Funny events in anti-woke world

Schadrach

Elite Member
Legacy
Mar 20, 2010
2,180
426
88
Country
US
Lotta Christian cults are gonna find biblical reasons to reject interracial couples next.
A lot of early Jewish rules in the Bible are about not mixing two different things together, or about not adopting practices of nearby non-Jews. There was literally an undercurrent of racial purity there, and it wouldn't require too hard a look to find it. It's just Jewish supremacy rather than the usual white supremacy.

I got money of some shithead trying to claim that burgers are unique artistic expressions and so can't be sold to the wrong kind of people
Anything you are selling off the shelf shouldn't count but anything custom made to order that involves significant creative input by the person doing the making...

On the edge of my seat to find out the rational as to why the government not collecting on a debt is unconstitutional
I'd put money on it being either not following proper procedure or the power of the purse lying with Congress rather than the President and thus it being something Congress has to pass to be valid.
 

Silvanus

Elite Member
Legacy
Jan 15, 2013
12,153
6,407
118
Country
United Kingdom

TheMysteriousGX

Elite Member
Legacy
Sep 16, 2014
8,482
7,057
118
Country
United States
A lot of early Jewish rules in the Bible are about not mixing two different things together, or about not adopting practices of nearby non-Jews. There was literally an undercurrent of racial purity there, and it wouldn't require too hard a look to find it. It's just Jewish supremacy rather than the usual white supremacy.
It's also not something American Jews tend to engage in so it's moot from that angle, but you can bet the "Judeo-Christian" evangelical cults will gobble it up
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: BrawlMan

XsjadoBlayde

~it ends here~
Apr 29, 2020
3,397
3,529
118

In another era of politics, Republican presidential hopefuls may have hesitated before hitching their brands to an organization whose members have harassed and threatened opponents, fantasized about enacting gun violence, mingled with known extremist groups, quoted Nazi leader Adolf Hitler in their materials, and earned a designation as an anti-government hate group. It’s safe to say that time is long gone.

Five 2024 candidates traveled to the birthplace of the United States to take turns auditioning for the support of a sold-out crowd of Moms for Liberty activists and rhetorically kissing the rings of the group’s co-founders, former school board members Tina Descovich and Tiffany Justice, at their “Joyful Warriors” conference in Philadelphia this week.

It’s little surprise; Moms for Liberty has emerged as a juggernaut in the conservative movement since its inception two years ago. The group claims to fight for “parental rights at all levels of government,” but it’s better known for what it opposes: COVID-19 health precautions, the contents of school libraries, and educational curricula that feature lessons about race, sexuality, and gender. Moms for Liberty has ridden its successes into statehouses across the country, where it hopes to help push anti-LGBTQ bills into law.

The Southern Poverty Law Center added Moms for Liberty to its database of extremist groups last month: a move swiftly rejected by the group as a “political hit job” and frowned upon by many of the group’s conservative media allies. For many speakers, including presidential candidates, that hate group designation was acknowledged via a punchline.


“I’m telling you these people are sick,” former president Donald Trump said, earning laughter from the audience. “Moms for Liberty is no hate group... You’re the best thing that’s ever happened to America.”

Even Nikki Haley, a relative moderate in the current slate of Republican candidates, shrugged off the group’s scandals.

“When they mentioned that this was a terrorist organization, I said ‘Well, then count me as a Mom for Liberty,’” Haley proclaimed to the sold-out crowd. She was met with roaring applause.

Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis told Moms for Liberty that scrutiny of the group was “a sign that we are winning this fight.”

Ryan Walters, the Oklahoma superintendent of public instruction who has called teachers unions “terrorist organizations” and is facing fallout for his handling of federal funds, took his pushback a step further.

“You know who else was called a terrorist group, an extremist group?” Walters rhetorically asked. “Those founding fathers. That’s who you are today. You are the most patriotic, pro-America group in the country right now.”

It’s clear that the SPLC’s hate group designation struck a chord at Moms for Liberty. The joking candor shifted briefly before Trump spoke on Friday, when co-founder Justice teased that her group would be exploring retribution, hinting at possible legal action, against its opponents and critics.

But even with that scrutiny in front of mind, Moms for Liberty made no apparent effort to tamp down on the kinds of extreme rhetoric and far-right affiliations that earned its spot on SPLC’s list to begin with. Even a passing glance at the event’s speakers lineup reveals a wash of far-right ideologues.

One featured speaker was KrisAnne Hall, who has espoused far-right rhetoric and affiliated with less-debatable extremist groups like the anti-government Oath Keepers and neo-Confederate League of the South. Others include James Lindsay, an anti-LGBTQ social media performer who has described the Pride flag as that “of a hostile enemy” and Virginia Lt. Gov. Mark Robinson, an unabashed Christian nationalist who has declared the transgender rights movement is “demonic” and “full of the Antichrist spirit.” Many speakers have publicly accused teachers and officials who promote LGBTQ inclusion in schools of grooming children for sexual exploitation–incendiary rhetoric that has undergirded surges in anti-LGBTQ threats in the US.

That sort of sentiment was mirrored by DeSantis, who maintains a fandom within Moms for Liberty, and the other presidential hopefuls, too. At one point in DeSantis’ speech, he declared that gender-affirming care for transgender youth was “wrong” and “has no place in our society.”

Haley accused transgender rights advocates of “trying to erase” the progress of women in America. Audible groans of disgust could be heard from audience members when Trump bemoaned parents who take their children to drag shows.

The incendiary rhetoric directed toward LGBTQ people and their advocates on stage was certainly hateful, but it also serves to justify a host of behaviors and policies that don’t actually help parents or their children. It also works to cast Republicans’ political opponents not just as people who disagree but as immoral villains who must be defeated by any means necessary, let alone compromised with.

The establishment conservative movement has long sought to undermine public education, and some of its biggest players have predictably rushed to support Moms for Liberty and groups like it. Its founders have discovered allies in a host of conservative movement groups with large bases of support and dollars. Heritage Foundation and Liberty Institute, two of the most powerful and well-funded think tanks in Washington, sponsored Moms for Liberty’s summit this year.

If you believe Trump, all of this debasement is in service of fighting “a cult” of “Marxists and perverts” who are pushing a “poison” of gender ideology on children. Those who believe DeSantis might think of themselves like those who battled for a democratic Berlin after World War II. Whatever it might be, to the true believer, it must be better than the child abuse Democrats supposedly hope to normalize.

The only viable currency in the modern Republican Party is raw power: a fact made self-evident in presidential candidates’ appearances at the Moms for Liberty summit. In their run to the top of the ticket, these Republican candidates have also submitted to a race to the bottom of a barrel, where shame is a benchable injury.


#Brexit
I swear he says this like every year or 2. Same as T.Robinson and co. The door's right there, still open for them any time they want to live up to their word, any day now. 🤞🤞
 

Gergar12

Elite Member
Legacy
Apr 24, 2020
3,981
873
118
Country
United States
Whenever a neoliberal or conservative makes an econ 101 argument...

 

Thaluikhain

Elite Member
Legacy
Jan 16, 2010
19,154
3,894
118
I swear he says this like every year or 2. Same as T.Robinson and co. The door's right there, still open for them any time they want to live up to their word, any day now. 🤞🤞
Yeah, I thought that sounded very familiar. Though, I'm obliged to joke about how they can't get citizenship in the EU anymore.
 
  • Like
Reactions: XsjadoBlayde

Casual Shinji

Should've gone before we left.
Legacy
Jul 18, 2009
20,168
4,932
118






I swear he says this like every year or 2. Same as T.Robinson and co. The door's right there, still open for them any time they want to live up to their word, any day now. 🤞🤞
So can we just refer to them as Moms for Hitler now? Cuz I reckon they'd even like that name change.
 
  • Like
Reactions: XsjadoBlayde

XsjadoBlayde

~it ends here~
Apr 29, 2020
3,397
3,529
118
That looks good in text, but try saying that out loud 3 times fast.
I understand your concern, but hexes can be cast using text-to-speech programs now: drunken casting is no longer a problem - it won't end like last time, pinkie promise! 🤞
 

SilentPony

Previously known as an alleged "Feather-Rustler"
Legacy
Apr 3, 2020
12,059
2,472
118
Corner of No and Where
So shocker of shockers, turns out the gay couple cited in the supreme court case about wedding webdesigners objecting to gay marriage? Yeah turns out he's not gay, he's been married to his wife for 15 years, he never approached the woman behind the lawsuit, never filed anything with the court, has no idea why his name is being used in offcial briefs, and the Christian conservative woman isn't a web designer, and doesn't work for any wedding agency at all and never has. The entire case was made up:

Makes you wonder how this was missed in the discovery phase...
 

XsjadoBlayde

~it ends here~
Apr 29, 2020
3,397
3,529
118
Have never clicked on a RW video on this YouTube profile at all, always used seperate devices and avenues to monitor such content. And am never recommended RW content on it either. Yet, multiple times it is now advertising Matt fckin Walsh's bullshit on account, even in amusingly direct contradiction to the usual recommended vids...

Screenshot_20230703-000147.png
 

Cicada 5

Elite Member
Apr 16, 2015
2,829
1,410
118
Country
Nigeria
So shocker of shockers, turns out the gay couple cited in the supreme court case about wedding webdesigners objecting to gay marriage? Yeah turns out he's not gay, he's been married to his wife for 15 years, he never approached the woman behind the lawsuit, never filed anything with the court, has no idea why his name is being used in offcial briefs, and the Christian conservative woman isn't a web designer, and doesn't work for any wedding agency at all and never has. The entire case was made up:

Makes you wonder how this was missed in the discovery phase...
This decision has to be overturned. There is no way they let a bogus case like this slide.
 

Casual Shinji

Should've gone before we left.
Legacy
Jul 18, 2009
20,168
4,932
118
This decision has to be overturned. There is no way they let a bogus case like this slide.
Unless ofcourse the conservative majority didn't care and couldn't wait in taking its first steps in making discrimination against gays legal again. After Roe v. Wade Clarence Thomas was on a hair trigger already.
 

Avnger

Trash Goblin
Legacy
Apr 1, 2016
2,124
1,251
118
Country
United States
Have never clicked on a RW video on this YouTube profile at all, always used seperate devices and avenues to monitor such content. And am never recommended RW content on it either. Yet, multiple times it is now advertising Matt fckin Walsh's bullshit on account, even in amusingly direct contradiction to the usual recommended vids...

View attachment 9125
Looks like Matt's "documentary" is a paid ad rather than a normal recommendation in this case. They probably setup the ad run to shotgun to any remotely political watching person. Now if you've also been getting some in the normal recommendations, I have no idea.
 

SilentPony

Previously known as an alleged "Feather-Rustler"
Legacy
Apr 3, 2020
12,059
2,472
118
Corner of No and Where
Unless ofcourse the conservative majority didn't care and couldn't wait in taking its first steps in making discrimination against gays legal again. After Roe v. Wade Clarence Thomas was on a hair trigger already.
If I had the money I'd be asking an apelet court to strike the ruling down. Fuck 'em. Have it declared unconstitutional on grounds of perjured testimony. Say the Supreme Court did not conduct due diligence, so you must declare their ruling unconstitutional. See what happens.
 

XsjadoBlayde

~it ends here~
Apr 29, 2020
3,397
3,529
118
Looks like Matt's "documentary" is a paid ad rather than a normal recommendation in this case. They probably setup the ad run to shotgun to any remotely political watching person. Now if you've also been getting some in the normal recommendations, I have no idea.
Yeah, noticed the ad label, is just ads rarely appear there if at all thanks to, um, a helpful browser. And am very interested in the workings and tinkering of algorithms when it comes to political influence. Anyhow, the news recommends on the same page are even less justifiable! 2 notoriously toxic UK RW rags i actively keep behind protective glass when observing. 😉

Screenshot_20230703-145232.png
 

Absent

And twice is the only way to live.
Jan 25, 2023
1,594
1,557
118
Country
Switzerland
Gender
The boring one
a [gofundme] collection for the family of the French police officer under investigation for shooting dead a 17-year-old (...) has topped more than €1m (£860,000) in donations. A similar collection to help the family of the victim, Nahel Merzouk, killed a week ago in Nanterre outside Paris after being stopped by two motorcycle patrol officers, has collected less than €200,000.
“More than a million euros collected on the initiative of a far-right polemicist in support of a police officer who kills a teenager. The message? It pays to kill a young Arab”