Agreed. While there's something to be said for finishing watching a movie/playing a game/reading a book, if you found the beginning of these things so appalling that you can't even bother to finish it, that doesn't exclude you from giving an opinion about it.D_987 said:That's an argument I see time and again and I'm not seeing it. If a game is still boring, after the supposed 5 hours he played it, critic or not, there's more than needed justification not to continue playing. If, in the first 5 hours, a game is poor - then it's a poor game overall, however you put it - and FFXIII doesn't change until the 30th hour and even then it goes straight back to the same style of gameplay shortly after introducing a single open space.LackingSaint said:I'd say that stopping halfway is really really bad for a critic since they're essentially supposed to dissect and review the ENTIRE product, and there are plenty of great games with bad openings. But then Yahtzee has always been a satirist and not a critic so.
EDIT: I played Final Fantasy XIII about a few hours longer than Yahtzee did, being more of a Final Fantasy fan, and still gave up on that game. It was dull, lifeless drivel with characters we never even get to know until about two hours in (and I ended up not wanting to know once they got around to that), that required no thought beyond pushing the stick forward, and then pressing x when you got to fight something. It's the first game in the series that I despised.