So.....are we taking bets if this happens who gets outed?
Arwa Mahdawi on it.
School principal forced out if Christian *public* charter school for showing woke classical artwork
normally, a letter is sent out to parents of students warning them that their kiddos are going to see a picture of one of the world’s most famous sculptures. (I believe this is known as a “trigger warning”, something I thought the right were vehemently against.)
Well, they've been trying for the last 10 years or so, I guess there was a chance one was going to stick eventually. I think the previous effort was vetoed by the president, and the one before that was ruled invalid by the Ugandan courts.Uganda banned all forms of gayness apparently, making this video relevant again:
The best part is the sort of gdpr rules that would prevent this is exactly the regulation they would oppose.So.....are we taking bets if this happens who gets outed?
Just write up a list of Republicans who are the most vocal in attacking homosexuals. Odds are at least half of them are just trying to draw attention away from their own "deviant behavior".So.....are we taking bets if this happens who gets outed?
Those who argue that "homosexuality will naturally spread if it isn't strongly repressed" don't even need to be outed.Just write up a list of Republicans who are the most vocal in attacking homosexuals. Odds are at least half of them are just trying to draw attention away from their own "deviant behavior".
The disgusting (-er) part is that this is partially due to lobbying from american "christian" zealots who do tours of Africa devoted to preaching, not the infinite love and forgiveness of Christ, but how evil gay sex is.Well, they've been trying for the last 10 years or so, I guess there was a chance one was going to stick eventually. I think the previous effort was vetoed by the president, and the one before that was ruled invalid by the Ugandan courts.
They seem to have mostly switched to "it really wasn't that big a deal" but I have seen a few of them claim the destruction was caused by agitators.
What the hell is a glowie?Two known Antifa members posed as pro-Trump to infiltrate Capitol riot: sources
At least two known Antifa members were spotted among the throngs of pro-Trump protesters at the Capitol on Wednesday, a law enforcement source told The Post. The Antifa members disguised themselves…nypost.com
Sometimes I wonder if Al-Qaeda/ISIS are glowies and Patriot Front are glowies, are ANTIFA glowies as well?
A government agent infiltrating a movement for the purposes of surveillance or entrapment i.e. basically agent provocateur for the yolo generation.What the hell is a glowie?
The Post has been criticized since the beginning of Murdoch's ownership for sensationalism, blatant advocacy, and conservative bias. In 1980, the Columbia Journalism Review stated that the "New York Post is no longer merely a journalistic problem. It is a social problem—a force for evil."[60]
The Post has been accused of contorting its news coverage to suit Murdoch's business needs, in particular avoiding subjects which could be unflattering to the government of the People's Republic of China, where Murdoch has invested heavily in satellite television.[61]
In a 2019 article in The New Yorker, Ken Auletta wrote that Murdoch "doesn't hesitate to use the Post to belittle his business opponents", and went on to say that Murdoch's support for Edward I. Koch while he was running for mayor of New York "spilled over onto the news pages of the Post, with the paper regularly publishing glowing stories about Koch and sometimes savage accounts of his four primary opponents."[62]
According to The New York Times, Ronald Reagan's campaign team credited Murdoch and the Post for his victory in New York in the 1980 United States presidential election.[63] Reagan later "waived a prohibition against owning a television station and a newspaper in the same market", allowing Murdoch to continue to control the New York Post and The Boston Herald while expanding into television.
In 1997, Post executive editor Steven D. Cuozzo responded to criticism by saying that the Post "broke the elitist media stranglehold on the national agenda."[64]
In a 2004 survey conducted by Pace University, the Post was rated the least-credible major news outlet in New York, and the only news outlet to receive more responses calling it "not credible" than credible (44% not credible to 39% credible).[65]
The Post commonly publishes news reports based entirely on reporting from other sources without independent corroboration. In January 2021, the paper forbade the use of CNN, MSNBC, The Washington Post, and The New York Times as sole sources for such stories.[66]
Not to mention when they said that Antifa was infiltrating the capitol rioters, that's a big red flag there.The new York post is not a credible source.
Maybe they were talking about the FBI that infiltrated antifa? Maybe it was the same spy doing both, and they had seen em be with antifa before being in the riots at the capital, but it was actually fbi all along. It's not the craziest thing to realize, only recently I saw a story about a pink haired pornstar with (according to cop bodycam footage) huuuuge tits, trying to trick antifa into buying illegal guns from the fbi, and that's pretty much confirmed as fact now.Not to mention when they said that Antifa was infiltrating the capitol rioters, that's a big red flag there.
That's a lot more plausible than a lot of whats being bandied about, yeah.Maybe they were talking about the FBI that infiltrated antifa? Maybe it was the same spy doing both, and they had seen em be with antifa before being in the riots at the capital, but it was actually fbi all along. It's not the craziest thing to realize, only recently I saw a story about a pink haired pornstar with (according to cop bodycam footage) huuuuge tits, trying to trick antifa into buying illegal guns from the fbi, and that's pretty much confirmed as fact now.
Basically a slightly unhinged person once said CIA people and other government officials actually glow in the dark.What the hell is a glowie?
It's perfectly plausible that there are people who both attended rallies in support of Antifa and also supported Donald Trump. Let's face it, there are a lot of people out there who are ideologically incoherent and inconsistent, or otherwise have certain strong and eccentric views which may cause radical shifts in apparent allegiance depending on who they perceive best reflects them.Not to mention when they said that Antifa was infiltrating the capitol rioters, that's a big red flag there.