beach which was said to be clear of defences, except the British cocked up the landing and the ANZACs landed in a thin strip of beach with Machine Guns on the overlooking cliffs.

EDIT: With those magical ANZAC biscuits that regenerate health and give your character model Super Sayian appearance...
 

shatnershaman

New member
May 8, 2008
2,627
0
0
Eyclonus post=9.70289.686981 said:
Try having the ANZACs at Gallipoli, being told to jump off the boats and line up on a big open beach which was said to be clear of defences, except the British cocked up the landing and the ANZACs landed in a thin strip of beach with Machine Guns on the overlooking cliffs.
But WW2 has a bigger well known version called D-Day.
 

The Iron Ninja

New member
Aug 13, 2008
2,868
0
0
shatnershaman post=9.70289.686991 said:
Eyclonus post=9.70289.686981 said:
Try having the ANZACs at Gallipoli, being told to jump off the boats and line up on a big open beach which was said to be clear of defences, except the British cocked up the landing and the ANZACs landed in a thin strip of beach with Machine Guns on the overlooking cliffs.
But WW2 has a bigger well known version called D-Day.
How did the british cock up D-day? Besides, ANZACs need their own game.
 

Eyclonus

New member
Apr 12, 2008
672
0
0
Ahh but what percentage of losses did they have at D-Day?

Actually it wouldn't be trench warfare when the British deploy the Mark Is, and the Germans roll out the A7Vs,then its trench warfar against tanks!!!
 

shatnershaman

New member
May 8, 2008
2,627
0
0
The Iron Ninja post=9.70289.687001 said:
How did the british cock up D-day? Besides, ANZACs need their own game.
Well the landing ships/tanks. I thought it was for a bloody mess on a beach. For cocking up look at Dieppe.

Eyclonus post=9.70289.687003 said:
Actually it wouldn't be trench warfare when the British deploy the Mark Is, and the Germans roll out the A7Vs,then its trench warfar against tanks!!!
Then its tin can v tin can

Which would you rather be in?


 

The Iron Ninja

New member
Aug 13, 2008
2,868
0
0
All the arguments against games in the first world war are that 'you'll just be standing in one spot shooting at targets as they pop out ages away'. That doesn't sound to different from what some players in games like counter strike already do anyway, and how succesful was counter-strike?

Also, you would be standing in one place, there was alot more movement in world war one than people think. Then there's the whole naval and air battles too.

Edit: And Shatnershaman? let's not turn this into a thread about WW2, we already have enough of those.