In my fantasies, she's ALWAYS wearing a black tank top... and slightly sweaty.Was she wearing a black tank top, though?
In my fantasies, she's ALWAYS wearing a black tank top... and slightly sweaty.Was she wearing a black tank top, though?
Don't watch the fourth Resident Evil film then, to mess with the expectations of the audience that's not always the case there. Weird.In my fantasies, she's ALWAYS wearing a black tank top... and slightly sweaty.
Ah, a man of my own heart.Like, I'd be shocked if I met her, and she didn't put me in a headlock or armbar within the first 30 seconds (I've also fantasized about those exact things. Don't judge me.)
Better yet, don't watch any of the live action W.S Anderson RE films.Don't watch the fourth Resident Evil film then, to mess with the expectations of the audience that's not always the case there. Weird.
Pretty much, I think. Mario had a built-in fanbase, whereas Elemental...did not.So recently Pixar's Elemental was dubbed as The Good Dinosaur 2.0, the current example of how the studio lost its way, yet when I caught a glimpse of the audience score on this thing it seems to be doing quite well. Very well as a matter of fact. And I'm wondering why this movie isn't garnering the same level of defense from the usual channels as the Super Mario Bros. Movie did, where its audience score was used as proof of its quality and how the critics are out of touch. Now obviously Elemental was a box office dud and Mario a massive hit, but that wasn't the criticism leveled toward it - it was how Pixar lost its touch and how they're failing to capture the audience.
I haven't seen Elemental nor do I have much interest in seeing it (same for the Mario movie), but I do wonder, were review/animation channels too eager to jump on the chance of calling out Pixar's failure?
The chase scene is like the ones you have in Rick and Morty. An unpredictable character who knows they are getting away with everything without a scratch rampages through places that supposedly have a function and actually matter to other unimportant people over there, but y'know it was all in the way.Nimona 2023
It's an old action trope that just went in crescendo since starsky and hutch were driving through cardboard boxes.The chase scene is like the ones you have in Rick and Morty. An unpredictable character who knows they are getting away with everything without a scratch rampages through places that supposedly have a function and actually matter to other unimportant people over there, but y'know it was all in the way.
If The Good Dinosaur - which I agree is crap - and Elemental - which I have not seen yet - are indeed Pixar's biggest failures, then that's two duds out of twenty seven. And that's a pretty fuckin' good hit rate by any measure as far as I'm concerned.So recently Pixar's Elemental was dubbed as The Good Dinosaur 2.0, the current example of how the studio lost its way, yet when I caught a glimpse of the audience score on this thing it seems to be doing quite well. Very well as a matter of fact. And I'm wondering why this movie isn't garnering the same level of defense from the usual channels as the Super Mario Bros. Movie did, where its audience score was used as proof of its quality and how the critics are out of touch. Now obviously Elemental was a box office dud and Mario a massive hit, but that wasn't the criticism leveled toward it - it was how Pixar lost its touch and how they're failing to capture the audience.
I haven't seen Elemental nor do I have much interest in seeing it (same for the Mario movie), but I do wonder, were review/animation channels too eager to jump on the chance of calling out Pixar's failure?
I do wonder, were review/animation channels too eager to jump on the chance of calling out Pixar's failure?
Pretty much, I think. Mario had a built-in fanbase, whereas Elemental...did not.
I've said it before, and I will say it again: Most of these channels couldn't review nor analyze their own assholes properly! A majority of them are glorified gossipers, grifters, click-baiters, or know-nothing-assholes with nothing better to do with their lives, by pretending to be smart and think they're "beating the system". I learned to ignore them early on back in the early 2010s for a good reason.If The Good Dinosaur - which I agree is crap - and Elemental - which I have not seen yet - are indeed Pixar's biggest failures, then that's two duds out of twenty seven. And that's a pretty fuckin' good hit rate by any measure as far as I'm concerned.
Can't say I've enjoyed a Wes Anderson movie for a while now. As he progressed as a director his movies lost their humanity in pursuit of his diorama-esque style. Rushmore and The Royal Tenenbaums are still great, but starting with The Life Aquatic the cold mechanism of his filmmaking already starts to overtake the warmth and humanity of the acting performances.Just watched Asteroid City, my first Wes Anderson movie. My overall impression of it is: well made movie, did exactly what it was trying to do, just wasn't my type of movie. I could appreciate what it was doing, but I can't say I really enjoyed it.
Depends on what we consider a failure. Commercially yes. Other more recent Pixar films, but by no means all of them, have done incredibly well in that regard. Incredibles 2, Finding Dory and Toy Story 4 are all in the top 10 highest grossing animated films of all time. But if we're talking in terms of the standard of quality Pixar established in the 2000s, the overwhelming impression to me is that they've been struggling to hit the high notes of Wall-E, Up or Finding Nemo for over a decade. Right after Toy Story 3 there were Cars 2, Brave, and Monsters University, all of which got a resoundingly mediocre response. Inside Out was widely lauded, but what came after? The Good Dinosaur, Finding Dory, and Cars 3, none of which were considered masterpieces. After that there's plenty of duds:If The Good Dinosaur - which I agree is crap - and Elemental - which I have not seen yet - are indeed Pixar's biggest failures, then that's two duds out of twenty seven. And that's a pretty fuckin' good hit rate by any measure as far as I'm concerned.
Okay, fine. Pixar are dead in the water now.Depends on what we consider a failure. Commercially yes. Other more recent Pixar films, but by no means all of them, have done incredibly well in that regard. Incredibles 2, Finding Dory and Toy Story 4 are all in the top 10 highest grossing animated films of all time. But if we're talking in terms of the standard of quality Pixar established in the 2000s, the overwhelming impression to me is that they've been struggling to hit the high notes of Wall-E, Up or Finding Nemo for over a decade. Right after Toy Story 3 there were Cars 2, Brave, and Monsters University, all of which got a resoundingly mediocre response. Inside Out was widely lauded, but what came after? The Good Dinosaur, Finding Dory, and Cars 3, none of which were considered masterpieces. After that there's plenty of duds:
- Onward, which no one remembers even being a Pixar movie and didn't even make its budget back
- Soul, which was well received, but released straight to streaming
- Lightyear was a full on flop, barely making back its $200 million budget
- Luca only grossed 49 million, which is shockingly low for a Pixar film (though again, released on streaming)
- Elemental, obviously, but IMO it's a bit too early to tell for that one
Who’s holding a gun to your head to watch them?Man, I keep forgetting all these pixar movies exist. I wish Disney would take a step back ask "why" each of these movies is being made. It used to be that Pixar movies were a special event and each had something to say, but I can't recall the last one that had that special punch. I think Lightyear really turned me off on Pixar. Watching their movies just feels like a chore now.
Disney would take a step back ask "why" each of these movies is being mad