Why?They have been for a while
And also moderately hilarious.
Why?They have been for a while
Because they think they're the new punk pretty much lolWhy?
And also moderately hilarious.
So, didn't know about trad skinheads and anti-racist skinheads, huh? Like punks, skins have a Nazi subset they fight againstWhy?
And also moderately hilarious.
Urrrrrrrgh... *considers getting ACAB knuckle tatt lasered off*Because they think they're the new punk pretty much lol
"Bastard occasionally does actual job"So about the police who literally helped pull a pilot to safety from his crashed plane recently, is it also that they're bastards?
Dunno if you know this, but Chauvin was sentenced to 22.5 years for murderfalse allegations against him.
I been a SHARP for 30 years. Try again.So, didn't know about trad skinheads and anti-racist skinheads, huh? Like punks, skins have a Nazi subset they fight against
¯\_(ツ)_/¯I been a SHARP for 30 years. Try again.
And if she named the people she'd be leading an online lynch mob without evidence.Welcome to woke world where you'll make veiled allegations against nebulous people to claim the industry needs fixing and it's having it's Metoo moment but you don't dare actually name the people because that could actually be a risk and would require courage in your conviction and belief your claim and those you've heard hold weight
Nothing, really. I just find it funny that people are apparently using ACAB and Defund the Police interchangably.¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Cops never stopped being bastards, dunno what the problem is
Related, but not interchangeable. ACABs been a thing for yearsNothing, really. I just find it funny that people are apparently using ACAB and Defund the Police interchangably.
Oh I know, BTW my bad when I hit quote it split what I'd written so what you quoted there was meant in relation to Silvanus not you.Dunno if you know this, but Chauvin was sentenced to 22.5 years for murder
She'd at least be sticking to her principals and trying to help people and expose abuse like she claims to now want to help do.And if she named the people she'd be leading an online lynch mob without evidence.
Damned if she does, damned if she doesn't. Course, she could've just walked past the Ubisoft booth
What did they do the rest of the year?So about the police who literally helped pull a pilot to safety from his crashed plane recently, is it also that they're bastards?
So... pro-canceller now are we?Oh I know, BTW my bad when I hit quote it split what I'd written so what you quoted there was meant in relation to Silvanus not you.
She'd at least be sticking to her principals and trying to help people and expose abuse like she claims to now want to help do.
I mean she was more than happy to share allegations against an innocent man before and apparently wasn't troubled by his suicide to unshare them or even point out the mistake and evidence that came to light after. But hey apparently it's fine to go after an indie dev with a history of mental illness and depression but going after wealthy executives, can't do that now can we?
This is the same Anita who still won't share or support the claims against Joss Whedon by the way or even made a statement about how accepting his seeming endorsement of her project may have been a mistake in hindsight......
So, she should have shared, without provable evidence, claims that certain specific people were sex abusers and/or participated in hostile work environments, just like that time she did so that caused an innocent man to kill himself?Oh I know, BTW my bad when I hit quote it split what I'd written so what you quoted there was meant in relation to Silvanus not you.
She'd at least be sticking to her principals and trying to help people and expose abuse like she claims to now want to help do.
I mean she was more than happy to share allegations against an innocent man before and apparently wasn't troubled by his suicide to unshare them or even point out the mistake and evidence that came to light after. But hey apparently it's fine to go after an indie dev with a history of mental illness and depression but going after wealthy executives, can't do that now can we?
This is the same Anita who still won't share or support the claims against Joss Whedon by the way or even made a statement about how accepting his seeming endorsement of her project may have been a mistake in hindsight......
What are you talking about?Shame it turned out it was also Eff supporting their co-worker when some-one who seemingly abused him made false allegations against him.
The version I remember being used when I was in high school was a mite more coarse.Yeah, the late 60s.
Well their jobs of trying to protect the public and dealing with criminals and rather than rage against the people being paid to enforce the rules of the system maybe get mad at the system that put a number of them in place. But hey that would include acknowledging a certain vice presidents role where she helped bring in a number of laws herself that caused some of the stuff you seem to want to rage about.What did they do the rest of the year?