JamesStone said:
You're a victim of the telegraph game, or however the hell they call that thing when you whisper a message in another dude's ear and so forth until it's so distorted nothing can be properly distinguished anymore.
The "extremist" response was to a different designation of SJW, which nowadays indicates an extremist. Someone who takes a civil discussion which conclusions could improve the lives of many and take an aggressive, vindicative stance as if it was an actual battlefield and end up causing more harm than good.
The person suggesting the alternative term was merely referencing the "SJW" as a whole, not in this particular example.
Personally, I think the tag is stupid as all fuck, as the gender of the protagonist shouldn't be a defining factor in whenever you buy a damned game, movie or book or not, unless it's some kind of exploration of gender type. Wouldn't go as far as calling people who buy games just because the protagonist as a penis or a vagina as SJWs (I have other, Escapist-suspendable names for them), but that's difference of opinions for ya.
That's not necessarily what tags are for, though. They give an overview of various elements, and people can judge on the combination of them. It would be similarly ridiculous for someone to buy a game
purely on it having a great soundtrack, but that's a tag. But if three or four tags are things you'd like...? Go ahead, perfectly reasonable!
Same thing here. A female protagonist might appeal, and that's perfectly normal (we all have preferances for who or what we'll be controlling for 10-30 hours, which is why hundreds of RPGs allow extensive customisation).
Edit: Oh, and I've always heard it called "Chinese whispers".