To those posting YouTube are not to blame and it's just the DMCA at fault.
Bad law or not, the DMCA takedown requirement only applies to valid and legitimate claims.
YouTube accepts all takedown claims not just the valid and legitimate ones.
No innocent until proven guilty system applies at all. After two weeks all the bogus claims lapse and whatever revenue would have been made is lost forever.
With many topical issues, the debate has moved on and only the content maker suffers.
The bogus takedowns are intended to remove the content for those two weeks, they do exactly what the abusers want.
YouTube can easily stop this abuse with no more effort than used to allow it.
Firat simply freeze the payment on the video until it's resolved, this system already exists and is an option used by some legitimate DMCA claims where the claimant takes the money instead of removing the video.
So no automatic takedown needs to happen at all.
The winner of the dispute decides what happens, only once the claim is resolved. Not before.
Removing the entire purpose of abusing the system, stops the abuse.
This is why YouTube is to blaim, they allow the abuse of their system.
The DMCA doesn't apply to false claims. YouTubes rules do.