Also... The Taliban would still have Afghanistan under Sharia law. The discontent in the middle east would increase over time and Afg would be used more and more as a training haven. US would invade anyway to stop this, as there would be increasing threats from the country and no stable govt to stop it.thaluikhain said:Alternatively, Al-Qaeda sees the increased security, and doesn't attack on 9/11, and so attacks on some other day. Maybe they guy luckier this time around, and all the planes reach their targets.briankoontz said:But then something interesting happens. Let's say that based on the "prediction" of 9/11 that 9/11 is prevented. Because it's prevented the revenge excuse the Bush Administration used to invade Afghanistan and Iraq is gone, and if the excuse was what allowed that reality to occur then maybe the invasion of Iraq and Afghanistan never would have happened, or at least would have happened differently to how they did. Because the invasions never happen all reality *connected to* the invasions never happens - in other words the entire course of history is changed, triggered by the prediction of 9/11.
The problem with stuff like 911, is that people don't really see the problem until it's happened. You had procedures to be put in place if that sort of thing happened, only it didn't click that this was what was going on.
Crashing airplanes into buildings sounds like a problem in theory, but didn't seem like a real threat people really had to react to, so the preventative measures failed.
So... the butterfly effect essentially.briankoontz said:But then something interesting happens. Let's say that based on the "prediction" of 9/11 that 9/11 is prevented. Because it's prevented the revenge excuse the Bush Administration used to invade Afghanistan and Iraq is gone, and if the excuse was what allowed that reality to occur then maybe the invasion of Iraq and Afghanistan never would have happened, or at least would have happened differently to how they did. Because the invasions never happen all reality *connected to* the invasions never happens - in other words the entire course of history is changed, triggered by the prediction of 9/11.
Possibly...they might have simply used the odd airstrike rather than an invasion.Elementary - Dear Watson said:Also... The Taliban would still have Afghanistan under Sharia law. The discontent in the middle east would increase over time and Afg would be used more and more as a training haven. US would invade anyway to stop this, as there would be increasing threats from the country and no stable govt to stop it.
This is true. The AFG lul during the Iraq years was still a drain, and did neither country any good!thaluikhain said:Possibly...they might have simply used the odd airstrike rather than an invasion.Elementary - Dear Watson said:Also... The Taliban would still have Afghanistan under Sharia law. The discontent in the middle east would increase over time and Afg would be used more and more as a training haven. US would invade anyway to stop this, as there would be increasing threats from the country and no stable govt to stop it.
The US wanted Iraq much more than 'stan. However, if they found an excuse to go to Iraq, but weren't also diverting massive resources to 'stan at the same time, things might well have turned out a lot better in Iraq.
In fairness, they didn't even listen to their own intel.Boris Goodenough said:Why not prevent it? Avoid decades of war and misery and hopefully make a more peaceful relationship between the west and the middle-east?
Depending on how early you arrive in 1991, you might not even need to learn guitar. Just steal "Smells Like Teen Spirit."mistahzig1 said:- Learn Guitar and steal all future songs that rock
Only if you've memorisized individual lottery results already, the OP didn't give you any warning you were being transported to 1991 after-all.duwenbasden said:- buy all the Lotteries.
The biggest reason 9/11 happened was that people in power didn't really care to have it not happen. It was a boon for the Bush Administration, making it way easier for them to achieve their foreign policy. The very people responsible for preventing it to some extent care about the lives of Americans, but they also care about their careers - rocking the boat by criticizing the way intelligence work was conducted in the American government may or may not have saved 3,000 American lives but it may well have gotten the criticizer fired.thaluikhain said:Crashing airplanes into buildings sounds like a problem in theory, but didn't seem like a real threat people really had to react to, so the preventative measures failed.