I've read that George Lucas is the luckiest, most successful mediocrity of all time (See Radioland Murders and Howard the Duck). Even if he had a plan for the OG trilogy, it went sideways. Ford was bitching for some unfathonable reason that seems to go beyond simply agitating for more money. ITMT, people saw him as the romantic lead, not Luke. And where the heck did the idea to make Darth Vader Luke's father come from? Lucas would say that Darth Vader is a play on the term, Dark Father. BS. Sounds more like Dark Invader. But it worked out despite any shade one might throw Return of the Jedi. I think the prequels were planned out. And they were not good enough, nor did they justify Vader's redemption arc. (The books did a better job with a sort of do over with, I think, Ben Solo.) Still, for them have to taken a multi billion dollar property and not even planning it out? That was crazy. Just cuz George lucked out with a near indy film in the 1970s doesn't mean one should try it again today.
No story survives encountering reality. Nevermind just the simple fact of the creator doing revisions in their head as a natural part of the creative process, which could change things midstream, (I've had this happen with 2 different novels I am trying to write. where a side character has become more the central focus of my narrative, without really meaning to.), to limitations of technology and budget. To dealing with actors and executives, location disputes and problems, and a myriad of other things. I have no problem with the idea that the stories changed drastically between films, because they did course corrections based on audience feedback, dealing with troubled actors, I doubt Carrie Fisher, being at the height of her coke addiction at that time, was a joy to work with, and apparently Ford was a diva a lot too. Also perhaps realizing that there was no chemistry between Fisher and Mark....possibly because at that time Carrie was actively fucking Ford, so it was a lot easier for them to swoon at each other on camera. Just, a myriad clusterfuck.I've read that George Lucas is the luckiest, most successful mediocrity of all time (See Radioland Murders and Howard the Duck). Even if he had a plan for the OG trilogy, it went sideways. Ford was bitching for some unfathonable reason that seems to go beyond simply agitating for more money. ITMT, people saw him as the romantic lead, not Luke. And where the heck did the idea to make Darth Vader Luke's father come from? Lucas would say that Darth Vader is a play on the term, Dark Father. BS. Sounds more like Dark Invader. But it worked out despite any shade one might throw Return of the Jedi. I think the prequels were planned out. And they were not good enough, nor did they justify Vader's redemption arc. (The books did a better job with a sort of do over with, I think, Ben Solo.) Still, for them have to taken a multi billion dollar property and not even planning it out? That was crazy. Just cuz George lucked out with a near indy film in the 1970s doesn't mean one should try it again today.
Never mind a trilogy. I read the OG script for 40 year old Virgin. In it, for instance, he was supposed to be a buff body builder. As not having a relationship, he distracted himself with weight lifting. I think Pretty Woman ODs and dies in that script. Rocky dies ala "The Champ" too. And more. So, things go sideways in a single story. Tons of movies have alternative endings.No story survives encountering reality. Nevermind just the simple fact of the creator doing revisions in their head as a natural part of the creative process, which could change things midstream, (I've had this happen with 2 different novels I am trying to write. where a side character has become more the central focus of my narrative, without really meaning to.), to limitations of technology and budget. To dealing with actors and executives, location disputes and problems, and a myriad of other things. I have no problem with the idea that the stories changed drastically between films, because they did course corrections based on audience feedback, dealing with troubled actors, I doubt Carrie Fisher, being at the height of her coke addiction at that time, was a joy to work with, and apparently Ford was a diva a lot too. Also perhaps realizing that there was no chemistry between Fisher and Mark....possibly because at that time Carrie was actively fucking Ford, so it was a lot easier for them to swoon at each other on camera. Just, a myriad clusterfuck.
I mean I can even believe that he had a "trilogy" planned out in his head. But, that's a really nebulous thing, compared to actually writing it out. Again, *I* I have TWO different trilogies of stories, in my head, that I have "plotted out." But, I mean that's at best, an outline. These key, signature plot points have a basic framework in my head, that's it. I know I want to steer the story to those specific events. But all the twists and turns along the way, that shit gets fleshed out as I'm literally writing it, chapter by chapter, with significant alterations that can pop up mid-sentence. So if he said something like "Yeah I had this image of Luke, standing side by side with Vader, facing a dark robed wizard on a throne....." yeah, I can buy that. How they got there, why they joined forces, etc? No he probably had no clue. But, those kind of little image kernels, those are the things that, at least for me anyway, give birth to the story. A random bit of creative brainstorming, a dramatic image flutters into my brain, and then my brain starts back filling. "Who are these people? Why are they in this situation? What is the conflict going on?" etc etc. This cascade Q&A eventually fleshes out the larger framework, that becomes the story. But, at first, it's just something as small as a young man with a green saber, standing next to a samurai in black armor with a red saber, facing off against a grinning corpse, sitting on a throne in a sea of stars.
Oh I know, like I said, I've experienced that first hand with 2 first novels I'm futzing about with. Initially, Character A was the protagonist, and I had a framework of the overall plot around them. Character B was an important supporting character....who I had a cool idea for...and another cool idea...and another...and....wait...why isn't Character B the main protagonist at this point? Because all my cool story beats are about them at this point. That was one book, well 2 different first books. But before I even started writing it, I had the idea for the trilogy's meta-arc already in mind. That arc, blooming in my head, was the initial kernel of inspiration. That's all I meant by believing he "had a trilogy in mind" when he was writing the first script for Movie 1. That can be entirely true, but also be the most barebones of outlines. Thus making it also entirely true, that he had no idea what was going to happen, in the moment to moment details, with movies 2&3, and having those details, drastically change, from movie to movie.Never mind a trilogy. I read the OG script for 40 year old Virgin. In it, for instance, he was supposed to be a buff body builder. As not having a relationship, he distracted himself with weight lifting. I think Pretty Woman ODs and dies in that script. Rocky dies ala "The Champ" too. And more. So, things go sideways in a single story. Tons of movies have alternative endings.
Given that doesn't sound very good to me, as summarized at least, I'm glad it didn't go that way.So, before writing a script, they often do a "treatment". Its more like 20-30 pages to outline a story. I'd heard Abrahms did have one for Episode 8 in which Rae is not a Mary Sue, but being guided from afar by Luke Skywalker, when he took time from his wife and kids to send her some guidance with the intent she eventually get to him with his light saber. Well. That idea went sideways.
Edit: fun pic
One of my favorite things from Prime Video.ZeroZeroZero
Excellent series about international drug trade that ties together an Italian mob family(the customer), the Mexican drug cartel(the supplier) and a family business freight company(the broker). As you would expect things go wrong by betrayals and power grabs but it's all wonderfully told and delivered. It specifically shows how drug trade can corrupt entire societies due to the obscene amounts of money involved. And what happens when entire elements from the state's security apparatus become too seduced by all that cash. And the range of people involved in facilitating the trade from business people to officials to hardened criminals to jihadis. Those Mexican guys in particular just absolutely stop at nothing. Paradoxically the more they try to clamp down on drug trade the more lucrative it becomes. The all powerful supply & demand. I hope they make a second season because it was just really good.
They did a comic adaptation of the original ideas behind Star Wars, I think its just called The Star Wars. Honestly, differences are night and day.I've read that George Lucas is the luckiest, most successful mediocrity of all time (See Radioland Murders and Howard the Duck). Even if he had a plan for the OG trilogy, it went sideways. Ford was bitching for some unfathonable reason that seems to go beyond simply agitating for more money. ITMT, people saw him as the romantic lead, not Luke. And where the heck did the idea to make Darth Vader Luke's father come from? Lucas would say that Darth Vader is a play on the term, Dark Father. BS. Sounds more like Dark Invader. But it worked out despite any shade one might throw Return of the Jedi. I think the prequels were planned out. And they were not good enough, nor did they justify Vader's redemption arc. (The books did a better job with a sort of do over with, I think, Ben Solo.) Still, for them have to taken a multi billion dollar property and not even planning it out? That was crazy. Just cuz George lucked out with a near indy film in the 1970s doesn't mean one should try it again today.
I never had an issue with their relationship, in fact, Simon's devotion to his sister, is one of my favorite parts of that show. He's a wonderful contradiction over the course of the series. He's this very prim, proper, upright fellow, from the core worlds, but...he LOVES his sister. She's the single point of "family and home" he has in the universe. And he loved her enough, to give up everything to help her. It's his one Hulk Smash button in the entire show. Most things, he's more than happy to negotiate, discuss, acquiesce to another's desire on how to do something, but if River's safety is in question, all bets are off. He's trying to find his place in this chaotic new world, but also trying to fix his sister, with the most basic of medical care. I love Simon and River, Simon in particular.Only thing that sort of makes me look twice is Simon and River's relationship. I get it, they're brother and sister and they love each other and she's been really badly hurt and he's gone to help her but something just seems off about the way they interact. Could be because of River's more child like state thanks to her, as Jayne colourfully puts it, moonbrain.
Still worth a watch.
IMDB has "Our Mrs. Reynolds" at episode 3. Don't know why. Probably my favorite episode of the series.They did a comic adaptation of the original ideas behind Star Wars, I think its just called The Star Wars. Honestly, differences are night and day.
Anywho, Firefly.
I'm up to episode six, "Our Mrs. Reynolds", and its aged pretty well for the most part. The sci-fi western vibe is easy to get on and groove with, every actor is well cast (though Nathan Fillion steals the show and runs around with it) and the sound/set/costume design has a delightfully earthy appeal to it. Of course the standout takeaway is the dialogue which even for (the fallen from grace) Joss Whedon is remarkably snappy and full of a sort of pseudo western flair.
Only thing that sort of makes me look twice is Simon and River's relationship. I get it, they're brother and sister and they love each other and she's been really badly hurt and he's gone to help her but something just seems off about the way they interact. Could be because of River's more child like state thanks to her, as Jayne colourfully puts it, moonbrain.
Still worth a watch.
They did deliberately air them out of order originally, for reasons that were never given, IIRC.IMDB has "Our Mrs. Reynolds" at episode 3. Don't know why. Probably my favorite episode of the series.
I felt like Snow in the Desert could have been some weird prequel to Pop Squad. Maybe Snow got caught and dissected at one point and that's how they made the immortal juice. Not that it changes anything whether they were connected or not.Love, Death and Robots: Season 2-
It was entertaining, though only two of the features really stuck out to me. "Automated Customer Service" which is a woman fighting her Roomba which basically had the "Evil" switch accidently turned on and is a wonderful bit of Dark Comedy and kinda reminded me of Wall-E but if the robots tried to kill people. The other was "The Drowned Giant" which was slow and contemplative and I just kinda dug it. I half wondered if there was gonna be a surprise twist at the end, but nope, it's just contemplations of a dead giant that washing up on a beach and where it came from is never explained.
"Pop Squad" felt just fucking brutal and while interesting, it's really hard to watch. A lot of the worldbuilding was cut which would have made it stand out a lot more. "Life Hutch" felt like it needed more somehow, it's not bad but I feel like I've seen this before quite a few times. "Tall Grass" feels like an SCP entry that's been professionally animated. "Snow in the Desert" was kinda interesting but feels like it needed more worldbuilding. "Ice" is just kinda there and it's fine. "All through the house" is, I guess an unique take on Santa Claus.