Don't worry. I generally don't like Mario games. But Banjo Kazooie is great!TheGreenManalishi said:
Worst Video Game Port?
- Thread starter Gado911
- Start date
Every Quake port ever made. The first two were ported to consoles, and failed because people didn't know how to make FPSes work on a console yet.
Quake III was ported to the PS2. A game about online multiplayer was ported to a console which, at the time, had no online functionality. Who could possibly have thought this was a good idea?
Quake 4 on 360 was just horribly optimised, laggy, and buggy. It was optimised about as well for the 360 as Crysis was for a PC that wasn't owned by NASA.
Quake III was ported to the PS2. A game about online multiplayer was ported to a console which, at the time, had no online functionality. Who could possibly have thought this was a good idea?
Quake 4 on 360 was just horribly optimised, laggy, and buggy. It was optimised about as well for the 360 as Crysis was for a PC that wasn't owned by NASA.
Banjo Kazooie was good because it was less complicated than DK64, but was a bit more fleshed out in terms of gameplay than SM64Onyx Oblivion said:
Well, I didn't own an N64, or any Nintendo console that wasn't handheld. So, I missed out on anything that wasn't ported. Even that Zelda game. Macarena of Space..TheGreenManalishi said:
I ended up getting SR2 for the pc on a whim when it was released. It was the worst PC game experience I've ever had. My PC isn't that great but it can run Fallout 3 with everything maxed out, yet SR2 ended up looking like a PS1 game and if that wasn't bad enough, when driving the FPS would drop into single digits making 85% of the game unplayableGado911 said:
In the end I ended up rebuying the game for the 360 to fully enjoy it
Arcana Heart 2 is one of those mysterious arcade games that got a recent PS2 port. The port was pretty bad: the sprites looked like ass, the framerate dipped below 10FPS at times and so forth. It's pretty damning considering that the game is a 2D fighting game and that for some mysterious reason the game runs far better emulated... on a PC (solid 60fps, by the way).
Saints Row 2 on the PC is pretty bad too but it has been mentioned already.
Saints Row 2 on the PC is pretty bad too but it has been mentioned already.
You played/seen the Sega Saturn version of the original Quake? It's hilarious since it doesn't even use the Quake engine.Anachronism said:
I have to say Resident Evil 4 for the PC. It had no mouse support whatsoever, god knows why. The onscreen buttons (for quicktime events and tutorials and the like) were just circles with numbers in it. I had to look that number up in the controls menu, try to remember it, and repeat said quicktime event. In the end, I just said "Fuck it" and I plugged in my USB controller I had sitting around, and that worked like a charm.
I have. Talk about bizarre.Woe Is You said:
My worst port would be Double Dragon on the C64. Atari/Melbourne House couldn't find a way in the time they had to develop it to join the top half and bottom half of the main character sprites. Rumour has it that they had to ship a printed apology in the game box.
Really bad coding. And I'm not talking about bad coding like how GTA4 had bad coding(extremely high pc speecs so you could run it). I'm talking about bad coding as in "it made the game unplayable". Apparently thye fixed some of the worst bugs with a patch, but never tried it with the patch. Games like that should not be released without proper testing.Zeeky_Santos said:
Man! Can't believe someone actually mentioned that one before I could. But yes, this.Zyconis said:
Chrono Trigger for the PS1 slower than the original, and its sound loaded slowly no matter what console or disk i tried >.>