SG Xibalba said:
solidstatemind said:
I ROFL'd at the blackface comment. And at the risk of dipping my toes in the sucking vortex of meaningless internet debate, I had no problem with either that or the use of the word '******'. (yeah, I laughed at that too)
Well, I guess that says a whole lot about you then really doesn't it.
There is a line, and there are a smattering of things in this review that are somewhat overstepping it - it's not just the use of the word '******', it's the context of how it was used. But i'm guessing that went way over your head too.
You talk about missing the point, but you are the one who missed my point, ironically; or perhaps that was your exact intention. Rather than allow you to cling to your those assumptions which 'justify' your 'outrage' let me explain what I meant for you:
If there were a
pattern of offensive behavior by
anyone (not just Yahtzee, since I can see you reaching into your pocket to pull out the "hey you're just a fanboi defending the object of your affection" argument), then by all means people should address it. However, despite YOUR knee-jerk reaction to the word, it actually was used in an appropriate context- despite your worst-case interpretation, as BobIsOnlyBob points out above in post #179.
So, what- exactly- does that knee-jerk reaction and immediate condemnation of the single incidence of a word that YOU happen to find offensive get you? Well, to be blunt, nothing more than a tempest in a teapot, at least this time (thank god). What bothers me is that it could've been worse, and all because you felt you had the right to be the ultimate judge of someone else's intentions, and then took it even further, you felt you were justified to be the avatar of outrage against this 'heinous crime'.
Do you have the right to be offended? I never said you didn't. Hate speech is evil, it sucks, and it should be stopped. However, rushing to judgement is just as bad, and in many ways, telling Yahtzee not to use a word because you don't like it is essentially an attempt to engage in a form of censorship. If the person who originally complained had said "That was mean and you suck" I wouldn't have said a thing-- people get torqued out about the goofiest stuff sometimes, and this was at least a psuedo-legitimate reason for upset. (Unlike the standard fanboi 'U teh Suxxors becuz U don't lik '). But the moment that they asked Yahtzee to change his behavior to suit their own personal preferences, well, that's when you cross that particular line of Political Correctness, 'Right Think/Speak', etc. ad naseaum.
Ultimately, in my opinion, it's part of our personal responsibility as adults to not just blindly react like 2-year-olds (or other manifestations of pure id) to something we
initially find off-putting or offensive, especially when it comes to media and art; most things in life are subject to personal interpretation and art is inherently so. It is not only possible but probable that the viewer does not know exactly what the author or creator's exact intent truly was for certain, and if you don't know for sure, how can you condemn them for it? The answer can not be anything other than "you can't" unless there has been a pattern of behavior to support the negative interpretation. That's just being a mature and rational adult. We realize that the world doesn't revolve around us, and that our perceptions and desires do not define reality. Well, unless your a solipsist, that is.
That is what I was trying to get at. And if you can't grasp that, I can't help you: I can't be any more explicit than that.
Oh, and respect to BobIsOnlyBob for a very lucid post that covers a couple of other very salient points.