So, yet again, just allegations from people who're dead hostile to teachers even talking about these topics, in the midst of lawsuits.
Did you read the first article because even in the interview the parents of the first one were talking about very much not being against the teacher teaching said topics.......
You're literally the only person in this entire discussion to attribute diagnoses and drugs to nonbinary people. You just pulled it out of your ass.
Actually I attributed it to Trans people.
Might want to try bothering to read what I actually say.
Also you can transition using hormones and be non binary so not sure why you think this is some gotcha.
We're not arguing "feelings are reality". Gender is literally already about identity and the sense of self.
We used to call those personalities / personality traits and styles lol.
I don't see how we need depressogender because some-one feels depressed or similar such stuff.
The grand hilarity is just how many of the many genders are defined by the supposed binary they're supposedly outside of. E.G.
"
Gyaragirl/Gyarafeminine: having multiple genders, none of which are understood, that have feminine qualities. This is a type of gendervex or gyaragender. "
or
"Femgender: a nonbinary gender which is feminine in nature"
Why not just say girl? it literally would therefore encompass all that in one without the need to then section off elements now deemed feminine to each be their own gender. I mean what is there female walk gender? Female eyebrow gender? Titsgender?
You're doing exactly the same thing as those utter clowns who argued that if we accept gay people we must therefore accept bestiality. Fallacious, false equivalence bullshit, the flimsiest kind of argument.
Ok lets play out this argument because it's interesting to me.
I don't think we should accept bestiality but lets play it out and could argue for such but I want to see this argument play out.
Why is it you draw the line at people loving their animals?
Sorry, how does this torpedo anything?
Do you believe zoophile people delegitimise gay people? Is that the bullshit you're now going to try to peddle? Sheer, classic homophobia?
No I do believe they're making many of the same arguments and it's funny to see you still refuse to admit we all draw our own lines.
It's difficult to follow what-the-fuck your point is, because you're seemingly incapable of arguing on the merits of the topic itself, instead just constantly making specious comparisons to other shit. Emo is a subculture, which isn't equivalent to depression.
People who actually report depression should be provided with support.
People who call themselves emo, but aren't depressed, aren't asking for support for depression.
And somehow from this, you've concluded that... people should be disbelieved about their own sense of identity? When even your own analogy doesn't show that? As I say, it's difficult to follow, because the points of comparison are so fucking weak and idiotic.
Except I was arguing based on the merits of the topic by using examples of other things to show the error in the present arguments.
EMO is a self identity that people can choose to adopt that is short for "Emotional" and traditionally is meant as a show of being tormented and listening to music many of which is about depression etc. So merely identifying with said identity therefore would mean identifying with depression thus should action not be taken?
My example just showed up the hypocritical nature of acceptance of peoples claims. Because if we are to truly accept people's identity fully it means you must accept EMOs are people with clinical depression. Or you have to accept self identification in such a way doesn't make something true and we don't have to entertain it.
nypost.com
kmph.com
