Yeah, sure. That's why, during Covid sell out rushes, gluten free stuff was still left on the shelves or the very last to leave. Because they are so profitable. Or maybe you mean the companies that charge 5 times the amount of normal food. Which... sure. So profitable
Maybe where you are.
In the whole "There may be problems ahead period" just before UK lockdowns started some of the gluten free stuff was running low. I ended up picking up potato pasta just incase at one point.
You want to know why the gluten free stuff was left on the shelf and people rushed to buy everything else?
1) Most people don't realise about gluten free stuff so likely went to their normal places to get the products not the gluten free sections / areas.
2) It tends to taste worse than normal stuff anyway.
Anyway, let's take your analogy again. Since there is transphobes, we would also have glutenphobes. These would be the people that shout THERE ARE FOUR LIGHTS and pretend they have a point. Despite showing evidence that being gluten intolerant is real they would just say 2+2=4 and ignore what rhe science actually says. Because, just because you LOOK like every other human, doesn't mean you dont have a medical condition. They would just say, 'there's no such thing as gluten free
There are people who claim there isn't such a thing as Gluten intolerance lol. You probably hoped that was just some insane idea but no it's a thing.
2+2 does = 4 in almost every circumstance when you don't change the actual question. There were 4 lights.
Should the edge cases mean we must redefine reality to account for them?
if a kid puts 2+2= 17,000,000 on a test must we mark it right because under weird edge case rules it could be?
The world only functions due to accepted concepts of reality and how things are. Your example doesn't work because Gluten intolerance is a thing.
The argument that I'm not sure why you're not understanding is in reality we don't change all the rules for everyone because of the edge cases that don't follow it normally.
In my example you would have to eat gluten free food merely because I also do. Thus in my example you must accept 2+2 = 17,000,000 is the right answer because you're accounting for everyone to be included at the same time.
Then they would ban you from bathrooms because there is a chsnce that someone will pretend to be gluten free and raped someone
I wonder when transphobes will realise that THEY were the one saying gender was 2+2=5. They pretend their version of gender was real and now we know its not.
Lastly, I would also really love people to stop pretending that asking for certain pronouns is 'changing the world'. It's changing one thing. Stop making it an apocalypse
Ok on the gender argument that's a great way to give the TERFs more ammo to just throw out Gender at all and go back to Sex genotype and or phenotype.
Lastly I'd love the world to get back in touch with reality and make it so for example Jessica Yaniv couldn't sue for discrimination because a gynaecologist wouldn't example her balls