It was supposed to be something completely different from the first Half-Life and it did what it did really well.dylanmc12 said:HL2 : Whatever happened to the fast paced interesting puzzle neat platforming-y-ness of the first game?
It was supposed to be something completely different from the first Half-Life and it did what it did really well.dylanmc12 said:HL2 : Whatever happened to the fast paced interesting puzzle neat platforming-y-ness of the first game?
Lies. 3D Sonic games were never "pretty good." "Mediocre at best with some fun moments hampered by horrendous design choices" would be a more accurate descriptor.Decabo said:Sonic the Hedgehog 2006. Up until that point, 3D Sonic had been pretty good.
Lies. The first two Sonic Adventures were very well recieved, 86 and 89 on Metacritic respectively. I enjoyed them immensely.Carlos Alexandre said:Lies. 3D Sonic games were never "pretty good." "Mediocre at best with some fun moments hampered by horrendous design choices" would be a more accurate descriptor.Decabo said:Sonic the Hedgehog 2006. Up until that point, 3D Sonic had been pretty good.
Though Sonic '06 was terrible even by 3D Sonic game standards. Good lord.
Yes, it does, but I still found it really boring. You have to sit in a room for several hours whilst NPC's Yack on about "Political" issues and "Civil Protection." Say what you want, I found the game really boring.Mr.Amakir said:It was supposed to be something completely different from the first Half-Life and it did what it did really well.dylanmc12 said:HL2 : Whatever happened to the fast paced interesting puzzle neat platforming-y-ness of the first game?
Well apparently youre in a rare breed of opinion for the series. Back in the early 2000's Capcom only really listened to its Japanese fanbase, and from what i can gather, close to no-one liked Resident Evil's[footnote]Its called Biohazard in Japan.[/footnote] story. So they changed it and it became the poster child for they saying;Silent Biohazard Solid said:Well, I don't care about Capcom's 'track record'. I genuinely liked the storyline in the first few RE games.gigastar said:You do know that Capcom makes stories like a washing machine would bake cakes, right?
Anyway, ignore the horrible story and what you have is a damn good game to play.
It was my favorite franchise, and I was keeping up with the storyline pretty closely. And RE4 completely changed the way I looked at the artificial universe that they created with RE1, 2, 3 etc. It made me see the characters, the world they live in completely differently, in a bad way.
It takes more than gameplay and graphics to make a game enjoyable for me. Of course, even the gameplay doesn't resemble anything close to what Survival Horror should be. You don't need to conserve ammo, or resources, because there's always plenty. And frankly, no part of it was scary. It's a nice "action shooter". And even if those are just nitpicks, the storyline is by far the biggest factor that made me give up on the series.
I think you're the first person I've ever heard who's played Sonic CD say anything other than it was the best Sonic ever, really refreshing change. I don't think it's the worst Sonic game but I don't like it nearly as much as Sonic 1, 2, or 3+K.Carlos Alexandre said:Sonic CD. It's a game with almost laughably bad level design/flow, graphics that are less impressive than Sonic 1 (despite coming out between Sonic 2 and 3), ho-hum music (either soundtrack), and, for some reason, a stupidly insane amount of fanboy love. Puzzling and frustrating.
Neither review scores nor your personal preference changes anything I just said.Decabo said:Lies. The first two Sonic Adventures were very well recieved, 86 and 89 on Metacritic respectively. I enjoyed them immensely.
It was pretty terrible, but I am going to have to go with Gran Turismo 5 or Killzone 3. Both absolute fails, which just did nothing but make the series worse.Drummie666 said:Other M.
Metroid is dead.
gigastar said:Well apparently youre in a rare breed of opinion for the series. Back in the early 2000's Capcom only really listened to its Japanese fanbase, and from what i can gather, close to no-one liked Resident Evil's[footnote]Its called Biohazard in Japan.[/footnote] story. So they changed it and it became the poster child for they saying;
'Even a shit series can be good, if only briefly[footnote]Added after RE5.[/footnote]'
I do understand what you mean about the survival horror bit though. I always thought that after RE4 it was mislabelled as survival horror where it should have been an over-the-shoulder TPS. With zombies.
Yes, it does. You said the games were poorly designed. If the games were widely enjoyed and well recieved by critics, then the design did what it was trying to do. That's what's called good design.Carlos Alexandre said:Neither review scores nor your personal preference changes anything I just said.Decabo said:Lies. The first two Sonic Adventures were very well recieved, 86 and 89 on Metacritic respectively. I enjoyed them immensely.