Darth Rosenberg said:
I'm still undecided.
Console gens should've died off years ago, and right now both the XB1 and PS4 look like embarrassments compared to the PC. Yet I honestly can't be bothered with the hassle of PC gaming, so I'll no doubt end up with an XB1 or, maybe, a PS4.
Witcher 3, Arkham Knight, the new Tomb Raider, a version of DA:Inquisition that isn't a catastrophic mess, and maybe Halo 5 are reasons enough to 'need' a new machine, so I'll cave eventually.
It's arguable that consoles as we knew them are dead, and they started bleeding out when Sony first used slow, but high capacity, Blu rays in the PS3 (and MS using a DVD drive that may have originally been designed as a jet engine, for how loud it got, prompting them to add on an install feature of their own). Not counting the Wii U and portable/mobile, everything machine meant to run today's games is using x86 PC hardware, and that's not even the big issue.
What really sucks is mandatory installs (thanks to games getting so large GB-wise that the optical drives can't keep up), the limited space available for them, and the restrictions on expanding that space, especially with the xbone and it's HDD being behind a warranty void sticker. It's the PC's negative of not being able to just drop a disc in the machine and start playing, without the positive of being able to put an extra drive in (screw externals for games on any machine) (or a cheaper 3.5 inch drive in the PS4). Even if you do go with a work around for HDD space, doing the work around, the installs, and constant updates still undermine the whole concept of a game console, a self-sufficient, plug and play computer for playing video games.
I'll probably cave in to get a Sony or MS exclusive someday too, but, thanks the lackluster start and to almost every 3rd party making sure to get the largest audience possible (PS4, XBOX, and PC), it'll likely be when the eventual PS4 and Xbone redesigns have already been out for at least several months.