Haerthan said:
Lightknight said:
Women do make testosterone. Their ovaries and adrenal glands make it.
Yeah, but I also didn't say they didn't. Women also have muscles and are perfectly capable of performing most tasks that men can perform even if they're at a disadvantage of doing so as efficiently. But the difference in amounts produced is significant. Surely you're not dismissing the impact testosterone has as a steroid in males? Women produce 5-10% the amount that men produce.
Also don't ever piss of a woman, or get between her and her children, she will murder you with whatever tools she has at hands.
Holy crap, ever seen a fight between girls? They're like whirlwinds with nails flying and gnashing of teeth. Their intent appears to be to maim or damage the other rather than to just overcome them like a lot of male fights I've seen. Terrifying, really. But I've also seen the other way around where a man is intent on fighting back and once the switch is flipped and the man is pushed to defending himself the woman had better have better training or better tools at her disposal.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pRPtPbAPNgU
The general sentiment is universal that men can't hit women. Ever wonder why that's a strong belief? Do you think it's just Victorian era residue or due to the power disparity?
Please understand that I am not calling women weak. I am saying that they are weaker in comparison to men. But not weak in general. There's a huge difference there.
I do like how you use the word "truth". Truth is a relative thing.
No, it's not. The sky is blue because of the wavelengths we see. Facts are truth. Opinions are relative. Whoever started claiming that truth is relative defeated themselves the moment they made an absolute (aka, non-relative) claim about the nature of truth being relative. Relative truth is seldom used in debate by the honest and objective.
Yes we can acknowledge that women are 50% weaker than men. But we must ensure that we never ever go back to the ideals of the Victorian era, otherwise we are no better than savages.
I agree that we should never return to the mentality that anyone is second class. But I hardly think Victorian era people were savages

.
And when I said we can override our sexual dimorphism using our brains I MEANT WE CAN THINK ABOUT IT to develop plans to override nature, not use our brains to influence our growth and development. There is a reason for our dominance of the earth.
Ah, so we could use science to overcome sexual dimorphism. That makes far more sense than it purely being a mental task to overcome.
As I asked before, do you think we should? Do you think it is right to alter an infant female to be more like a man? I find that notion incredibly sexist. Like admitting that women are inferior to men and need to be genetically modified to be equal. I just don't agree with that at all. Sounds like an extreme form of sexism, really, and I'm surprised to hear that come from a woman.
I still believe women could use longswords, they just had less endurance as you say, because of a lack of training. Regardless of the technique at play.
Ok, then we aren't disagreeing.