Would you sleep with yourself?

[Elate]

Yep, and society would probably never see me again.

I mean, I have a hard time resisting a mirror.

 

[renegade7]

Well, while I am a fine specimen of manliness and a perfect demonstration of the beauty of the human form, I just don't go that way.

 

[White Lightning]

Hmmm... assuming this is an exact replica of me (including thoughts and memories) it would probably try to kill me. As I have already decided from a previous conversation that if I ever met a clone of myself I would try to kill it.

If it was a female version of me I feel the result would be the same but I would probably lose as I don't like hitting girls.

 

[ClockworkPenguin]

If I had a duplicate version of myself, sleeping with myself wouldn't be the first thing to cross my minds. Regardless, I probably would (Rule 63'd or not doesn't matter)

I trust myself more than anyone else in the world
I am my own type
I get to try out lots of stuff

I'm probably going to regret this, but what is rule 63?

 

[Eddie the head]

If I had a duplicate version of myself, sleeping with myself wouldn't be the first thing to cross my minds. Regardless, I probably would (Rule 63'd or not doesn't matter)

I trust myself more than anyone else in the world
I am my own type
I get to try out lots of stuff

I'm probably going to regret this, but what is rule 63?

I think it's that if there is a male version of someone on the internet someone has made a female version or something to that effect. What he is saying is that if it was a female version of him he would go for it. (to me that would be like fucking you sister but whatever)

 

[Relish in Chaos]

No, because I'm disgusting.

 

[Blaster395]

If I had a duplicate version of myself, sleeping with myself wouldn't be the first thing to cross my minds. Regardless, I probably would (Rule 63'd or not doesn't matter)

I trust myself more than anyone else in the world
I am my own type
I get to try out lots of stuff

I'm probably going to regret this, but what is rule 63?

Inverted gender.

I am saying that I don't care about the gender of my duplicate.

 

[ImmortalDrifter]

No. I'm way too controling for myself.


lol

 

[dancinginfernal]

If it were a female me, yes. But it is not, so no.

Captcha: tea with jam

No thank you Captcha, I just had a big lunch.

 

[Mournful Crow]

Well, i'm not homosexual so no. Why would I?

Well, no. I'm not a homosexual, and as badass as it can look, long-haired men with a beard aren't exactly attractive. At least not in my case

No, I'm not gay so a guy is not exactly appealing to me.

Technically, if it's a perfect clone of yourself, even including all of your memories up to the point of being cloned, then it's a second physical manifestation of yourself.


It's not gay, because it's you. There's just two of everything.

It's quite bit more philosophical than it first seems to be

It's not like either of you really exist, anyway. David Hume, AWAY!

OT: OP has clearly stumbled into a time paradox and encountered himself. They then seduced each other and he's trying to justify it.

snip

I'm wise to your tricks!

Snip?... OT: It's not gay, it's just masturbation. Come on guys, surely you've realized that...

 

[Beautiful Tragedy]

Ya, i think so..BUT I would sleep with my old self. lol being trans it would be a "little" different i suppose than just "masturbation:.

 

[Ragsnstitches]

Well, i'm not homosexual so no. Why would I?

Well, no. I'm not a homosexual, and as badass as it can look, long-haired men with a beard aren't exactly attractive. At least not in my case

No, I'm not gay so a guy is not exactly appealing to me.

Technically, if it's a perfect clone of yourself, even including all of your memories up to the point of being cloned, then it's a second physical manifestation of yourself.


It's not gay, because it's you. There's just two of everything.

It's quite bit more philosophical than it first seems to be

Oh well if thats the case...

No, cause I will have traumatized 2 of me (or traumatized me twice as much?).