Funny events in anti-woke world

Silvanus

Elite Member
Legacy
Jan 15, 2013
12,100
6,379
118
Country
United Kingdom
I mean, personally I do think that's the more important consideration.
It can be a more important consideration societally while also not being the primary purpose of this mechanism.

Sure, the primary goal of taxation is to fund the government, but understanding that is easy and simple. More intricate and thus deserving vastly more care and planning is how to extract those funds in a way that incentivizes good behavior and mitigates market failures. People are going to try to minimize their tax burden in any system, so the systems are put together with the intention that good practices lead to lower tax burden, because otherwise the rich will lean more heavily into bad practices to avoid taxes. So what is the effect of taxing people on unrealized capital gains on stocks, how does one avoid that tax? The government is going to come after the ultra-rich for their stock holdings, they'll certainly have to sell off assets for cash in order to pay the tax bill, so they're going to avoid that as best they can. How does one avoid that? They could avoid ownership entirely, find a way to entrench their power and revenue streams without actually having their name down on paper as owners, which is bad as now we've distanced the people in charge from legal culpability for their actions. Or they could avoid unrealized gains by making their stocks not worth owning, by siphoning the value out of companies in an indirect way that would not benefit other stockholders. That's not great, that just prevents anyone new from gaining wealth. The potential consequences aren't great here.
This boils down to, "it will encourage people to abuse the system to avoid it". An argument that is levied against any tax on the ultra wealthy: capital gains, wealth, property, etc. The solution is not to shy away from making the ultra-wealthy pay their fair share. The solution is to close loopholes and exploitable mechanisms.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Cicada 5

tstorm823

Elite Member
Legacy
Aug 4, 2011
7,178
969
118
Country
USA
This boils down to, "it will encourage people to abuse the system to avoid it". An argument that is levied against any tax on the ultra wealthy: capital gains, wealth, property, etc. The solution is not to shy away from making the ultra-wealthy pay their fair share. The solution is to close loopholes and exploitable mechanisms.
You can only close every legal loophole, you can only eliminate legal exploits. If you end up in a system where wealth is de facto outlawed, you encourage outlaws, and now the economy is run by the mafia instead. Good job. Every argument you would likely make about the inefficacy of prohibition for things like drugs and alcohol applies doubly to money. The wiser play is to make the system disproportionately benefit those who play by the rules, but then those benefits are most of what people characterize as loopholes and exploits, so here we are.