Cycloptomese said:
I don't think this is as big of a deal as most make it out to be. Also, it's definitely not censorship. Not even close.
True, it's not censorship, but it does somewhat limit what pundits can make a profit from. And frankly, if Fox News is allowed to make a buck talking about how awful everything is over in [somewhere], why shouldn't the little guy on Youtube be allowed to as well?
Frankly, this decision makes little sense to me, because its so simplistic. No content about war, famine or similar subjects? The Great War [https://www.youtube.com/user/TheGreatWar] has to remove all their content, because it's a channel about the history of World War I.
If The Great War doesn't get all of its content demonetized, then this whole thing is utterly arbitrary, which just defeats the purpose of it.