Not particular bothered if it did but I do own as PS3 and we guys have had Call of Duty: Future Warfare for a while now under the title of Killzone 2.
Would you play Call of Duty Future Warfare?
- Thread starter Zeema
- Start date
'Future' is a good concept, but the deliverance (not the film) of such a idea could go terribly awry. I mean, a future warfare could be excellent, but people don't want a Sci-Fi game coming out. I think a reasonable 'Call Of Duty: Future' would be a game taking place only 20-50 years from now. The COD series doesn't need laser guns or plasma grenades, or hover tanks (We've already done such with the Halo series and the next 20 or so shooters released since). The advantage to a future game is one where you can create a ORIGINAL concept that isn't: USA = Good, Every Country In East = Bad (GOD FORGIVE Infinity Ward's writers). I'd love to see a Future COD where your getting to use and operate prototype weapons now, that COULD be functional THEN. Maybe have new items like motion sensors that track the vibrations on only the surface they're attached to, walls, ceilings, floors. Toss in some killstreaks such as auto-target artillery (You don't control it, but it fires randomly at players around the map), just stuff that makes the game fun and enjoyable while still not deviating away from the Root of the series. Plus some destructable enviroments would be a plus (Not as much as Bad Company, thats a little over board), but just enough that people could at least make new entrances into areas while closing off old ones.
My question is - why would it have to be "CoD"? Why not just call it "Space Adventure Game, Set in the Future... OF SPACE"? Oh right, because "Call of Duty" is a brand name associated with FUCKTONS OF MONEY, riight. But y'know, live and let live. Wait. What was the question again?
Yes, I would play Space Adventure Game, Set in the Future... OF SPACE.
Yes, I would play Space Adventure Game, Set in the Future... OF SPACE.
I recieved mw2 for my birthday because my sister knew that most of my friends had it and played it. I wouldn't have chosen to buy it with my own money and certainly did not request it. It was a present and I felt obliged to play it, as it was expensive back then. Beside everyone I knew was going on and on about how good it was/going to be. I played it for a week and it was the most bullshit game I've played. Never been a fan of the CoD games apart from that one sneak mission in CoD4.emeraldrafael said:
Flat out told everyone I knew that I didn't want black ops so I wouldn't recieve it later on. So, I'm sorry, but your statement is complete rot. I'm not bullshitting you, I would actually turn down a new CoD if someone gave it to me, or would sell it on.
emeraldrafael said:
If you like playing it then no other game is going to make you renounce it and never play it. As it is, I prefer gears of war 2 for the mindless, brain blowing fun. The headshot noise is THE most satisfying noise. Period. And seeing what was your enemy fly away from you in little gibblets after you hit them point blank with the shotgun is always fun. The online is no where near as broken as mw2 was.
Selling my copy of Call of Duty 2 was a terrible mistake when I think about it. I find myself missing killing Nazis as well.WrongSprite said:
Actually, I'm looking way more forward to Call Of Duty: Medieval Warfare. I want to fight in the battle of Agincourt FPS style. Or, I guess it would be...FPA. First-Person Archery...
Yeah, you know, except for the fact that the main heroes of both Modern Warfare games are S.A.S. and the whole Modern Warfare 2 end thing...SteewpidZombie said:
Have you even played the games?
OT: Yeah, sure. Not a fan of future warfare that much, but definitely a fan of CoD. Could be fun.
I've played them, but basically the story in every Modern Warfare is heavily plotted around the US fighting Russia. Even with the S.A.S they don't really seem to make them the heroes. Sure the dudes go and save the world from the main villain in each game, but they get zero credit, and even Mc'Tavish allows that nuke to hit the US (Or was it just a missle?) just so that the US can have a reason to launch a full scale war on Russia...or something...I dunno...I started to loose interest the story when Commander Shepard (Who you've only known for like 3 minutes tops) shoots Ghost and has a marshmellow roast over Roach's body.JourneyThroughHell said:
Edit: Know what'd make a fun Modern Warfare...a war with someone completely random (Draw name outta a hat type thing) like Canada or Antartica. Canada would be so WTF? and could make some sense in a WTF? way. US or Canada wouldn't see it coming AT ALL, and the fact that the whole Canadian/American rivalry would be funny to watch online (Americans screaming about our hockey not being a sport, and us screaming about how someone stole our moose and knocked over our igloo). Or a war with Antartica...because someone has to fight those dam penguins.
McTavish allows the nuke to hit the U.S.A.? I thought Price pre-emptively detonated it in space...SteewpidZombie said:
Also, so, where's the glorious U.S.A.-only praising message there? The Americans have done largely nothing during the first game and the second one.
nope, not at all, but I will be getting Tom Clancy Ghost recon: Future Soldier.Trezu said:
After actually wasting womeny on black ops, Call of Duty can go and die in a ditch. Kotick's getting no more of my money, except for maybe Diablo III.
It's a shame too, Call of Duty used to be so good.
-Tabs<3-
*Facepalm* My bad, 'Price' lets the nuke hit the US in Mod 2. He was on the submarine and didn't bother stopping the launch. And the whole American Message is basically that Russia is bad and US is good (Both games have Russian bad guys who somehow get ahold of nukes that they decide to launch at the US. And of course, Oh woe is the US being threatened by the Russian boogeyman, untill of course they get their Marines to kick into gear to kick some Middle Eastern (Mod 1) or Russian (Mod 2) arse. (Plus a Mod 3 would top the cake since it would revolve around a American invasion of Russia (Hinted by the US Marines in Mod 2 talking about attacking Russia or taking the war back to Russia).JourneyThroughHell said:
Edit: I just found that both games seemed to really have a Anti-Russian flow going on, kinda portraying the Russians as some Nuke tossing force of evil. Except the Russian dude 'Nikoli' or something who shows up to help everynow and again.
I don't think so. Halo is currently my prefered FPS and Crysis has already paid the toll for me on near future warfare games. After playing the demo for the sequel I must say it's pretty damn awesome. I was also looking at the new Ghost Recon game (which apparently will never get a beta -_-) and it looks more promising than this concept, although it differs in certain tactical and gameplay elements.
I think it'll be a long time before I consider getting or even thinking about a CoD game after the aberration we call Black Ops.
I think it'll be a long time before I consider getting or even thinking about a CoD game after the aberration we call Black Ops.
I liked MW, MW2, and parts of BlOPs, although it did mess things up
I'll probably play MW3, and a future CoD could give them new mechanics to work with.
I'll probably play MW3, and a future CoD could give them new mechanics to work with.
I haven't spent money on COD since 4 (no not pirating, my little brother gets it)
Personally I enjoyed MW2's multiplayer and Black Ops single player, if Activision could get infinity ward to do the multiplayer and treyarch to d the single player I would be very happy
Personally I enjoyed MW2's multiplayer and Black Ops single player, if Activision could get infinity ward to do the multiplayer and treyarch to d the single player I would be very happy
This. I am disturbed that I own all COD games from 3 onwards, when I hardly play shooters.GamesB2 said:
I think it would be cool...if done right. But to do that, it would probably end up fighting aliens instead of Russians in the future. Unless you play as a squad of New Zealand soldiers infiltrating South Africa to destroy their space station they're working on......*Thinks about it for a moment*
Best idea...ever.
That's really not as much a pro-American message, but, rather, fanservice.Daedalus1942 said:
Well, him and Kamarov. And the Russian government being good guys in the first part.SteewpidZombie said:
Really, I'm Russian and I don't even mind the portrayal. Yeah, it's somewhat villainous, but it has been worse in many other games. At least here we can see some justification.
I feel that the Cod game play and shooters in general would be here for a long time, but I feel that the stories feel to camp, and the multiply player to be good but a little repetitive. The future could hold endless possibilities to story, but I feel like I would not get it if they didn't do something a little different gameplay wise. I don't mean change all the gameplay, add a new mechanic that could help it move from the frantic reflexive shooter, or camping for the whole game, though this is a fun and proven formula it's just over indulged in, and add some thing, like Halo 3 forge. That extended the game's life indeterminably, or like Dark Void's jet pack. The generic cover/run and gun, realist/camp shooter,is fun but is overwhelming the market that why I didn't pick up Cod Black Ops, because I saw that it would be Cod MW2 just more refined. I just want something different and a future Cod based game could do that very well.
This! dear god in heaven someone at treyarch (barring a return to infinity ward) listen to this!ComradeJim270 said:
Alternately other stuff back in time would be great too and for the love of god tell some real stories! Not everything has to have a plot involving brain washing, WMDs and the russians. Even on the Western Front there's plenty of story to be told, Operation Market Garden has been glossed over, looking at the European theater in general the entire Italian campaign? never seen it. How about fighting Rommel's Afrika Corps in North Africa? Hell you could even keep it with the SAS! (1st SAS formed and cut their teeth with the Long Range Desert Group working very hard to put a knife in to Rommel's side, and high explosives in to his bombers).
Back in the pacific you could make entire GAMES about the battles for Okinawa and Iwo Jima, jumping through a selection of different characters and view points to get an in depth picture of some of the most bloody and violent fighting in history.
The list goes on but we keep mining the invasion of normandy to death instead.
If we really are going back in time, I want an FPS where I get to be a Mongol.
Objective 1: Make a pile of human skulls
Objective 2: Drive your enemies before you and hear the lamentations of their women
OT: A future warfare game would be cool, but it'd have to match up to the Tom Clancy Future Warrior (or whatever it was called) and Battlefield 2142 at the very least and from the current path I just don't think the COD crew can do it.