My confusion concerns that notion. Two of the comments referred to content FROM the video, implying that they had viewed it. However, if their times indicated that they replied so quickly that it was chronologically impossible for them to have seen the content AND posted, then I would concede entirely.adderseal said:It's because they replied before having seen the actual video. The rules are clear: bans and suspensions if you do it. It's an attention-grabbing thing that you'd think would have sorted itself out quickly. 60 Zero Punctuations later and it's still going ondietpeachsnapple said:I feel vaguely concerned about replying to this video, having seen the first five replies being suspended for theirs, two of which I feel are entirely legitimate. I am not sure if the mods felt they were too punctual, or too short on words... anyway. >.>