Hahaha... yep, that's probably the #1 cause of aggression.CyprisVeil said:You know what else can cause aggression? Life. Oh snap!
Hahaha... yep, that's probably the #1 cause of aggression.CyprisVeil said:You know what else can cause aggression? Life. Oh snap!
The real debate SHOULD be over that, I agree. Right now the debate is just faulty studies and people poorly interpreting them.Gamblerjoe said:I think the real debate is whether video games cause violence above and beyond humans' natural desire to propagate violence.
Video games can not directly cause aggression. They can potentially increase aggressive behavior temporarily(no evidence yet for long term aggression increase). Also, anecdotal evidence has no place in the discussion when you make a claim like that.SoopaSte123 said:snip
I dunno. If you think about it, the response to getting slapped has many crucial variables (like say, who slapped me? why?). One of those is the inherent temper of the slappee. I certainly know people I would NEVER EVER slap cause they'd probably snap....my neck. And that itself IS a personal characteristic.SoopaSte123 said:I don't think you can say PURELY personal characteristic, because some things are more likely to cause it than others.GrizzlerBorno said:OT: You kind of make a good point, but conclude it wrong, imo. Here's how I look at it: Instead of blaming the MEDIUM for inciting you with feelings of competitive rage..........why not blame....you know, your competitive feelings?
Or blame is a bad word, because there is nothing inherently wrong with feeling competitive, but the fact is that is a PURELY personal characteristic that is no way connected to the medium. A not-so-competitive guy could play CoD/Tekken/Super Meat Boy for hours and still not get angry because they just aren't that competitive as a person (case-in-point:me)
For example, a man could get super angry and aggressive every time someone says the word "orange". THAT would be a good example of purely personal characteristic. If you slap someone in the face and they get angry, you can't blame that purely on their personality. That doesn't mean EVERYONE will get angry and aggressive if you slap them, its just the slapping is much more likely to cause someone anger and aggression.
Same kind of idea with video games, just less-extreme. That make sense?
Yes, I'm well aware video games are not going to become self aware and hit me, thus causing aggression. When I say "cause aggression" I mean "increase aggressive behavior temporarily" just as you said, which I believe is apparent if you read my post. No need to nitpick.RedEyesBlackGamer said:Video games can not directly cause aggression. They can potentially increase aggressive behavior temporarily(no evidence yet for long term aggression increase). Also, anecdotal evidence has no place in the discussion when you make a claim like that.SoopaSte123 said:snip
You're first point is good, but I don't really agree with your second point. Kids being "violent" in the way you described, would happen in a vacuum, completely independent of violent media. Kids fight, that's just the way it goes, it's part of playing. Cops and robbers, sword fights, those stupid inflatable boxing glove things. I'm pretty sure kids(especially boys) have played some kind of violent competitive game since the beginning of time. Cavemen children probably had "spear fights." I don't think you can blame that on violent media, i think that is simply a product of human nature.SoopaSte123 said:Yes, it is true. I'm tired of the debate and all the studies that go back and forth and say "Yes! Video games cause aggressive behavior!" and "No! Video games are harmless!" when the answer seems pretty obvious, so I'm going to say my piece on it for those who care to listen.
I believe there are 2 ways video games can cause aggressive behavior.
Case 1: as I kid I remember playing Tekken against my friend Jake. After a while playing against each other we got really pissed and angry at each other to the point of wanting to hit each other.
HOWEVER, this was not some mind-controlling evil magic of video games, this was from the COMPETITION. Both Jake and I are competitive people, and as young children who have more trouble controlling our emotions, we got pissed off that we were losing to one another. Yes video games helped cause the aggression, but ANY competitive game or sport could. It could have been table tennis or Risk or American football (oh boy do I have some stories of backyard football causing aggression).
This isn't limited to a multiplayer situation, either. Single player games have competition, too: you vs the computer. Tell me you have never been frustrated playing against a computer at some point, be it against a tough boss in Mega Man or being mauled to death in Demon's Souls or playing on the "insane" difficulty of some game. Frustration can cause aggression.
So Lesson 1: Competition can cause aggression. Most video games have competition of some sort, so they can cause aggression, but they do not cause aggression simply for being video games.
Case 2: As a young kid, I was playing with my little sister after watching the awesome Batman animated series. I imagined we were Batman and Robin battling some villain (I don't recall which one). During the vicious battle, the villain fired something at Robin. My sister didn't try to dodge, so to provide the effect of Robin getting hit, I smacked my sister in the stomach. She went crying to my mother and got in trouble.
Why do I bring this up? Well, one can say that if I hadn't watched the violent Batman tv shows I wouldn't have been violent with my sister. It's a harsh statement to make, but in part it is true; if I had just sat there all day instead of watching Batman or playing, I wouldn't have hit my sister. That's not reasonable, though! Little kids are going to play and are going to be aggressive at times because they have SO much freaking energy. Watching Batman would make them aggressive, as would watching Indiana Jones or Power Rangers or playing violent video games or listening to ye olde radio with stories of cowboys and indians or anything else. It happens regardless.
Now as adults we are better at controlling our emotions but there is still an effect on us. If you don't believe me, go watch something like Taken or the Boondock Saints and tell me you don't kinda feel like beating somebody up. There is something inherently cool about shooting or beating up bad guys, and watching violent movies or playing violent video games will evoke our primal urge to kill things and be badass motherfukers.
So Lesson 2: Being exposed to ANY sort of violent entertainment will tend to evoke aggressive tendencies.
Now, I'd love to say there is no difference between playing violent video games and watching violent tv or movies, but I can't say that with all honesty. See, my Case 2 applies to video games + tv + movies, but Case 1 only applies to video games + competitive games/sports. Our medium is the first to combine both cool characters and violent stories with competitive games, and I believe the combination of both does indeed make video games a little bit more likely to evoke aggression than tv or movies.
So what's the bright side of this (and there better be a bright side because I love video games as much or more than the next guy)? The aggression caused by the evocative nature of video games is still minimal. Growing up with video games, I can say that playing tennis has caused me just as much (if not more) aggressive behavior as playing video games. I can also say that there are many many video games out there that LOWER my aggressive behavior by allowing me to relax or unwind.
No, Fox News, video games do not cause killing sprees. Yes, parents, you should limit your children's time with video games just as you would with tv or movies. No, Congress, you should not pass laws forbidding the sale of games to kids because it's not the end of the world if kids play violent games.
*Sighhhhhhhhh* I'm good now. No more ranting. Wow that's a lot of text. I'd love to hear your thoughts and opinions about my ramblings, escapists.
tl;dr Video games can cause violent behavior just like tv, movies, and competitive sports AND they're as equally emotionally harmless.
EDIT: Hahaha I love how some of you are quick to point blame at me, seemingly before you even read the TLDR. I was age 8 or 9 at the time of my story (I don't quite remember), so 13 years ago. I can control my emotions just fine now, thanks.
Also, here's a TLDR that sums up my post better than me
mocruz1200 said:TLDR?
1. people will be competititive, no matter what the activity
2. kids will be idiots that want to mimic every cool thing they see on tv/movies/games. but its up to the parents to teach them better.
THANK YOU!!!mocruz1200 said:i think the whole "video games promote violence thing" is a load of crap.
i play shooters, all the people that i know who play shooters(even the ones who are gun nuts) are docile people. games like CoD, L4D, TF2, GoW, ETC., let you do things you cant in real life. you get to experience a simulation of war(CoD,Battlefield,GoW) survival(L4D,Dead Rising, Dead Space, Killing Floor ETC.) or just plain killing others with a sort of humor attached to it.(TF2). yes, some people are agressive, and SURPRISE! some of them play video games. and, with all respect to you and the examples you chose, i bielive that they are wrong for your argument. your Tekken example: i used to play Street fighter at an arcade with buddies and random people there. and, like your example, things would get heated up, to the point where we DID end up in blows.now is that because of the video game? or our competitive nature? if we had been paintballing, playing football(the real kind, not handegg =P), or basketball, the outcome would have probably been the same. competitive people will be competitive.
as far as your second example, i turn to this:
![]()
now im not calling anyone a retard with this, but what i am trying to say is that it is not the persons fault(child or adult)for wanting to replicate something they saw, but in the case of the child, proper guidance should be provided to teach them that not everything that they see is real, nor should they try it.
TLDR?
1. people will be competititive, no matter what the activity
2. kids will be idiots that want to mimic every cool thing they see on tv/movies/games. but its up to the parents to teach them better.
But would you say NOTHING triggers aggression except personality, then? Because somewhere there will always be someone who won't be affected by it. If not, where would you draw the line? 90% of the people are affected? 80%?GrizzlerBorno said:I dunno. If you think about it, the response to getting slapped has many crucial variables (like say, who slapped me? why?). One of those is the inherent temper of the slappee. I certainly know people I would NEVER EVER slap cause they'd probably snap....my neck. And that itself IS a personal characteristic.SoopaSte123 said:snip
Same goes for competitiveness, frustration.etc. There are just SO many variables, and it's wrong imo, to look at one of the triggers (the fact that he is a gamer) and blame just THAT one aspect, ignoring all the other variables like personality, psyche, society, personal situation, socio-economic situation, Entertainment habits (as clues, not as causes), I could go on.etc.
It's especially bad when psychiatrists make those fucking "Games make kids rapists" derp statements, because they are supposed to be the ones who understand and dissect this shit! Not us Forum goers!
I made the first point because you would be surprised at how many people don't know the difference between the two. No offense intended. This is a claim that is currently being tested. Meaning that idle speculation serves no purpose. It is like with people who claim a same sex household can't raise children properly. I have citable evidence to the contrary. Their claim is moot until they find evidence to support their claim. Sorry, I just take these types of discussions very seriously.SoopaSte123 said:Yes, I'm well aware video games are not going to become self aware and hit me, thus causing aggression. When I say "cause aggression" I mean "increase aggressive behavior temporarily" just as you said, which I believe is apparent if you read my post. No need to nitpick.RedEyesBlackGamer said:Video games can not directly cause aggression. They can potentially increase aggressive behavior temporarily(no evidence yet for long term aggression increase). Also, anecdotal evidence has no place in the discussion when you make a claim like that.SoopaSte123 said:snip
And I can give anecdotal evidence anytime I wish, thank you very much. This is obviously not a post I'm trying to make scientific. Adding anecdotes makes it more personal and I believe helps people see things from my perspective. I'm certainly not going around saying "I punched someone after playing video games so they are EVIL!!!"
Fair point. It seems common sense. But if you're doing studies in which you have a kid alone or a kid that gets to play a fun video game, which would you think would be classified as more aggressive? That's why I think the point needs to be made. Kids get wound up over things.spartan231490 said:You're first point is good, but I don't really agree with your second point. Kids being "violent" in the way you described, would happen in a vacuum, completely independent of violent media. Kids fight, that's just the way it goes, it's part of playing. Cops and robbers, sword fights, those stupid inflatable boxing glove things. I'm pretty sure kids(especially boys) have played some kind of violent competitive game since the beginning of time. Cavemen children probably had "spear fights." I don't think you can blame that on violent media, i think that is simply a product of human nature.SoopaSte123 said:snip
No offense taken, and I'm sorry if I came off a bit harsh myself. It is indeed a serious matter, so I understand your conviction.RedEyesBlackGamer said:I made the first point because you would be surprised at how many people don't know the difference between the two. No offense intended. This is a claim that is currently being tested. Meaning that idle speculation serves no purpose. It is like with people who claim a same sex household can't raise children properly. I have citable evidence to the contrary. Their claim is moot until they find evidence to support their claim. Sorry, I just take these types of discussions very seriously.SoopaSte123 said:snip