. The same guy that claims that there is no sexism in the industry, or claims that it's not that bad.
I never claimed that. In my OP I addressed that these problems are very real in development studios all over the place. God if you are going to talk shit about my POV you could at least read what I actually said instead of projecting your dismissal onto shit I didn't even say.
And the only reason he brought this up is just to stick it to an "sjw", and a person that is an outsider to gaming.
I brought this up to highlight the hypocrisy of the arguments that these type of articles make. Articles that make statements of facts based on no actual knowledge of video gaming or it's history. Much in the same way that the new media harped on games like Mass Effect for daring to have a "sex scene" in them, because I think there is still a portion of the media that thinks video games are still strictly a kids medium. Which makes sense to why the sex characters are always a problem.
But sexy does not equal sexism. You mention Onechambra games and Lillipop chainsaw, both containing characters that are overtly sexualized but done so in an obviously satirical way. Being over the top with it is obviously part of the joke and it doesn't mean that those games are sexist much the same way the Senran Kagura series or Akiba Strip games don't. The lewdness is part of the overall joke concept of the game.
Zero suit Samus got brought up a bunch, and while that outfit is certainly tittlating, Samus (as far as I know) has never been used as a sex object within the games. The zero suit makes sense to be worn under that power armor because what the fuck else is she supposed to wear under that fucking thing, a parka? Much in the same way I bet Master Chef is likely wearing some sort of Under Armour skin tight shirt and pants under his armor. You could, however make the argument, that if Master Chef never takes his armor off then why should Samus ever have too, and that's valid.
It reminds me of what Twitch said and did over the hot tub girls meta, which I think is a perfectly reasonable point, they said that you cannot control what people find attractive, and it's not possible to police what other people might find sexy?
@Casual Shinji said above that they are a sucker for midriffs, which is a fairly mundane thing women wear midriff revealing outfits all the time. Does that mean that characters cannot be dressed in anything that might be form fitting or revealing any sort of skin because someone finds ankles sexy?
I point out the visual appearances of these characters because that is what the article is praising. Aloy isn't super hot and therefore that makes her a good example character, which is ironic because it judges her based of physical appearance not her capabilities and personality which are more the backbone to who she is as a character.
And yes I will bring up threads about this everytime I see an article talking bullshit because i think it's fair to critisize half-assed articles.