We literally just saw a principle get fired by conservatives for showing David.
Funny events in anti-woke world
- Thread starter Agema
- Start date
If that happened, the Church would move him to a position away from children, and people would accuse the Church of a coverup. Caution is not "we don't have hard proof he's a psycho, so we'll defer to following this anthropologist's advice on untested medical treatment of minors."
To be fair, the David being depicted in that statue is famously a minor in the scene being depicted...
Unclear. David's age is never stated in the Bible at this point, it is just clear he is youthful. He is often portrayed as particularly young in media when shown fighting Goliath to exaggerage the disparity, however, he may plausibly have been anywhere up to around 20 years old.
We're talking about /your/ attitude here.
Other people would accuse the Church of cover-up. And you would tell them they're being absurd, that there's no good evidence, that we can't take sheer speculation as reason to assume guilt.
When have I ever taken that position on anything? Have you never heard me say "proof is a stupid standard"?
Hah, I remember a long conversation in which you insisted that the mountain of circumstantial evidence implicating Giuliani and his cronies was insufficient for us to conclude malfeasance.
I find ironic that assholes like them are banning a Miley Cyrus song, are probably the same ones who made excuses and blaming Black/African/African-American culture. Side rant: Cyrus was guilty of this too and tried to pass the buck. Which is and was bullshit. Cyrus was another celebrity that used the culture for her own gain and abandoned it was no longer convenient, or when it started troubling her reputation. Donating to BLM does not count as an official apology, Cyrus. Actually, admit your bullshit and own up yo iy. I still don't Cyrus and have no respect for her, but is an extra caveat of bullshit.
These morons are the fascists, "snowflakes", and "cancel culture" they accuse everyone else not of their group of being. Fuck them.
Last edited:
On the contrary: the mountain of circumstantial evidence did implicate Giuliani and his cronies, particularly his Ukrainian cronies. We have messages and testimony of those cronies attempting to manipulate Donald Trump, maybe even successfully. The thing that we had no actual evidence for was the idea that they were enacting a plan initiated by Trump to blackmail Ukraine. There's not even circumstantial evidence for that, there's at best plausible interpretation of events to consider that possibility.
You wanna go after Giuliani and Lutsenko based on the evidence available, please do.
Him being the guy's boss is a circumstance and a half. The fact it all solely concerns the big man's direct interests is a circumstance and a half.
Face it: you're not being consistent here. How you approach each of these situations is wholly dependent on the conclusion you want to reach beforehand.
I might point out that a person approaching all situations by the conclusion they want is a form of consistency.
He was, at that very time, Trump's personal lawyer. The fact he was also paid by Lutsenko at the same time is yet another 'circumstance and a half' to add to the growing pile.
Alongside... oh, Trump vocally endorsing Lutsenko in calls with Zelensky. And Trump then publicly embracing the possibility of investigation. And Lutsenko saying that as soon as Giuliani contacted him, he "knew what *they* wanted", and that being dirt on Trump's political opponent.
Dude, it's completely unavoidable to acknowledge that there was a pile of circumstantial evidence. What it lacks is direct and uncircumstantial evidence. But circumstantial? Great big stinking mounds of it. Absolutely dwarfing what there is to incriminate this academic bloke.
To say there's "not even circumstantial evidence" is so beyond laughable, I don't think even you take that seriously.
Yes, pro bono. He was pro bono counsel for Trump for must of their time working together. While getting paid by others to represent their interests.
That is a bold interpretation of that sentence in the call. Why do you think he was referring to Lutsenko?
We have text records of Lutsenko sending his stooge to Giuliani way before that. Lutsenko saying that is trying to cover up his own dealings.
I can see how you think that when you have every detail wrong to support your conclusions.
Resident Evil 4 Remake Is Getting Review Bombed For The Worst Reasons [Update]
Fans argue that Ada Wong actress Lily Gao isn’t sufficiently sultry, and the game itself is somehow too “woke”
kotaku.com
Resident Evil 4 Remake Is Getting Review Bombed For The Worst Reasons [Update]
Fans argue that Ada Wong actress Lily Gao isn’t sufficiently sultry, and the game itself is somehow too “woke”
It's your opinion that if someone works for someone else, but without pay, then that employment is no longer /a circumstance that indicates any kind of concert between the two people/? I wonder if Trump knew that when he was encouraging Zelensky to work with Giuliani to investigate Biden?
Let's keep in mind: you're not merely arguing that there's not a cast iron case. You're arguing there is /no evidence even of a circumstantial nature/.
Directly from the whistle-blower complaint; "The President also praised Ukraine's Prosecutor General, Mr. Yuriy Lutsenko, and suggested that Mr. Zelenskyy might want to keep him in his position".
You can assume that didn't actually take place, of course. It is, after all, *circumstantial*.
Cool, an alternative interpretation of the circumstance.
Literally nothing I said was demonstrably wrong; what's happened is you've provided alternative explanations.
...Seemingly either forgetting what circumstantial actually means, or forgetting the particularly extreme position you took on it.
"I can't jerk off to this! Ruined forever!"Resident Evil 4 Remake Is Getting Review Bombed For The Worst Reasons [Update]
Fans argue that Ada Wong actress Lily Gao isn’t sufficiently sultry, and the game itself is somehow too “woke”
Seriously, she's wearing a skintight sweater dress and high-heeled boots that wouldn't be out of place on a dominatrix. If her voice is such a turn off to them, they can just mute the game whenever she's on screen. I doubt these guys care what a woman has to say anyway.