Zero Punctuation: Bulletstorm

Recommended Videos

Iwana Humpalot

New member
Jan 22, 2011
318
0
0
Crimson_Dragoon said:
I'm surprised he didn't mention that they answered his wish to have a gun that had tits on fire on it. Sure, it was just a painting on a gun, but it was a nice little call out to his Painkiller review.
Yeah, i wonder did he forget to mention it or is he so much above us that he can't be bothered by such things.
 

vrbtny

Elite Member
Sep 16, 2009
1,959
0
41
esliang said:
Bit of a shame that People Can Fly didn't just make a new Painkiller.
Er.... no it isn't. The Painkiller sequels slowly go down hill and are generally sucky.

Bulletstorm is better than most of the sequels.
 

Dark.Kantian

New member
Jan 31, 2011
25
0
0
I couldn't agree more, Yahtzee. Whatever good elements of mindless violence were resurrected in Bulletstorm from the crypts of mighty ancient first-person shooters, all that was invariably covered over with the shit and piss of modern day "realism".
 

The Electro Gypsy

New member
Aug 10, 2010
107
0
0
lol that was about as negative as I thought it'd be.

Personally I really enjoyed Bulletstorm, and it didn't come across as the Chest High Wall Shooter Yahtzee thought it was, granted, you do need to take cover, but that's in every shooter...

I found the super macho chars to be satirical, but the main char's whine did get on my nerves by the end, and it looked quite good.

Also, he's a loser cos he got it on Console, not PC :p
 

blindthrall

New member
Oct 14, 2009
1,149
0
0
Hey Escapist, the ad for that retarded shogun game fucked up the video. Apparently once the browser loaded the ad, it thought it was done. Nice to see where your priorities lie.
 

Levethian

New member
Nov 22, 2009
509
0
0
vrbtny said:
esliang said:
Bit of a shame that People Can Fly didn't just make a new Painkiller.
Er.... no it isn't. The Painkiller sequels slowly go down hill and are generally sucky.

Bulletstorm is better than most of the sequels.
Don't think People Can Fly made any sequels. As far as I'm aware, the released 'sequels' were basically mods/expansions by 3rd party developers.

And none of them are called 'Painkiller 2' ;)
 

Balaxe

New member
Mar 24, 2009
501
0
0
I thought the skill shot system was a great way to encourage players to try and use other ways to kill their opponents then just the plain spray-bullets-at-them-till-they-die method. Killing someone with the machine gun is 10 points. Shooting someone through the throat, attaching an explosion to them, kicking them into a spiked wall and detonating the body is over 100 points.
 

BigText

New member
Nov 21, 2007
27
0
0
I never got to play Doom or Painkiller, but I never once felt as though my character was slow. Then again, I just used leash-and-kick all damn day, so I was too busy bringing enemies to me to complain about bringing myself to them. Also, burnouts cluster together all the time until they get close to you. I remember one fantastic experience of leashing a burnout, attaching grenades to him, kicking him into an oncoming group of burnouts, killing him with the sniper rifle, and marveling as the grenades exploded anyway, killing all burnouts nearby, showering me with points.

Also, it never seemed like the main character couldn't choose between being angsty or being an insane killing machine. He started out as the latter, then moved to the former as he realized the number of consequences his actions had.

Yahtzee admitted that he had (some) fun with the game, though, and I guess that's all a person can really get.
 

Kyouki1980

New member
May 26, 2008
70
0
0
I do love Painkiller. I still play it on the hardest setting as I futilely struggle to complete it and grind my teeth in frustration as I die over and over again yet deep in my heart I love the pain.
Theres nothing fun about these triple A shooters. Their all the same, their short, the weapons are boring and the gameplay sucks. We need more Painkillers and Stalkers in our lives. Games that give us the gameplay we love so much and then crank up the difficulty to brain aneurysm levels.
 

RA92

New member
Jan 1, 2011
3,078
0
0
anian said:
Plus - damn you UDK, that makes all games look the same even though it's a powerfull modern engine!
I think what you mean is UE3, since UDK is a freeware development kit with a promising <url=http://www.udk.com/showcase>showcase of indie games.

And I don't think blaming the engine is the right thing to do, considering games with as diverse styles as Mass Effect, Bioshock, Singularity, Dark Void and Arkham Asylum were made with the same engine. Blame the game developers.

Aylaine said:
No mention of the tits on fire thing. Sad! :(

I watched the review hoping for that. x.x;!
Remember when Rebecca Mayes wrote an entire song about Yahtzee, and all she got was a passing mention worth about two seconds in his next review? Anyways, good thing he didn't mention the tits on fire - he would've probably made some snide remark about how it was more like bra-on-fire, with no chance of sucking up to them and relenting in his brutality.

The_root_of_all_evil said:
Realism sucks. There, I've said it.

Give us ESCAPISM. That's why we're here.
I'm sorry. CoD and GoW don't do realism. Regenerative health is not realistic. 'Lone Wolf' style gameplay is not realistic. What they do is uber-cliched and bad escapism.

The last realistic game I played, way back in the late 20th Century, was Falcon 4.0. And it was awesome.
 

vrbtny

Elite Member
Sep 16, 2009
1,959
0
41
Levethian said:
vrbtny said:
esliang said:
Bit of a shame that People Can Fly didn't just make a new Painkiller.
Er.... no it isn't. The Painkiller sequels slowly go down hill and are generally sucky.

Bulletstorm is better than most of the sequels.
Don't think People Can Fly made any sequels. As far as I'm aware, the released 'sequels' were basically mods/expansions by 3rd party developers.

And none of them are called 'Painkiller 2' ;)
A quick wikipedia visit later.

Oh, yeah. Good point (>.<)

One was a sequel/expansion by People can fly...... wasn't called painkiller 2 though...
 

Kermi

Elite Member
Nov 7, 2007
2,538
0
41
Well, I like Gear of War and I like stupid fun, so Bulletstorm was an acceptable mashup of both to me. I guess it helps that I think of Gears of War as a big dumb shooter with over-the-top machismo as the punchline already, so Bulletstorm is more like an evolution of Gears than a different game with Gears elements.

I think Yahtzee has some valid points about the combat being designed with a facer-paced game in mind but overall I had few problems making use of the secondary attacks when it counted, so your mileage may vary on that one.

Yahtzee, you could have at least acknowledged the fact that PCF put in a flaming tits skin for your gun, even if it is only available in the multiplayer (which is a good idea but limited by the fact that you have to play it with other people - who all SUCK). There's someone at PCF watching your review right now and feeling a bit betrayed, like you promised him an apple tart but when he really got was your cock on a plate, smeared with baby food.
 

ewhac

Digital Spellweaver
Legacy
Escapist +
Sep 2, 2009
575
0
21
San Francisco Peninsula
Country
USA
...And succeed in downing both him and themselves on a future equivalent of Butlin's [http://www.butlins.com/] that's been taken over by marauding gangs and mutants...
This line immediately reminded me of one of the least enjoyable episodes of Doctor Who ever made -- Delta and The Bannermen [http://tardis.wikia.com/wiki/Delta_and_the_Bannermen] (which was shot at a Butlin's resort in Wales).
 
Feb 13, 2008
19,429
0
0
Raiyan 1.0 said:
I'm sorry. CoD and GoW don't do realism. Regenerative health is not realistic. 'Lone Wolf' style gameplay is not realistic. What they do is uber-cliched and bad escapism.
Hey, I'm not saying it's realistic. They are. With their guns that exist before they existed, the ability to call down nukes from knifing someone and...

Yeah, maybe I should have put "REALISM" rather than realism. But realism, like the Columbine shooter sim, sucks equally.
 

Grahav

New member
Mar 13, 2009
1,129
0
0
Another review on the escapist pointed the same problems. Overall it is a good game, but it could have been better if it wasn't traped by the modern conventions.
 

jacobschndr

New member
Aug 15, 2008
580
0
0
eh, I still like the game. Multiplayers' a little broken, but still fun if your around the right people.