At the CIA and NSA's request most likely. You know people are really stupid with shit they put on Social Media? I'm guessing they (the Intelligence services) want the Taliban on there because the amount of free intel it will net them is worth millions of dollars and they're getting it for peanuts in analytical labour for stuff they can read for free. Its fucking diabolical in a way.Twitter has confirmed that the Taliban will still be allowed on the platform
Twitter says Taliban can stay on platform if they obey rules
In a statement, Twitter ducked the question of whether it would bar representatives of the Taliban’s Islamic fundamentalist government from getting their message out.nypost.com
Twitter which has banned countless people for even so much as being slightly too right leaning, apparently is okay with the "death to america" people because they are saying it in a strangely friendly way.
And yet social media leader insist that they do not do anything to influence politics. It is just a total coincidence that they ban a lot of right leaning people. It has nothing to do with people expressing political opinions on a platform designed for people to specifically share their dumbass ideas in a quick and easy format.At the CIA and NSA's request most likely. You know people are really stupid with shit they put on Social Media? I'm guessing they (the Intelligence services) want the Taliban on there because the amount of free intel it will net them is worth millions of dollars and they're getting it for peanuts in analytical labour for stuff they can read for free. Its fucking diabolical in a way.
They ban a lot of left leaning people too dude. The line seems to be "looks like they're publicly advocating murder"And yet social media leader insist that they do not do anything to influence politics. It is just a total coincidence that they ban a lot of right leaning people. It has nothing to do with people expressing political opinions on a platform designed for people to specifically share their dumbass ideas in a quick and easy format.
The tradwife movement will be stoked.
Apart from his horrid personality many of his scandals are really not that shocking. The corruption ones at least. Irish politicians have been very publicly lining their pockets for decades, like they don't try to hide it, never have. They've always openly sneered at anyone who tried to call them out. Britain seems to be in the same boat with the "whose mate got that contract".I thought Trump had very little chance of going down as the worst ever US president... that is, right up until he inspired a mob to storm the Capitol. But I think even then he's safe, because it takes one hell of a screw up to surpass zero leadership whilst your country is heading towards outright civil war.
I feel confident Trump will probably sit in the bottom quartile. He combines l
zero notable achievements together with what will probably be remembered as a botched pandemic response and a great deal of scandal and rancour. Historians do not look kindly upon that sort of record.
It is never not cringy though.You guys realize ISIS used memes targeting western chan dudes all the fucking time, right? Like, this is extremely not new.
Fiery but mostly peaceful death-threats.Twitter has confirmed that the Taliban will still be allowed on the platform
Twitter says Taliban can stay on platform if they obey rules
In a statement, Twitter ducked the question of whether it would bar representatives of the Taliban’s Islamic fundamentalist government from getting their message out.nypost.com
Twitter which has banned countless people for even so much as being slightly too right leaning, apparently is okay with the "death to america" people because they are saying it in a strangely friendly way.
A night where only two people died and one of those deaths was if health issues is not going to rank highly to historians. The guy that will have the military on their side and seizes control with trained soldiers will be the one we consider the worst. Or maybe not; they will be the one writing the history books after all.I thought Trump had very little chance of going down as the worst ever US president... that is, right up until he inspired a mob to storm the Capitol. But I think even then he's safe, because it takes one hell of a screw up to surpass zero leadership whilst your country is heading towards outright civil war.
I feel confident Trump will probably sit in the bottom quartile. He combines approximately zero notable achievements together with what will probably be remembered as a botched pandemic response and a great deal of scandal and rancour. Historians do not look kindly upon that sort of record.
So pretty much what Trump proposed for handling the BLM protests...
Taliban don't tolerate protests. You protest peacefully, you will be shot. You protest violently, you will be shot. You try to go to school, you will be shot.
"We would go into villages and enrol people into this biometric data system," US Marine Special Operations Command veteran Peter Kiernan recalls.
"You had a device about 12 inches by six inches wide. It would scan their fingerprints, it would scan their retina, it would also take a picture of them."
And the giant stores of biometric data collected by both the US military and the Afghan government could, some argue, pose a risk to those facing reprisals.
He said it was useful in identifying bomb-makers, while it was also used to confirm the identities of contractors and locals working with the US military.
On Tuesday, news site the Intercept said military sources had told it that some HIIDE devices had fallen into Taliban hands, while Reuters reported a Kabul resident saying the Taliban were making house-to-house inspections using a "biometrics machine".
However in a surprise move as Twitter allows the Taliban to preach on the social mediaAn Afghan official told NewScientist biometric infrastructure was now in the hands of the Taliban.
Facebook has brought in new safety measures for users worried for their safety in Afghanistan, as the Taliban continue to cement their grip on power.
The firm says it "removed the ability to view and search the 'Friends' list for Facebook accounts in Afghanistan" to protect people from being targeted.
Professional networking site LinkedIn has also taken steps by hiding the connections of anyone in the country.
I guess if you stress to your society how important is to fight domestic islamic extremism, and then you welcome islamic extremists from a neighboring country with open hands, it will spark confusion.Apparently, the Chinese government underestimated their people support of the Taliban
China’s Warm Welcome for Taliban Sparks Backlash at Home
China is struggling at home to sell the Taliban as a suitable partner for a country waging a war on alleged Islamic extremism, as it prepares to embrace an Afghanistan led by the militant group.www.bloomberg.com
The Chinese people are not happy with their government supporting the Taliban.
The fact of the Chinese government is getting major backlash from this is a big deal, all the other stuff like Hong Kong, cleaning other people's sea territory, or persecution of Muslims did not get huge backlash but this did. I recommend reading the article because it's really interesting.
edit:
Two killed in suicide bombing targeting Chinese nationals in southwest Pakistan
PAKISTAN-BLAST/ (URGENT):Two killed in suicide bombing targeting Chinese nationals in southwest Pakistannews.trust.org
does not help this also happened
I understand this is an overused comparison but this reminds me of 1984 where the dictatorial state went from supporting to being against a certain power overnight.I guess if you stress to your society how important is to fight domestic islamic extremism, and then you welcome islamic extremists from a neighboring country with open hands, it will spark confusion.
Especially if you've also suffered a good number of terror attacks by the aforementioned extremists.I guess if you stress to your society how important is to fight domestic islamic extremism, and then you welcome islamic extremists from a neighboring country with open hands, it will spark confusion.
It's not clear that they're less knowledgeable or less manipulated by their media than we are.I understand this is an overused comparison but this reminds me of 1984 where the dictatorial state went from supporting to being against a certain power overnight.
The thing is while the Chinese people are closed off from a lot of information they are not mindless drones, stupid, or goldfish, they will remember what they were told yesterday.