I mean she did with Barclay at one point. Also the people on the Enterprise are meant to the best of humanity who applied for the mission they're literally the best people for the job, and Barclay and O'Brien. (sorry couldn't resist the joke). But yeh they're all meant to be 'perfect' as such because part of the idea is it's not about the character but the dilemmas and the moral issues at play and trying to navigate them. It's rare if ever a character acts out of spite or self interest against the others or some character flaw comes out as part of some issues or the core issue of an episode, well other than Riker being horny but that's only a few episodes.Does Troi do any actual "counsuling" though?
Makes me wonder - if the humans of the 24th century are meant to be perfect, then what do you need a counsellor for?
I know this has been about Discovery, but having seen the first two seasons of TNG, there's a lot I REALLY dislike about the show. Among them how not only are the characters 'perfect,' but know it. FFS, Picard even says as such to Q in the first episode.
1) I mean he wrote the scripts and show concept. Yes he didn't have as big a hand in bringing it to life but it was still a lot of his work. Also being dead he's not borrowing from his work this is Kurtzman and his team borrowing stuff. Funnier still another series Redenberry did have a hand in with Deep Space Nine had more of the DNA of Andromeda reused in it so for Kurtzman and STD to be lifting the last bits from Andromeda just feels almost embarrassingThey are, but I don't hold it against Discovery for the following reasons:
1) Andromeda is the 'child' of Rodenberry, even if he never had a hand in it like Star Trek. It's fairly common for authors to 'borrow' from themselves, so that Star Trek and Andromeda end up exploring similar ideas isn't an issue for me.
2) Even Andromeda aside, Star Trek's considered exploring the decline/collapse of the Federation in works (e.g. the cancelled Final Frontier and Federation series), so that Discovery is the one that runs the ball isn't a mark against it.
3) While Discovery hasn't reached Andromeda at its best, it hasn't matched it at its worst.
2) That's the thing part of the issues around the idea is that's kind of not Star Trek. Star Trek was hopeful Sci-Fi about a better future.
3) Fair but pretty damning for STD really as Andromeda wasn't really on the level of Star Trek
Fair enough thenDon't bother with Major Grin. He's willingly edited scenes to change the context, and to make Discovery look bad.
There's a lot to criticize about Discovery, but at least be honest with it.
I think the feelings things is moreWhen has Star Trek not done that though?
I mean, probably many times, but while I think season 3 does this well at times (e.g. I like how Detmer is crumbling under pressure, and eventually goes to see Cubler), I don't think that's particuarly new. For instance, I finished season 3 of Enterprise last year, and one of the most heartbreaking/memorable moments is when Trip breaks down over grief for his sister and deceased crew-members, and is consoled by T'Pol. That, or when they discuss their deceased 'daughter.' I mean, YMMV as to which show does it 'better,' but I don't think this is new for Star Trek. I don't think it's new for shows in general, sci-fi or otherwise.
Enterprise: Yeh we kind of have to talk about / deal with these feelings because this is a big thing that happened and would rattle anyone
VS
Discovery (from what I've seen): I woke up feeling sad because I had my idea / plan rejected and really need to talk because I miss you and it's all so hard
Enterprise being a case of having to be dragged kicking and screaming to have characters talk about feeling or have it far more Subtle like Malcom Reed and his more subtle stuff about his concerns over his romantic life that sometimes pop up in the show but aren't expressed openly much.