The problem is, it kind of depends on the situation. Again, I don't have a really good read on gymnastics so I'm really not on either side of the Chiles situation. The football scenario, there are rules that govern situations like that in major league sports. Like playing a game officially under protest. And depending on the situation, they generally go with the call on the field or the way the game ended... but sometimes a win can be vacated. And there can't be a statute of limitations. Do you want Lance Armstrong to get all those Tour de France wins back? Now, that's an extreme example. But it is an example that illustrates why something like that is situational and case-by-case.I don't disagree; watching all of the judged events, it's hard not to squirm when you see scores you subjectively feel weren't deserved, for better OR worse. But you trust that the judges know what they're looking at/for, that they are impartial, and the athletes have agreed to abide by that judgement, i.e.: they know what they should and should not do for an optimal score. Again, it's a case of not liking a thing for being the thing; the scoring is a part of the whole; that IS the sport.
But as to this instance not bothering you, that's fine, but let me ask you: if there's a statute of limitations on when a challenge can be issued during an event, does it not follow that there should be a similar statute on when a decision can be reversed after an event? Not even just the event, the whole OLYMPICS were over! By this logic, think how many sporting events could be retroactively "adjusted" if we're to be okay in this case. Do we want refs looking at tape days after a football game and deciding that a holding penalty they missed that gave an offense a fresh set of downs to score a game-winning touchdown affected the more likely outcome of the game, and giving the losing team the win posthumously? Hell, that's not even a fitting analogy in this case as at least that's based on performance; same scenario, but upon review of the tape, they see the coach's foot was on the playing field during play, so they negate the play and strip the win? Make sense?
There's no question that she should have been allowed to continue. That is just what the rules say. It is just... more difficult for me to say something like "she was robbed" when my own eyes tell me who fired better shots that round. To me it isn't like a situation where the wrong person won because of a missed call. It is just harder for me to care that much when the person who I think clearly deserved to win and observably did perform better, did. Even if it was the result of a bad call. As for the football analogy...See, this bother's me too, but for the opposite reason. Sounds like Rutter PERFORMED within the regulations, and was indeed robbed. Unless there's a rule, subjective judgement, or objectively qualifiable score surrounding how much debris is left in remains to constitute a "hit," she did what she needed to do to continue the shootout, and was disallowed. That's not fair. Should field goals be scored differently depending on how "down the middle" they fly? Are we discounting those that bounce in off the uprights?
There was a point in time when it didn't matter how far away from the basket you were in baskeball. A bucket was 2 points, no matter how far away you were. You wanna change football to make a FG worth 5 if it went between 2 smaller poles about 2 ft apart in the center of the uprights? I wouldn't either, but such a change to the rules wouldn't be "the end of football." It would just be something people would gripe about for a couple of weeks or so. And then accuracy would matter. Besides, trap shooting is more like a kicking contest where two kickers go head to head moving back 5 yards with each kick until one misses. And in such a contest; if both guys miss at 70 and one kicker's 65er went down the middle and would have been good from 75, while the other double doinked his through and it would have missed if it were an inch longer? Ok, maybe both get a shot from 68 for the win... but I know who the better kicker is.