The games I played had hardly any information on the eating other pokemon or killing people. In gold/silver you can buy a slowpokes tail as an item you can feed to your pokemon and for fun hunting for an easter egg i fed one to my slowpoke, unfortunately the programers never though to make an easter egg for such a devious act.MajoraPersona said:Pokemon cannibalism? As in, Pokemon eating each other (which isn't really cannibalism), or Pidgeot eating Pidgey? There's quite a difference, since each is supposed to be a different species. Plus, in the former case, it's well known they eat each other; half the pokedex entries are about how many pokemon that one eats (the other half are about how much the species in question kills people).Maclennan said:Really I just threw that in to to see how many people i could hook into talking about childhood icons like veal in the freezer. Also Pokemon cannibalism was worked into one reply.MajoraPersona said:Ba dum.HankMan said:I think I know why Yahtzee really doesn't like Pokemon.
It's because he hates going to the gym!
But seriously, I also hated the anorexic supermodel gym leader. Mainly because I kept using my water starter (bearded samurai that dual weilds shell swords). In fact, I forget how I beat her, since I kinda beat the game on the Tuesday after it came out (on a Sunday).
Why would he need to cover that? People have eaten pokemon since the original games (Farfetch'd?). It just doesn't come up much.Maclennan said:Heres the question he missed, what do the people in that world eat since every animal and most of the damn plants are pokemon?
I think a miltank would be quite tasty. Pikachu would probably be kind of stringy. They will probably resort to "iceberg lebtuce" soon.
Anyway, I disagree with some points in the video. First of all, when making a pokemon, you don't just change one letter in the name. You have to make it punny. Furthermore, video games typically ignore people who aren't involved in the subject matter (how many people in a Harvest Moon game don't live in a quiet farming town and do farming related things?). Besides, the whole 'these are our pets' thing makes the 'lots of people are affected' aspect a bit easier to swallow.
To be fair, it's almost always flavour text. However, a good number of pokedex entries reference the fact that x pokemon eats y. And, admittedly, the references to pokemon attacks on humans are very rare; I definitely exaggerated that fact. There is, however, one particularly (in)famous instance, in the remakes of the original games, where a little girl goes missing. Her worried father sends you to find her, as he works on Two Island, but lives on Three, and his daughter usually brings him lunch via the ferry. When you get there, not only has a biker gang taken over the docks, but nobody's seen the girl. You later find her, in the deepest part of the forest. A Hypno had lured her there.Maclennan said:The games I played had hardly any information on the eating other pokemon or killing people. In gold/silver you can buy a slowpokes tail as an item you can feed to your pokemon and for fun hunting for an easter egg i fed one to my slowpoke, unfortunately the programers never though to make an easter egg for such a devious act.MajoraPersona said:Pokemon cannibalism? As in, Pokemon eating each other (which isn't really cannibalism), or Pidgeot eating Pidgey? There's quite a difference, since each is supposed to be a different species. Plus, in the former case, it's well known they eat each other; half the pokedex entries are about how many pokemon that one eats (the other half are about how much the species in question kills people).Maclennan said:Really I just threw that in to to see how many people i could hook into talking about childhood icons like veal in the freezer. Also Pokemon cannibalism was worked into one reply.MajoraPersona said:Ba dum.HankMan said:I think I know why Yahtzee really doesn't like Pokemon.
It's because he hates going to the gym!
But seriously, I also hated the anorexic supermodel gym leader. Mainly because I kept using my water starter (bearded samurai that dual weilds shell swords). In fact, I forget how I beat her, since I kinda beat the game on the Tuesday after it came out (on a Sunday).
Why would he need to cover that? People have eaten pokemon since the original games (Farfetch'd?). It just doesn't come up much.Maclennan said:Heres the question he missed, what do the people in that world eat since every animal and most of the damn plants are pokemon?
I think a miltank would be quite tasty. Pikachu would probably be kind of stringy. They will probably resort to "iceberg lebtuce" soon.
Anyway, I disagree with some points in the video. First of all, when making a pokemon, you don't just change one letter in the name. You have to make it punny. Furthermore, video games typically ignore people who aren't involved in the subject matter (how many people in a Harvest Moon game don't live in a quiet farming town and do farming related things?). Besides, the whole 'these are our pets' thing makes the 'lots of people are affected' aspect a bit easier to swallow.
You can catch the pokemon on the cover, but both of them were involved in the backstory. They used to be the exact same pokemon (supposedly), but split when the heroes got into a big disagreement. The version colour is, to my understanding, the colour of the one that won that battle; In Black, the black dragon won. In other words, you get the loser of the ancient battle.Biodeamon said:I can't tell what i'm buying black or white for. the legendary on the front is black but the background is white...am i buying the thing for the cover art or the pokemon on the cover?! i wish they'd stick to the old layout where you've got a precious gem as the title, a legendary pokemon in the front and a shiny background in the back.
It's like playing rock-paper-scissors with two hands instead of one. There's more going on, but it's still the same game.Ace IV said:All of that is just adding new features. None of it actually changes the way the game is played. Rock-paper-scissors, turn-based combat. It hasn't budged an inch.BlackSnow said:stuff
Did I mention Super Mario Sunshine before? That's a fundamental change to gameplay that adds new dimensions. It's not simply a new temporary power-up, it introduced concepts and puzzles that would have not been possible without it.
Both those pokemon have a 50/50 chance of being male female (in comparison to the usual 87.5/12.5 percent).kingofcrash63 said:(F)13.yeah but you can't..."catch" a puzzle like most MALE trainers "catch" a gardivior/lopunny......for there own "reasons"
This is Trueemeraldrafael said:Both those pokemon have a 50/50 chance of being male female (in comparison to the usual 87.5/12.5 percent).kingofcrash63 said:(F)13.yeah but you can't..."catch" a puzzle like most MALE trainers "catch" a gardivior/lopunny......for there own "reasons"