Goal posting as always. He never stops.See what I mean? He can't help himself.
Goal posting as always. He never stops.See what I mean? He can't help himself.
Yes, yes, you're very persecuted, we know.Oh look you declared victory by your own rules just like I literally predicted you would.
Funny how awfully predictable you are. Maybe take a moment and have some introspection because you chose to step in to throw metaphorical mud at me here and well it makes you look rather bitter at having lost countless arguments vs me or tried to call me out so many times before and failed. Maybe try some actual arguments in future rather than attempted gotchas
No, I feel rather vindicated and in good spirits watching you act so predictably and be unable to mount an actual response.Yes, yes, you're very persecuted, we know.
Glad to be of service. If you can't make anybody happy, at least I can.No, I feel rather vindicated and in good spirits watching you act so predictably and be unable to mount an actual response.
After I first posted the two sources, you literally said you were referring to the "first account" in your very first response, which was here. Very strange that I took that to mean.... uhrm, the first account that I posted.Funny because I brought up and said the name of the ship before you brought up the name of one.
I literally said the name of the ship did that not tip you off a bit?
Me: They were slaves aboard the Arrogante, it says so right there in the source.I don't think you've ever been proved right in your time posting here [...]
Spoken like a true goal poster. Much appreciated honesty, but you'll never get anything with him. It's all he ever does.After I first posted the two sources, you literally said you were referring to the "first account" in your very first response, which was here. Very strange that I took that to mean.... uhrm, the first account that I posted.
I'm very, very sorry that I didn't realise sooner that you'd failed to even look at the right source. My mistake; I assumed you wouldn't make such an asinine mistake, or at the very least that you would go back and check before accusing others of getting the source wrong.
Me: They were slaves aboard the Arrogante, it says so right there in the source.
You: No it doesn't, they weren't slaves, the source doesn't say that!
Me: *directly quotes source*
You: That's not in the source!
Me: You're looking at the wrong source. Look at the other one, which actually talks about the Arrogante.
You: *further pointless blather and denial*
The actual big argument here again just to refresh your memory as to what the claim was you were trying to argue in support of.After I first posted the two sources, you literally said you were referring to the "first account" in your very first response, which was here. Very strange that I took that to mean.... uhrm, the first account that I posted.
I'm very, very sorry that I didn't realise sooner that you'd failed to even look at the right source. My mistake; I assumed you wouldn't make such an asinine mistake, or at the very least that you would go back and check before accusing others of getting the source wrong.
Me: They were slaves aboard the Arrogante, it says so right there in the source.
You: No it doesn't, they weren't slaves, the source doesn't say that!
Me: *directly quotes source*
You: That's not in the source!
Me: You're looking at the wrong source. Look at the other one, which actually talks about the Arrogante.
You: *further pointless blather and denial*
Fundamentally, I question what the value is of any useful conversation based on the notion that you read someone say something on Twitter / TikTok etc.Spoken like a true goal poster. Much appreciated honesty, but you'll never get anything with him. It's all he ever does.
Yep, there are a lot of fools that like to hear themselves talk, while swallowing shit from other fools that like to hear themselves talk.There's an element of the saying "Who is the greater fool, the fool or the fool who follows him" about it all.
That could be said about the regular Qanon twitter account posts in the Anti-Woke world thread honestly.Fundamentally, I question what the value is of any useful conversation based on the notion that you read someone say something on Twitter / TikTok etc.
The point of social media is that it facilitates people to say anything to everyone, and the people able to voice their opinions includie all the people who are ignorant, stupid and gullible. Thus the ability to find someone in the world who says something iffy is almost infinite. So what on earth is the point of bothering? Unless there's some sort of significant social movement or impact, then it is merely trivial and unserious to make anything of it. There's an element of the saying "Who is the greater fool, the fool or the fool who follows him" about it all.
Either be done with me or actually argue with me pick one of the two rather than sitting throwing bitter invectives from the side lines.Spoken like a true goal poster. Much appreciated honesty, but you'll never get anything with him. It's all he ever does.
Truth sucks doesn't it? And how about you don't talk to me at all? It's the better option and save yourself the humiliation and heart attack.Either be done with me or actually argue with me pick one of the two rather than sitting throwing bitter invectives from the side lines.
It can do.Truth sucks doesn't it?
I happily would leave you alone for the most part to wallow in your self delusions. But you do have such a habit of getting upset and salty on the sidelines and feeling the need to make bold unsubstantiated claims so often.And how about you don't talk to me at all? It's the better option and save yourself the humiliation and heart attack.
Seem more like you wish to ignore what is being said and throw out wild claims unopposed, which would be rather ignorant of you.I have you on ignore, so I don't have to look at your comments. Deal with it.
The USA is a dying empire. That's why a lot of what is continuously being thrown at the US is from the past and their current misbehavior is clearly less intrusive than it was in the past. Obviously there is still plenty to complain about and I wouldn't praise their foreign policy anytime soon.It doesn't need to, but only because it already did that about 150 years ago and successfully claimed the territory it wanted. Plus, if we want to expand from Mexico and Canada, the USA decided to take Hawaii, Philippines, Cuba; there's Guantanamo Bay and hardly a shortage of interventions in places like Nicaragua, Panama, and lower level interference all over Central and Southern America much more recently.
We might also note that the Trump administration challenged Canada's sovereignty over the Northwest Passage, which is incredibly clearly Canadian territorial waters (the USA relies on a dubious interpretation of international law).
I dare say to get some restorative justice for others, some had to be targeted with harsher sentences and more chargesWokest prosecutor in the land can't fight mandatory minimums
If I can't get you to acknowledge the simplest mistake (they were slaves, it said so in the source, and you said over and over that they weren't and it didn't) then there's no use continuing.*SNIP*
I accept I failed to spot the first source you posted which didn't actually embed and I thought was just the link for the second source (Like how it works on discord).If I can't get you to acknowledge the simplest mistake (they were slaves, it said so in the source, and you said over and over that they weren't and it didn't) then there's no use continuing.
Like blood from a stone.I accept I failed to spot the first source you posted which didn't actually embed and I thought was just the link for the second source (Like how it works on discord).
The specific claim I made was (in the exact words): "cannibalism of black people did literally happen". That was here.So will you accept how your source doesn't support the claim you're trying to prove with it?
And yet the thing you were objecting to me posting to laugh at was the claim Black people were killed and eaten by white people as a delicacy...........The specific claim I made was (in the exact words): "cannibalism of black people did literally happen". That was here.
The Black Sailors also apparently died first on the Essex and weren't specifically eaten just cause they were black. Also it doesn't support the idea it was a widespread practice.It was for that claim that you said "Citation needed". And it was for that claim that I provided those two links, one for the Arrogante, and the other for the Essex (where black sailors were eaten first) and Nat Turner.
So yeah, I believe 2 instances of black people being cannibalised supports the claim "cannibalism of black people did literally happen".