Excuse me?sumanoskae said:There are a hell of a lot more important things you should be worried about your government spending your money on.
That's just an arbitrary opinion on your part. It's my choice if I want to worry or care about whatever it is that my government spends my money on. And in this case I actually PAID for the right to have an opinion and views in regards to underage sex. You tried to argue the case that It's "none of my business", and when I called you out on it and illustrated what a bullshit argument that is, you put up a meek defense of "well there are more important things to care about".
It's still my choice what I care about or not, ESPECIALLY when it regards matters that im being obliged to finance with m7y own damn money.
Yeah, that's why there are truckloads of surveys and statistics showing that people IN GENERAL are fucking lousy at using contraception and STD's STILL run rampant.sumanoskae said:The fact is that most sane, well adjusted teens with access to protection will use it.
Im not saying that we're supposed to tell them not to do it. Regulation is prefectly possible. There's mandatory sterilization that can be reversed when the person in question reaches a legal age to procreate (that way they can fuck around all they want without running the risk of pregnancy). There's restriction to how underage girls and boys are allowed to interact with eachother socially etc.sumanoskae said:Telling them not to do it won't help, there's a higher rate of teen pregnancy with families who regulate the subject more. Do you honestly think that we'd be able to restrict something as natural and essential as sex?, even if we don't say anything, kids will figure it out.
All you need is a bit of creativity and you could regulate it just fine.
But that's beside the point since im not really interested in regulating it. What I am saying is that it's pretty fucking annoying that adult, hard-working taxpayers always have to pick up the cheque for what stupid teenagers do when they, in their naive little minds decide that they are "grown up enough" to drink themselves shitfaced and fuck around like little sluts (I use the term "slut" here in a gender neutral way, don't think for a second that you CAN'T be a slut just because you are male).
In fact, most of the time we have to pay for this even if we were smart enough not to put any wretched offspring of our own to this world. BUT STILL we are obliged to pay and repair the damages and general fuck ups caused by snot nosed little brats who are delusional to think they are "grown up enough".
And earlier you claimed that it's silly of us to have an opinion or views of their sexlife and general misbehaviour that WE, the taxpayers have to pay for. How's that fair? Is it not enough that our money is being stolen to fund something we'd NEVER willingly pay for if we actually had a choice, but we're not even supposed to be allowed to have an opinion of it? Really?
I think you'll find that sometimes it actually helps to think one step further than "whatever I do is my business and my business alone, and the rest of you aren't entitled to an opinion", because in most democratic societies, a system has been put in place that pretty much insures that actions that may SEEM like they are only affecting you, actually affect plenty of other people who REALLY don't wish to be involved in the slightest.
I never said that it gives me control of human will, but it DOES entitle me to an opinion. Neo-Nazis and the KKK are also entitled to their opinions. ESPECIALLY if they pay their taxes, because a taxpayer is actually supporting the democratic society (which do and SHOULD provide people with freedom of speech and freedom of opinions) rather than just sponge off of it.sumanoskae said:And I don't think the fact that you pay taxes gives you control over human will. Besides, by that logic everyone should have a say, yes?. Then what about people who disagree with you, or would use their money to support Neo-Nazis or the KKK?.
I don't give a shit. Several hundred kids starve to death in certain ass-ends of the world as it is, but do you see me caring in the slightest? I don't have to care about them (luckily, because my government doesn't have jurisdiction in those countries), but im FORCED to care (at least financially speaking) about some teenage idiot mothers bastard offspring, and that irks me. ANd I see no reason as to why I should support it willingly or refrain from commenting and expressing my views and opinions of that particular phenomenon.sumanoskae said:An argument could also be made(And I'm playing devils advocate here) that it's not the mother you're helping, but the child unfortunate enough to be born as such.
No it isn't my responsibility to aid anyone. Im being forced to take responsibility for the fuck-ups of teenagers by my government, and I have a right to have an opinion about that, that YOU certainly don't have the right to try and take away from me.sumanoskae said:The situation is shit, but that doesn't mean you can just ignore it. Isn't it your responsibility as a human being to aid those in need?. I don't think so, but there are plenty of tax payers that do.
If the teenagers stopped messing up all the time, then no money would have to be given to them for their fuck-ups. Ever heard of something called PERSONAL responsibility? Your argument basivally bottles down to that teenagers shouldn't have to assume any personal responsibility, and that I should complain to the government for the teenagers' idiocy.sumanoskae said:It's not the teenagers who are asking for your handout, it's the government that controls where tax money goes, if you have a problem, take it up with the people who control it, not the people who benefit from it.
I place the blame in it's rightful place.