Maybe ol' Tuck will go to CNN, I hear they have an opening (and a craving for the conservative audience).
Funnily enough...How is Bill O'Reilly doing nowadays? I suspect his post-Fox career could be instructive as to how things could shake out with Tucker Carlsson.
That biatch has no room to talk. He's made money off plenty of people on saying "what they want to hear!". Screw off you biatch in a box stand. Now why don't you go off and sign your master's shoes?
I'm sure I remember reading some attempted legal fudge where Jones is claiming that Infowars has to pay its creditors first, which just so happens to be him and his parents to the sum total of more than its worth, or something.I'd say InfoWars, but due to a one and a half billion judgement against that enterprise, its not viable in the long term.
I mean, these people have no common cause outside hatred of "the other", the definition of which inevitably shrinks down to "anyone who isn't me and mine" (and even the second half of that isn't sacrosanct).A lot of these ultra conservatives and followers of these ultra conservatives love screwing each other over, despite sharing the same or common goals. You know the saying: hell is other people. So they can enjoy all their hell together, and fuck off.
And the award for "Ultimate example of the pot calling the kettle black" goes to... Billow Reilly!
So close, a tiny pot for scalding your testicles, all natural male-contraceptive. And it only hurts a lot for a short time.Miniature tanning beds for your scrotum.
That's one of those names that sounds like a porn star, no matter the context.they were supposed to bring on an awful woman calling herself 'Alison Wonderland'
I think that is popular with roller derby enthusiasts as well.That's one of those names that sounds like a porn star, no matter the context.
I'd also think Alex Jones probably doesn't want someone else stealing his spotlight on his own network/social media platform/whatever the hell infowars is.I'd say InfoWars, but due to a one and a half billion judgement against that enterprise, its not viable in the long term.
Alison Wonderland sounds like a Bart Simpson prank call(or as someone else pointed out, a porn star).Daily wire is likely to be looking to negotiate contracts, they offered a complete idiot like Steven Crowder a $50 million one, which he still turned down publicly, I've no doubt all that Koch/Heritage Foundation etc money can stretch to accommodate someone with a tad more experience at kuntbuggery, and they're in the process of trying to grow their media ecosystem. Doubt infowars are hiring at mo, they were supposed to bring on an awful woman calling herself 'Alison Wonderland' some while back and she has still not appeared, along with the absence of any other newcomers too.
Wouldn't doubt it. CNN continues it's slide into.....wherever the hell it's going.Here's a fun possible outcome, for a given definition of fun.
CNN's conservative shift in trying to find more conservative voices to "balance" their newscast picks up Tucker.
Sure he's got some diehard fans, but I don't think that the average Fox News viewer actually cares what talking head is talking to them so long as they're telling them what they want to hear. Hell, for most people who watch Fox News it's something that they just have on in the background of their lives rather than something that they're actively consuming.I'm guessing a jaunt over to Newsmax and bringing his audience with him. A lot of people who hang on Tucker's words already find Fox as a whole to be too liberal.
The second sentence I agree on far more than the first. That being said, the second sentence is very persuasive.Sure he's got some diehard fans, but I don't think that the average Fox News viewer actually cares what talking head is talking to them so long as they're telling them what they want to hear. Hell, for most people who watch Fox News it's something that they just have on in the background of their lives rather than something that they're actively consuming.
Newsmax also doesn't nearly the amount of money to pay Tucker what he was making at Fox.
I agree. But people like Carlson also have power within the corporation - Carlson can likely dictate a certain amount of his content, and thus Carlson's relatively extreme output likely reflects Carlson. Firing him may be a very visible symbol that Fox needs to tread more care and moderate slightly, and I don't think they'll lose many, if any, viewers by declining to promote white nationalism and gross election lies.Sure he's got some diehard fans, but I don't think that the average Fox News viewer actually cares what talking head is talking to them so long as they're telling them what they want to hear.
Because it wasn't ever about informing the public; it was about spreading lies for profit. And those lies almost led to the death of democracy in this country."Please get her fired. Seriously...What the fuck?" Carlson wrote in a text to his colleagues, according to the filing. "I'm actually shocked...It needs to stop immediately, like tonight. It's measurably hurting the company. The stock price is down. Not a joke."
They still might.And those lies almost led to the death of democracy in this country.
Let's take a bet on what will die first; democracy or lying for profit.They still might.
Can we not? Because I don't think we'll enjoy the outcome of that bet.Let's take a bet on what will die first; democracy or lying for profit.
It's alright, it's not like democracy was ever that living in America anyway.Can we not? Because I don't think we'll enjoy the outcome of that bet.