Shhhhh, they might hear! I ate one of the packets on my way home from the shop (I walked the long way round).So did your spouse have 1 cookie or 5? I am very invested in this now.
Shhhhh, they might hear! I ate one of the packets on my way home from the shop (I walked the long way round).So did your spouse have 1 cookie or 5? I am very invested in this now.
Are you trying to sneak a math quiz in here? Get it out!So did your spouse have 1 cookie or 5? I am very invested in this now.
I have never felt so seen in my lifeShhhhh, they might hear! I ate one of the packets on my way home from the shop (I walked the long way round).
Walking slowly back from the shop chanting 'You keep what you kill' and pounding your chest as cookie crumbs spray everywhere.I have never felt so seen in my life
Although that bill is indeed a crock of shit, and aimed at enabling discrimination, the characterisation of what it does there isn't really accurate.*Sigh*
If this passes and you call somebody transphobic because they say their religion says trans people are peadophilic groomers and should be exterminated, you owe them $35,000
OMFG, post the words of the law that say they do what they say. Of course, it doesn't fucking affect me because I don't live in Florida. I'm the one arguing in good faith, you're not. You claimed XYZ, I asked you to back up that claim, and you haven't. I didn't claim anything, what do I have to back up? You're literally making shit up.No, no, no. It has been demonstrated how bad this law is, but you refuse to believe it because you're not the one being negatively effected. The burden is on you to argue in good faith, yet all you've done is make excuses for why you don't have to back up anything that comes out of your mouth.
You make shit up, dude. You really do.
@~1:50I can; I see no reason to, because if I watched every random online video you've found each week, I'd be here for hours of wasted time.
What parts of the curriculum do you believe are violating the constitution?
None particularly, I'm not well acquainted with US talkshows, and don't really want to be either.
Who's said an "entire class" is being devoted to every single one of these people?
You're making wild assumptions about how these things are being taught (whole classes, no context), because you've been presented with a shock-horror-rage list by a right-wing source with an axe to grind.
Complete hysterical bollocks.
Not sure if that works that way, I'm not the expert. I just know sugar without fiber is very bad outside of very small quantities.Sugar doesn't need "its" fibre, if you mean that the sugar and fibre have to come from the same source. So for instance you could eat a load of bran flakes and a glass of apple juice to much the same effect on sugar absorption as you would by eating apples with an equivalent proportion of sugar/fibre.
This is because dietary fibre forms a sort of gel-like mass that holds water and various solutes (like sugars), thereby slowing absorption. It's not like the sugar in an apple can only be slowed by the fibre in the apple because it's... I dunno, chemically bonded to it.
Erm. Can I remind you that you are talking to a biological scientist here, and - FYI - I have taught carbohydrate, lipid and protein metabolism at degree level so I'm not exactly unfamiliar with the area. It's hard to know how to really process that statement. It's so vague it's essentially impossible for me to draw any useful meaning from, but it sounds an awful lot like misguided waffle.
Okay, I increasingly feel that you don't really understand what you're talking about. It's a strangely familiar feeling.
Ah yes. Here we go again: Phoenixmgs thinks he knows better than everyone else because he saw a YouTube vid.
Random hyperbolic statement warning!
You can impotently shriek all you want. The facts don't care about your ego.OMFG, post the words of the law that say they do what they say. Of course, it doesn't fucking affect me because I don't live in Florida. I'm the one arguing in good faith, you're not. You claimed XYZ, I asked you to back up that claim, and you haven't. I didn't claim anything, what do I have to back up? You're literally making shit up.
I just had surgery and am on a liquid diet that includes fruit juices. Maybe you're not as smart as you think you are.How are you gonna say fruit juice is good for anyone? It's objectively bad for anyone to drink. Stop recommending horrible public health policies.
Stop recommending horrible public health policies.
Not saying you're wrong, but that might not have been the response I'd have gone for when Phoenixmgs was criticising other people's recommendations for public health.I just had surgery and am on a liquid diet that includes fruit juices. Maybe you're not as smart as you think you are.
How the body metabolizes the sugar in fruit and milk differs from how it metabolizes the refined sugar added to processed foods. The body breaks down refined sugar rapidly, causing insulin and blood sugar levels to skyrocket.
Because, as stated, fruit juice contains various nutrients and antioxidants that may be beneficial, and when drunk in modest quantities does not pose a significant issue in calorie consumption. Thus context is king, and it depends on what the circumstances of public health are. Stop blabbing absurd and inflexible absolutism.How are you gonna say fruit juice is good for anyone? It's objectively bad for anyone to drink. Stop recommending horrible public health policies.
Really, really, do not start trying to tell me about Alzheimer's, because that is very much in my speciality area. This "type 3 diabetes" was invented and fashionable about 10-15 years, but has gained little traction since. Obesity, diabetes and cardiovascular disease are significant risk factors for Alzheimer's, and thus excessive sugar consumption will be an issue. However, sugar is not the main cause of Alzheimer's.Looks like sugar may be the main cause of Alzheimer's as well since it's now being referred to as type-3 diabetes.
Honestly that's just about the most childish thing anyone's said to me on these forums in a long time.But keep telling people that sugar isn't bad so they keep being unhealthy just so you don't have to agree with me.
So, the line from that section of the video is: "there's a fourteenth amendment question here. One of the scholars cited in the leaks had been quoted as saying 'white people are XYZ', and it was basically just because they were white".@~1:50
It's not a class about one person.So AP African Studies isn't a class? And it's not a class about one people?
Nope. "Nutrition experts" do not generally go around calling things that most people consume daily "poisonous".That flies in the face of nutrition experts.
Sugar on it's own is broken down rapidly. Combined with a fiber or a protein source slows it down.Not sure if that works that way, I'm not the expert. I just know sugar without fiber is very bad outside of very small quantities.
How the body metabolizes the sugar in fruit and milk differs from how it metabolizes the refined sugar added to processed foods. The body breaks down refined sugar rapidly, causing insulin and blood sugar levels to skyrocket.
How are you gonna say fruit juice is good for anyone? It's objectively bad for anyone to drink. Stop recommending horrible public health policies.
Put it in some largish gel caps, much easier to get down.If anyone is worried about their fibre intake, please use psyllium husk, because if enough of you do there won't be any left for me (it's disgusting).
I'm just going to eat a lot of bread until a dietician manages to catch me.Put it in some largish gel caps, much easier to get down.
The more bread you eat, the more easily they can catch you.I'm just going to eat a lot of bread until a dietician manages to catch me.
Generic explanation incoming.Sugar on it's own is broken down rapidly.