Have you ever heard something along those lines? Like somehow you're not allowed to be bummed out that you got rejected by someone you like or McDonalds forgot your fries and you already drove away because someone somewhere out there has it worse than you do?
Now I don't deny that, and yes, I think that if you took someone whose iPod just broke and put them next to someone whose beloved childhood pet just died, normally common sense will side with the latter having more right to be upset at the matter.
But I just don't understand the logic behind it. Why does it only seem to apply to sadness?
Should I also not be allowed to be happy that I found a dollar in my jacket pocket because someone out there just won $1,000 on a scratch ticket? Am I not allowed to be angry at people going 15 miles under the speed limit because someone out there just got rear ended by someone on a cell phone?
What do you all think? Do you think we just use the "Well, at least you're better off than this person" logic as a method of perspective, or is it to just help ground us.
Now I don't deny that, and yes, I think that if you took someone whose iPod just broke and put them next to someone whose beloved childhood pet just died, normally common sense will side with the latter having more right to be upset at the matter.
But I just don't understand the logic behind it. Why does it only seem to apply to sadness?
Should I also not be allowed to be happy that I found a dollar in my jacket pocket because someone out there just won $1,000 on a scratch ticket? Am I not allowed to be angry at people going 15 miles under the speed limit because someone out there just got rear ended by someone on a cell phone?
What do you all think? Do you think we just use the "Well, at least you're better off than this person" logic as a method of perspective, or is it to just help ground us.