Trump ordered to pay $350 million for fraudulent business practices in New York
- Thread starter Piscian
- Start date
Trump says what he actually thinks about his supporters, then tries to play it off as a joke.
www.independent.co.uk
He also claimed to have twenty thousand supporters appear at a venue that can hold three thousand people, and joked about the heat in temperatures that sent six of his supporters to the hospital.
Trump apologists storming in to say that "the left is just overreacting" in three, two, one....
Trump tells rally-goers not to die in Vegas heat: ‘I don’t care about you’
Remark get laughs at rally – but also draws raised eyebrows on social media as critics argue Trump was being truthful
www.independent.co.uk
He also claimed to have twenty thousand supporters appear at a venue that can hold three thousand people, and joked about the heat in temperatures that sent six of his supporters to the hospital.
Trump apologists storming in to say that "the left is just overreacting" in three, two, one....
I love the bit in the first video where he's protesting about the story where he called dead servicemen "suckers" and "losers", and argues that only a psycho would say that.
Well, if the shoe fits...
(Admittedly, he's a colossal narcissist rather than a psycho, but in many ways that would apply here, there's not much difference between the two.)
Narcissism is considered a personality disorder (Cluster B) and a psychosocial disability, so by psychiatric definition Trump is both a narcissist and a psycho.
Last edited:
He'll tell you he didn't say things he's been recorded saying. And his supporters will believe him over their own eyes and ears.
Convicted felon Donald Trump criticizes Biden's mental capacity, then in the very next sentence gets the name of his former White House doctor wrong.
www.newsweek.com
Even Adam Sandler wouldn't write comedy this banal.
Trump Confuses Doctor's Name While Challenging Biden to Cognitive Test
Critics of former President Donald Trump quickly seized on the gaffe regarding the name of his former White House doctor.
www.newsweek.com
Even Adam Sandler wouldn't write comedy this banal.
So, bit of a resurrection for this thread.
Apparently, Trump has announced his intention to sue the DoJ for... I dunno, harassment, illegal law enforcement, whatever... demanding $100 million in damages. From what I've read, this has approximately zero legal merit. The DoJ then has 180 days to respond, and then the case may move to court.
However, the question is why: a) because he loves lawsuits even when they are hopeless; b) it's campaign PR and will be quietly dropped later, c)...
Start the case, and let it go through procedure. If he wins the election and becomes President, however, he has total control over the executive and immunity from prosecution. So he can potentially just order the DoJ to concede, settle, and hand $100 million over to him!
Apparently, Trump has announced his intention to sue the DoJ for... I dunno, harassment, illegal law enforcement, whatever... demanding $100 million in damages. From what I've read, this has approximately zero legal merit. The DoJ then has 180 days to respond, and then the case may move to court.
However, the question is why: a) because he loves lawsuits even when they are hopeless; b) it's campaign PR and will be quietly dropped later, c)...
Start the case, and let it go through procedure. If he wins the election and becomes President, however, he has total control over the executive and immunity from prosecution. So he can potentially just order the DoJ to concede, settle, and hand $100 million over to him!
Yeah, I was thinking C as soon as I started reading this. Though A and B aren't unlikely either.
You see that's the beauty of it - it's B if he loses, C if he wins.
I've watched long clips from a few of his recent rallys. I think he's starting to fade. He used to be able to put together fairly coherent speeches that stay on a sort of theme. Lately though it's like he struggles to remember what he's talking about very quickly and he'll do stuff like that and then say he's kidding. Not because he messed up but as a way to try and get himself back on track. Hit his inner reset button as it were.Trump says what he actually thinks about his supporters, then tries to play it off as a joke.
Trump tells rally-goers not to die in Vegas heat: ‘I don’t care about you’
Remark get laughs at rally – but also draws raised eyebrows on social media as critics argue Trump was being truthful
He also claimed to have twenty thousand supporters appear at a venue that can hold three thousand people, and joked about the heat in temperatures that sent six of his supporters to the hospital.
Trump apologists storming in to say that "the left is just overreacting" in three, two, one....
His supporters are down to "eeh theres a general message in there somewhere of America First".
Biden really did him an amazing solid when he started freezing up like Mitch McConnell. If it weren't for that Trump would look much worse. Which he's really starting to now that Kamalas come in. I've been watching a lot of pollster reviewing interviews with undecided voters who voted for Trump in 2016 and the general consensus even among those still planning to vote for Trump was that Kamala just seems more cognizant.
You may ask why still vote for Trump? The interviewees still had that weird worldview that "a business man running the government is better than a career politician". It's sad that they think that, but its difficult to defend how much of our budget goes to things not directly related to infrastructure and social welfare for existing Americans.
Then they're dumb ass bitches that sealed their own fate and too dumb, selectively oblivious, or all the above to know it. They have no one to blame, but themselves, yet won't own up to it. Good luck with your "paradise", you heathens.
I agree, he's further from his peak than he was 8 years ago, no doubt about that. But the question isn't Trump vs Trump 8 years ago, it's Trump vs Harris. Is he worse at making coherent statements than Harris?
Have you listened to statements by either of them? I don't blame you if you haven't, it's reasonable to accept that your opinion isn't changing anyway.
I have. Biden wasn't, but Harris is many orders of magnitude more coherent. He can barely string a sentence. He recently told a news show it should bring back a presenter 20 years dead.
Also: "She had the other interview with the other guy who was a nice guy I think from Philadelphia from Pennsylvania, he was a nice guy, he was asking her all these — the daily take — they don’t take like I do! Anybody wants to go, go what the hell differences they make — they have — and how dishonest was ABC..."
Last edited:
Yes. Without any qualifiers. Did you see the debate? It was bad enough that not only was Trump rambling semi-coherently, he was never rambling semi-coherently about the question being asked.
I hate Harris and yes, the debate went perfectly for her because compared to Trump she sounds like she doesn't have dementia and that she doesn't come across as a giant whiny baby.
Can you point out to me where Harris did something like reply to a question about US manufacturing by rambling about World War III?