Well, what I think, is that a girl who thinks she's funny has wondered here when the cage door was left open, and now she somehow made a thread.Cajt said:
Yesterday
- Thread starter deedee03
- Start date
Recommended Videos
Owl eyes... hmm... Maybe people aren't people! Maybe we are owls! Or maybe we don't descend from apes after all, but from owls!deedee03 said:
why thankyouMachines Are Us said:Are you high by any chance?
Yesterday/Today/Tomorrow are terms, terms invented by humans.
The reason yesterday is yesterday is because it was the word invented (in English) to describe a specific amount of time before now.
Also, saying this:
is really this:
is insulting to the latter.
On a side-note: I see you like BeetleJuice so you get a thumbs up.
I like the objectivist view. What you see is what you see and what you get. There are several philosophies. Many include the theory that life is not what we see, that we live in a hallucination. Might be true, but I prefer the terms of science. Does A=B? Maybe, but we know nothing about it, cause we have no knowledge of B. We do, however, by observation know that A=A as a scientific fact. This fact may be false, but why linger around a world made of, say for example, pudding, that might not even exist, when we can concentrate on what we got?
Oh, and life and death/the laws of aging are terms created by humans, based on the knowledge of what comes after the other. We do know, by the laws of time (that we also came up with) that life comes before death, as death is defined by us what is not life, and we define life as what we are going through right now.
And we do know that a cat is not a dog. We came also up with the word cat, as a generalization of the creature that we call cat. By observable facts in our world. A dog is a dog, cause it has the characteristics that define the term we refer to as a dog. A cat isn't a dog, but an animal is an animal.
If you like to know more, I suggest you read Objectivist Epystomology by Ayn Rand. The book will explain everything on the subject.
Oh, and life and death/the laws of aging are terms created by humans, based on the knowledge of what comes after the other. We do know, by the laws of time (that we also came up with) that life comes before death, as death is defined by us what is not life, and we define life as what we are going through right now.
And we do know that a cat is not a dog. We came also up with the word cat, as a generalization of the creature that we call cat. By observable facts in our world. A dog is a dog, cause it has the characteristics that define the term we refer to as a dog. A cat isn't a dog, but an animal is an animal.
If you like to know more, I suggest you read Objectivist Epystomology by Ayn Rand. The book will explain everything on the subject.
Eh well because we offically named them a cat and a dog there for they are a cat and a dog, they are also named something else in other languages it's a namewe have given to them. It's not that hard to grasp.deedee03 said:the spelling of a CAT and DOG i ment-whos to say the spelling of a cat or dog isnt DNAponcho14 said:
Cause we invented spelling.deedee03 said:the spelling of a CAT and DOG i ment-whos to say the spelling of a cat or dog isnt DNAponcho14 said:
I'm gonna go with it is what it is and tommorow never comes because it always becomes today first.
also,quit trying to make me think with randomly strung-together terms invovling time.yeesh,If you said a thousand years ago into the future while a smoke machine ran I'd think you were a version of the robitic ghost of christmas past from the future -joke-
also apparently you're quoting beetlejuice somehow,so you get props for taste.
also,quit trying to make me think with randomly strung-together terms invovling time.yeesh,If you said a thousand years ago into the future while a smoke machine ran I'd think you were a version of the robitic ghost of christmas past from the future -joke-
also apparently you're quoting beetlejuice somehow,so you get props for taste.