You have a gun with one bullet...
- Thread starter TopHatsaur
- Start date
Recommended Videos
Leave both alone, and sell the gun. Merchants pay normal dollar for guns, man. That, or use the gun to repair my other guns. Can never have enough guns to keep your guns in repair.
shooting world war would eventually stop world hunger.
but people never change making this action useless.
shooting myself is only a temporary solution.
so I would shoot world hunger.
it,s not going to stop everything but it,s the best outcome.
but people never change making this action useless.
shooting myself is only a temporary solution.
so I would shoot world hunger.
it,s not going to stop everything but it,s the best outcome.
I'd miss... without both, the world will become over-populated and thus, shit. Sure, shooting world hunger would mean that the now excessive population won't starve... but they won't have any room to stand, either
Ah, what a fine moral dilemma this is. I could shoot myself, but that would only resolve the issue temporarily...I curve the bullet making it hit both of them! The world is saved, time for PARTY BUS!
Hmm. I'd shoot World war, and then beat Hunger to death with the gun. It'd probably be quite weak.
And thus problem is solved thanks to violence!
And thus problem is solved thanks to violence!
I'd shoot the bullet into the ground. I wont take away hunger or war and for the same reason.
People need to choose. That's what life is about, choosing. Even if your only choice is to hate or love your captor, the choice is yours to make. I will not take from people their right to choose if they will or will not feed the hungry. I will not take from people their right to choose to murder in mass numbers.
In my opinion, it is more heartless and evil to take away Stalin's right to starve the Ukrainians in the Holodomor than it is for him to commit such reckless hate.
People need to choose. That's what life is about, choosing. Even if your only choice is to hate or love your captor, the choice is yours to make. I will not take from people their right to choose if they will or will not feed the hungry. I will not take from people their right to choose to murder in mass numbers.
In my opinion, it is more heartless and evil to take away Stalin's right to starve the Ukrainians in the Holodomor than it is for him to commit such reckless hate.
I would ironically shoot war. Despite several earlier assertions that resource scarcity is the main cause of war, I must disagree. Nationalism (religious fundamentalism is a form of nationalism) has been the primary cause of war. Certainly this was the case in the twentieth century. War is more dehumanizing than hunger, and ending it would free up more resources to fight hunger. Economic and social development tends to deal with the population problem far better and, need I really mention, more humanely than war.
World War, because without war, we can use the free resources to fix or alleviate World Hunger.
I would keep both under control using the threat of the Magical Bullet. It's a deterrent, not a weapon!TopHatsaur said:
all three options would cause global over population. I'm going to sound evil but the only way happiness can be achieved in this world is though sacrificing the earthly bodies of many animals and humans. Animals must be killed for food and humans must be killed in war for both our safety and to lessen our numbers.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Overpopulation
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Overpopulation
"A great war leaves the country with three armies - an army of cripples, an army of mourners, and an army of thieves." - German Proverb
War it is. Without wars, we will eventually overcome hunger. Suicide is not an option.
War it is. Without wars, we will eventually overcome hunger. Suicide is not an option.
Fortunately, sniper bullet.
But in fairness, I'd let World War eat some lead. We can always grow more food with the space we aren't using for military bases. We can't as easily grow more humans.
But in fairness, I'd let World War eat some lead. We can always grow more food with the space we aren't using for military bases. We can't as easily grow more humans.
