Gun accidents only happen to stupid people, I'm too smart for bad things to happen to me.Would've thought gun safety's second nature for a family priding themselves around the celebrity career they have, but nope it seems even that don't protect against shooting your own kid during a whatever the fuckery atoo occurred
It's unreasonable to expect an adult to check a gun isn't loaded before they point it at anyone else for funsies? I didn't think that was unreasonable but I could be wrongGun accidents only happen to stupid people, I'm too smart for bad things to happen to me.
You're talking about unreasonable people.It's unreasonable to expect an adult to check a gun isn't loaded before they point it at anyone else for funsies? I didn't think that was unreasonable but I could be wrong
Last last I checked, one of the tenets of responsible firearm use was you did not point the gun at anyone or anything you did not fully intend to shoot. Not for a joke, not for staging, not for anything. Even if they had checked it and unloaded the rounds, they’re still not using it in a manner that would be considered safe and responsible.It's unreasonable to expect an adult to check a gun isn't loaded before they point it at anyone else for funsies? I didn't think that was unreasonable but I could be wrong
Rogan really has no place to talk. Considering all the crap he pulled off. The lies and half truths he was more than happy to spread for his former master.National Propaganda Racket -
Being able to cover it up afterwards would be a surprise, though.Never heard of this theory before, but wouldn’t be all that much more surprising than the shit going on today -
Probably not much different to how *they’ve* been able to suppress the Epstein files, in a time when optics are far much more difficult to control. Just deny it all and then when that fails rely on the ol’ standard of threatening/humiliating/killing/etc. anyone who suggests anything other than the official story I guess. Basically an offshoot of religion to keep people in line, for more extenuating circumstances.Being able to cover it up afterwards would be a surprise, though.
I disagree there, AFAIK, there weren't widespread people challenging the official line in that way that needed to be suppressed. If it gets to that point, the secret is already out in the open, it's just not been confirmed yet. I don't think that was the case with the Titanic at all.Probably not much different to how *they’ve* been able to suppress the Epstein files, in a time when optics are far much more difficult to control. Just deny it all and then when that fails rely on the ol’ standard of threatening/humiliating/killing/etc. anyone who suggests anything other than the official story I guess. Basically an offshoot of religion to keep people in line, for more extenuating circumstances.
I misspoke, not to mean it literally was challenged like that, but rather had it been that similar tactics would’ve been used to quell it.I disagree there, AFAIK, there weren't widespread people challenging the official line in that way that needed to be suppressed. If it gets to that point, the secret is already out in the open, it's just not been confirmed yet. I don't think that was the case with the Titanic at all.
Ah, in that case yes, though how successful it'd be I'm not sure. Wouldn't be 100%, but then for most purposes you don't need anything like that amount.I misspoke, not to mean it literally was challenged like that, but rather had it been that similar tactics would’ve been used to quell it.