Very future. Also, not sure why Dyson sphere are inherently a woke thing.
All I see is future military targets.
I guess that wasn't the greatest word to use, Clinton has a lot more annoying smugness that people with like doctorates have sometimes, the kind of people that correct you if you use Mr. instead of Dr.Are you serious?
Trump is THE definition of smug
Again, this is not a defense of Clinton. She's been pretty smug.
But Trump get treated very different from everyone else on the planet.
I cannot fathom why anyone would even think of this sentence, it's so outside reality
No, she didn't. Her own campaign team fabricated the Trump-Russia collusion and then she said Trump wasn't a legitimate president. If you all would only chatise your own team for the very thing the other side does (after your own team did it), then I would hardly even have to post. You all were all so mad at Trump when Hillary and the democrats did the same thing the very previous election.At least Clinton accepted defeat.
Clinton did accept defeat, but criticised the methods Trump used to win. That's not remotely the same.No, she didn't. Her own campaign team fabricated the Trump-Russia collusion and then she said Trump wasn't a legitimate president.
The woke thing is the Geneva conventions forcing you to not do X y or z in a war.Very future. Also, not sure why Dyson sphere are inherently a woke thing.
Um, bit of a stretch, but ok.The woke thing is the Geneva conventions forcing you to not do X y or z in a war.
Also the un convention on space ownership.
Explain the distinction.Clinton did accept defeat, but criticised the methods Trump used to win. That's not remotely the same.
What Trump did to win wasn't against the rules, it doesn't invalidate the results of the election. Neither does losing the popular vote. Complaining that your opponent did something immoral to win is hardly new. In the same way that Obama winning by identity politics or whatever is naughty, but acceptable, while if he'd been lying about his birth certificate that would have been illegal. Some claimed the first but didn't go so far to claim the second.Explain the distinction.
Trump just won plain and simply (he didn't do anything underhanded), and Clinton said he was an illegitimate president. Then the democrats went after him the majority of his term for not being a "legitimate" president, seems like the dems are the sorer loser vs Trump and that's saying something because Trump is like a 2-year old.What Trump did to win wasn't against the rules, it doesn't invalidate the results of the election. Neither does losing the popular vote. Complaining that your opponent did something immoral to win is hardly new. In the same way that Obama winning by identity politics or whatever is naughty, but acceptable, while if he'd been lying about his birth certificate that would have been illegal. Some claimed the first but didn't go so far to claim the second.
Just read the words. They explain themselvesExplain the distinction.
Clinton went on because she won the popular vote. It's just not related to actually winning power because the US has made it so voting doesn't actually matter. Voting not mattering is written into the US constitution and is taken out by most countries because it's that stupidTrump just won plain and simply (he didn't do anything underhanded), and Clinton said he was an illegitimate president. Then the democrats went after him the majority of his term for not being a "legitimate" president, seems like the dems are the sorer loser vs Trump and that's saying something because Trump is like a 2-year old.
Voting does matter, America could easily vote both these parties out but they don't because everyone is convinced that if they don't vote for their side the worst could happen like "democracy will end" or some bullshit.Clinton went on because she won the popular vote. It's just not related to actually winning power because the US has made it so voting doesn't actually matter. Voting not mattering is written into the US constitution and is taken out by most countries because it's that stupid
Edit: Ah, this is not a defense of Hillary as she claims some wild nonsense over the years. It's just when Hillary is criticized, there isn't a huge army defending her. Also, she forever has my disdain over what she did to Lefties in generally
Well, that's a complete and total lie.No, she didn't. Her own campaign team fabricated the Trump-Russia collusion and then she said Trump wasn't a legitimate president. If you all would only chatise your own team for the very thing the other side does (after your own team did it), then I would hardly even have to post. You all were all so mad at Trump when Hillary and the democrats did the same thing the very previous election.
That is literally what happened. Also the democrats kept trying to get Trump booted out of office. I thought they are the party of democracy?Well, that's a complete and total lie.
Well, that's a complete and total lie.
And then got fined $113k because they spent that money on electioneering and reported it as "legal services" to hide what they were doing.That is literally what happened.
Another lie, no where in that article does it say the Clinton campaign fabricated the story.That is literally what happened. Also the democrats kept trying to get Trump booted out of office. I thought they are the party of democracy?
Paying other people to fabricate the story is a distinction without a difference.Another lie, no where in that article does it say the Clinton campaign fabricated the story.
What your saying now is an instance of russian collusion. You colluding with Phoenixmgs.Paying other people to fabricate the story is a distinction without a difference.
Well now you're just saying silly things for fun.What your saying now is an instance of russian collusion. You colluding with Phoenixmgs.