Zombies have too much lore behind them and they are fundamentally a ridiculous concept which I think anyone trying to create a sense of realism would be best avoiding. The thing is - they weren't the living dead and a pivotal part of the plot is that there could be a cure for the infection. How can you cure death? We know they are basically zombies - the writers know they are zombies. We don't need to call them zombies though because it's just silly for a world to acknowledge the idea of a mythical creature like that.Mick P. said:I think the plant zombies is a fresh idea. It's really weird that its never been done before. I think Yahtzee would've praised it if they were called "zombies" in game. But it sounds like the game keeps saying "infected" over and over instead of just using the natural word for zombie.
Sure we use "zombie" all the time to mean a braindead person but there is also the monster that is a "zombie" that is some slow walking dead freak that only wants to eat human flesh and in this context we think of the latter. If someone had some weird plant disease that may them crazy I wouldn't call them zombies and I think it's way more hokey for a character in a story to acknowledge that these zombies used to be a fantasy monster from horror films but are now real monsters they have to face. It's silly and it robs the enemies of any humanity and it raises a bunch of question about what the enemies are. If the enemies are called Zombies I assume something supernatural has happened in the world and that magic exists. If they are infected I know the world is like my own for the most part.Mick P. said:No no. Zombie is a word. It's not a mythological creature. If you have something that acts like a zombie its a zombie. Even if its your dog who found a beer on the ground. Its hokey writing to call these things anything but zombies. Maybe to doctors first on the scene they are "infected" but realism, if you are a survivor, two days later, these things are zombies. It's unrealistic to call them anything else.
I like Yahtzee's analyses, so it's disappointing to so him totally shrug something off because of he's a knee-jerk reactionary. It won't affect my perception of the game, but it will affect my likelihood to read and watch interesting material about the game written by Yahtzee.runujhkj said:Wait. Yahtzee, a man whose legacy depends on him disliking popular games, blew a popular game's faults out of proportion? Let me get my fainting couch. I never understood why people need to defend their favorite games from this guy. I've played Last of Us four or five times now, and I still got a pretty good laugh out of this video. Who cares? It's not even a question of "but then people won't buy it as much" anymore, because the game's already sold better than Bioshock Infinite did across both consoles, and it's a PS3 exclusive.
Live and let live, people. Unless you're the type of person who's just now saying "Well, now that I know Yahtzee doesn't like it, I can safely disregard it." That kind of person is an idiot. So you've seen all the universal acclaim this game has gotten and, despite the fact that it came from all kinds of sources (if you don't like IGN or Gamespot, why not look at Edge, which has only given a perfect score 10 or so times in its entire existence?), you decided that the only thing that mattered was the 4-minute humorous opinion of a snarky British man? You're an idiot.
Well what is the point of a comment section of a review if not to agree or disagree with the points raised in the review? I also don't think it's a case of Yahtzee shitting on anything popular. He liked Bioshock Ifinite and that had much much bigger flaws than this and in general his comments on games seem a bit more fair and a bit more relevant. This isn't another mindless CoD game. It has good writing, a great game world and uses the videogame medium to tell the story very well. He just ignored all that to laugh at some minor issues with the gameplay and then said he didn't get the ending as though he were 11 years old.runujhkj said:Wait. Yahtzee, a man whose legacy depends on him disliking popular games, blew a popular game's faults out of proportion? Let me get my fainting couch. I never understood why people need to defend their favorite games from this guy. I've played Last of Us four or five times now, and I still got a pretty good laugh out of this video. Who cares? It's not even a question of "but then people won't buy it as much" anymore, because the game's already sold better than Bioshock Infinite did across both consoles, and it's a PS3 exclusive.
Live and let live, people. Unless you're the type of person who's just now saying "Well, now that I know Yahtzee doesn't like it, I can safely disregard it." That kind of person is an idiot. So you've seen all the universal acclaim this game has gotten and, despite the fact that it came from all kinds of sources (if you don't like IGN or Gamespot, why not look at Edge, which has only given a perfect score 10 or so times in its entire existence?), you decided that the only thing that mattered was the 4-minute humorous opinion of a snarky British man? You're an idiot.
It was kind of annoying to see him treat the Uncharted series so flippantly, even though I don't like it equally as much as him, but superficial critiques are more valid for a superficial game. The Last of Us wasn't anywhere near as superficial as Uncharted was though, so it's a shame to see him treating them as though they're basically the same game.wyldefire said:Typical Yahtzee review of a Naughty Dog game. Lot's of superficial critiques and asides, little discussion about the core game, bile for bile's sake since he finds giving positive reviews of well reviewed games boring.
And then in several months he'll off handedly mention something about the game that was "revelatory" like he did with Uncharted 2. Because it is a fantastic game.
It is strange that he didn't grasp the meaning of the ending the ending though. Seems like just about everyone but him understood why Joel made the choice he did at the end, and thematically he's not all that different than the protagonist of Spec Ops: The Line, which was Yahtzee's GOTY last year.
But whatever, cue the fanboys, who had already made up their mind to hate this game because it's a Sony exclusive or because it's just cool to hate on AAA games, storming comment sections using this as "proof" that The Last of Us is bad or overrated.
Hmm, I wouldn't be surprised if what your friends say is actually the truth, for I too had encountered such situations. And, since AI is in, um, lower grades of intelligence, I stopped playing this game after about 20 times Ellie was noticed by a zombie (yes, those are zombies, pop-culture).Eternal_Lament said:I've mentioned this before on other forums, but I think the friendly AI "safety" is determined by difficulty. I played it on normal and found that, yeah, enemies would never notice Ellie or my other allies, but my friends that played it on hard said he opposite, that enemies would not only notice, but sometimes the friendly AI would jump out and fire, breaking stealth, if they felt it was necessary.
That implies that this is a review rather than a comedy video. Occasionally he reviews games. This is not one of those. How comprehensive can a "review" be in the span of 5 minutes, when it also has to be comedic as well? Not to mention how much of the video was talking about Uncharted, making it entirely irrelevant.TurkeyProphet said:Well what is the point of a comment section of a review if not to agree or disagree with the points raised in the review?runujhkj said:Wait. Yahtzee, a man whose legacy depends on him disliking popular games, blew a popular game's faults out of proportion? Let me get my fainting couch. I never understood why people need to defend their favorite games from this guy. I've played Last of Us four or five times now, and I still got a pretty good laugh out of this video. Who cares? It's not even a question of "but then people won't buy it as much" anymore, because the game's already sold better than Bioshock Infinite did across both consoles, and it's a PS3 exclusive.
Live and let live, people. Unless you're the type of person who's just now saying "Well, now that I know Yahtzee doesn't like it, I can safely disregard it." That kind of person is an idiot. So you've seen all the universal acclaim this game has gotten and, despite the fact that it came from all kinds of sources (if you don't like IGN or Gamespot, why not look at Edge, which has only given a perfect score 10 or so times in its entire existence?), you decided that the only thing that mattered was the 4-minute humorous opinion of a snarky British man? You're an idiot.
If a work of art is only as good as its deepest flaw, then why would Yahtzee only discuss tiny irrelevant "flaws" in this game? "The protagonists aren't good people" isn't a flaw, it's the entire point of the last half of the game.Mick P. said:If you are as equally cynical as Yahtzee about 21st century commercial games and don't have a lot of time to waste on stinker games then his reviews hold a lot of water. Besides. A work of art is only as good as its deepest flaw. Clearly Yahtzee wants to appreciate games as works of art. Not knifing simulators.runujhkj said:Wait. Yahtzee, a man whose legacy depends on him disliking popular games, blew a popular game's faults out of proportion? Let me get my fainting couch. I never understood why people need to defend their favorite games from this guy. I've played Last of Us four or five times now, and I still got a pretty good laugh out of this video. Who cares? It's not even a question of "but then people won't buy it as much" anymore, because the game's already sold better than Bioshock Infinite did across both consoles, and it's a PS3 exclusive.
Live and let live, people. Unless you're the type of person who's just now saying "Well, now that I know Yahtzee doesn't like it, I can safely disregard it." That kind of person is an idiot. So you've seen all the universal acclaim this game has gotten and, despite the fact that it came from all kinds of sources (if you don't like IGN or Gamespot, why not look at Edge, which has only given a perfect score 10 or so times in its entire existence?), you decided that the only thing that mattered was the 4-minute humorous opinion of a snarky British man? You're an idiot.
EDITED/PS: I am 100% mindmeld with Yahtzee on his general stance, and probably would be on his opinions too if I had to actually play these games. So its not just hyperbole. At least one other person exists with the same psychology and it isn't an act.
No that is the primary meaning of the word "chimera" although it is used in other context. I'm not sure what your point is with that anyway. Zombies have connotations of witchcraft and magic in our modern meaning of the word. People would not start calling sick people "Zombies" unless they were being cynical or humorous. I have no idea why you think they would. I certainly wouldn't call my sick mother a zombie and since the infected weren't actually zombies doing so would add a level of camp that is associated with zombie films and would make it confusing because they aren't zombies but they are being ironically called zombies by he jaded characters.Mick P. said:Well you are wrong then. A chimera doesn't mean a mythical creature. These are modern words with modern meanings in modern dictionaries. So if you were writing the game people would be complaining about the awkward characters not speaking in plain English. I'm not trying to be offensive. But its these misconceptions that lead to bad writing.
Unless these plant things don't act like zombies. Were this to happen in a real life scenario, everybody would refer to them as zombies and nothing else. It doesn't mean they come from Haiti because that's where the word zombie actually comes from. It's not even a mythological word. It's a modern word. Probably not even know to the western world until sometime mid 20th century.
Being dehumanized by the characters' actions is a core element of the story. He was dehumanized by playing as Captain Walker, so why is he unable to wrap his mind around a game making him do bad things?Mick P. said:Just replying to not appear rude. I don't know. If he only brings up petty flaws then maybe that's a backhanded complement. That's up to you. As are flaws. As for why Yahtzee would bring that up. Probably because he had a hard time relating. He felt dehumanized playing the parts. I can't say for sure because I haven't played the game.runujhkj said:If a work of art is only as good as its deepest flaw, then why would Yahtzee only discuss tiny irrelevant "flaws" in this game? "The protagonists aren't good people" isn't a flaw, it's the entire point of the last half of the game.Mick P. said:If you are as equally cynical as Yahtzee about 21st century commercial games and don't have a lot of time to waste on stinker games then his reviews hold a lot of water. Besides. A work of art is only as good as its deepest flaw. Clearly Yahtzee wants to appreciate games as works of art. Not knifing simulators.runujhkj said:Wait. Yahtzee, a man whose legacy depends on him disliking popular games, blew a popular game's faults out of proportion? Let me get my fainting couch. I never understood why people need to defend their favorite games from this guy. I've played Last of Us four or five times now, and I still got a pretty good laugh out of this video. Who cares? It's not even a question of "but then people won't buy it as much" anymore, because the game's already sold better than Bioshock Infinite did across both consoles, and it's a PS3 exclusive.
Live and let live, people. Unless you're the type of person who's just now saying "Well, now that I know Yahtzee doesn't like it, I can safely disregard it." That kind of person is an idiot. So you've seen all the universal acclaim this game has gotten and, despite the fact that it came from all kinds of sources (if you don't like IGN or Gamespot, why not look at Edge, which has only given a perfect score 10 or so times in its entire existence?), you decided that the only thing that mattered was the 4-minute humorous opinion of a snarky British man? You're an idiot.
EDITED/PS: I am 100% mindmeld with Yahtzee on his general stance, and probably would be on his opinions too if I had to actually play these games. So its not just hyperbole. At least one other person exists with the same psychology and it isn't an act.
She will assist you in fights by throwing bricks and bottles at enemies heads and even stabbing enemies if your already going through an execution and the enemy sees you.Yuuki said:Wait, if Ellie is of bugger-all use in gameplay and essentially invisible to zombies then why is she even there?
So the devs could stick a female character on the front cover to score an easy win with the "moar female protagonists!" parade?