Your Geekbench score.

[GloatingSwine]

3678, 2.6GHz Core 2 Duo MacBook Pro.

 

[Horticulture]

Needs more LN2.

 

[Calgetorix]

It's because you're not running the 64bit version, 3 -3.5Gb of ram is as much as a 32bit program/operating system can use.

You're running a 32-bit OS. That means your OS can't "see" any more than 2^32 bytes of RAM, which is approximately 3.3 GB.

Ah yes, I've heard something about that, I just have a bad memory. Thanks for the replies.

 

[fd18e3d0-816e-11e4-b4a9-0800200c9a66]

I just have a bad memory.

Pun intended?

 

[Calgetorix]

I just have a bad memory.

Pun intended?

Haha, nope.

 

[Zepren]

Just ran it on mine. Got a score just under 2000. It wasn't the only thing running. Slowed down my download damnit :| (Total War: Napoleon. 50% done, CMON STEAM!)

 

[JustShyofGenius]

Summary
Section Description Score Geekbench Score 7201
Geekbench 2.1.4 for Windows x86 (32-bit)
Integer Processor integer performance 8273
Floating Point Processor floating point performance 8701
Memory Memory performance 4223
Stream Memory bandwidth performance 4165


System Information
Operating System Microsoft Windows 7 Ultimate
Model Gigabyte Technology Co., Ltd. EX58-UD3R Motherboard Gigabyte Technology Co., Ltd. EX58-UD3R
Processor Intel Core i7 920
Processor ID GenuineIntel Family 6 Model 26 Stepping 4
Processor Frequency 2.79 GHz Processors 1
Cores 4 Threads 8
L1 Instruction Cache 64.0 KB L1 Data Cache 64.0 KB
L2 Cache 8.00 MB L3 Cache 0.00 B
Memory 4.00 GB 400 MHz FSB 133 MHz
BIOS Award Software International, Inc. F1

 

[mikecoulter]

snip

I could steal an old BBC Micro from my Sixth form and post it to you I suppose... =P

You're right, that is good pretty darn good for the 32bit. Have you seen the Geekbench scores of the upcoming Macbook Pros? They come with mobile Intel i5's + i7's, they crush my new iMac. But then, they're also £300 - £400 more...

No i havn't, might have to take a gander at some point.

Why did you have to post this, i wanted to get an early night but instead i've been trying to see how low i can get my benchmark by writing hideous programmes that create thousands of threads each one doing massive matrix multiplications and really causing my laptop some distress

EDIT: Your sixth form is using BBC Micro's????

Oh heck no, I do computing and we have a little history of computers display on a shelf in our computing room. There's a few classics there. No we use something far slower, RM Desktops... Yay.

 

[RagnorakTres]

My screen-cap isn't working for some reason...
I ran two tests, got solid scores in the mid-7000s.
Core i7 FTW, and I'm gonna be updating my GPU shortly XD

 

[fd18e3d0-816e-11e4-b4a9-0800200c9a66]

snip

Oh heck no, I do computing and we have a little history of computers display on a shelf in our computing room. There's a few classics there. No we use something far slower, RM Desktops... Yay.

I was going to say.
Ah i remember using RM's when i was at sixth form, such fantastic machines :/

 

[reg42]

Spoiler

Eh, not bad. I'll have to run it again once my PC gets it's upgrade.

 

[mikecoulter]

snip

Oh heck no, I do computing and we have a little history of computers display on a shelf in our computing room. There's a few classics there. No we use something far slower, RM Desktops... Yay.

I was going to say.
Ah i remember using RM's when i was at sixth form, such fantastic machines :/

They truly are the scum of the earth. There are 5 year old custom builds the techs made in our school that can run much faster.

 

[garbutt]

well, I got a grand total of 5928 - which I am content with

 

[IckleMissMayhem]

1652. Damn, I thought I'd be the one to get the under 150 score... Is it strange that I'm sorta disappointed? Guess my crappy laptop's not as crappy as I thought...

 

[mikecoulter]

1652. Damn, I thought I'd be the one to get the under 150 score... Is it strange that I'm sorta disappointed? Guess my crappy laptop's not as crappy as I thought...

I'm fairly certain a computer with a score of 150 would have difficulty even loading this site... But you could always try opening more programs then running the test for a lower score.

 

[Laughing Man]

5790

But I am sure that is totally incorrect for several reasons.

First of all I run a 64Bit OS but the free version of Geekbench will only allow you to run the 32Bit version. You need to pay to run the 64Bit version

Second it detects my I5 750 as a 2.67Ghz running at 2.27Ghz, that's wrong my Bios and CPUz both show a GPU frequency of 2.76Ghz.

http://browse.geekbench.ca/geekbench2/view/223137

 

[Dirkie]

696 on a 7 year old p4/1.8ghz/1gb compaq laptop. not bad at all.
(might try the p3/1.0ghz/256mb one tomorrow)

 

[Sieni]

Pretty good

 

[mikecoulter]

696 on a 7 year old p4/1.8ghz/1gb compaq laptop. not bad at all.
(might try the p3/1.0ghz/256mb one tomorrow)

Please do, I do rather like the stats of older machines!

 

[fd18e3d0-816e-11e4-b4a9-0800200c9a66]

snip
They truly are the scum of the earth. There are 5 year old custom builds the techs made in our school that can run much faster.

Tell me about it, i reckon it's some secret law that all sixth formers must suffer with RM's