I've agreed that the evidence you've laid out is persuasive and justifies scrutiny. Why would I say "agree to disagree" when I agreed with you like 8 times?
Funny events in anti-woke world
- Thread starter Agema
- Start date
Recommended Videos
Sen. Mitch McConnell hospitalized, spokesman says
Sen. Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., was admitted to the hospital for an undisclosed reason on Sunday morning, a spokesman for his office announced.
They can stay unhappy, it's them who sold the IAI Lavi, and send them to China with dual use military technology, and know-how on how to make a fighter jet.
With Russia trolling the US by wanting the US and Russia to decrease US and Russian nuclear arsenals while China will build more nuclear weapons, we should not sign another treaty on nuclear weapons and anti-missile defense treaties no matter what dipshit realist academics say.
It was the Russians, China, and Pakistan that gave dual use nuclear technology, nuclear power plant construction, nuclear weapons technology know-how, and ICBM rocket engine technology and handed them out like candy to North Korea, Libya, Iraq, and now Iran. Which is a very self-destructive thing even to themselves as all of those countries do face terrorist attacks.
US missile defense is the US advantage here, and we should advance this technology as much as we can alongside the EU, and share this with Japan and South Korea. Anything else is asking for a nuclear terrorist attack on a major Ally, US or EU city no matter what quisling far left and far right idiot says and no matter how we appease these continentalist trolls.
Last edited:
The issue is overcome with a new technology that didn't exist until the last couple years. Everything Kathryn Porter said in the video I linked (that is close to a year old) is true and what actual engineers have said. Yet you smeared her and said she didn't know anything.
Why would you pour tons of resources/money into a type of energy that wasn't compatible with current grids 5 years ago,10 years ago, etc. when nuclear power has existed for 50+ years and is perfectly compatible with our system and also extremely green?
You provided basically 0 evidence...
I've seen what has happened throughout my life with these so-called "scientific consensuses". I've seen scientists say to eat the exact opposite foods you should be eating for 50 years (Harvard still says stuff that is just massively wrong). My mom's doctor told her not to eat eggs. I saw what happened with covid, scientists were shadow banned on social media, tons of doctors self-censoring. I see how basically every chronic disease is treated, by treating the symptoms instead of the actual cause.
This is literally from 2 months ago...
Is low-fat or full-fat the better choice for dairy products? - Harvard Health
The debate in the dairy case may come down to limiting overall fat intake. Image: © Lise Gagne/Getty Images In the 1980s, fat came under fire, and low-fat or fat-free products be...
www.health.harvard.edu
Censorship and Suppression of Covid-19 Heterodoxy: Tactics and Counter-Tactics - PMC
The emergence of COVID-19 has led to numerous controversies over COVID-related knowledge and policy. To counter the perceived threat from doctors and scientists who challenge the official position of governmental and intergovernmental health ...
pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
"Greenhouse gases warm the climate, but it’s not the apocalypse." - Roger Pielke. Literally what I said, it's not the end of the world...
We need an age cap on either voting or holding office. If you are above age 70ish, I don't want you in charge or holding the government hostage. I would honestly prefer if Bernie Sanders, and liberal old people lose their rights over democracy and getting taken apart piece by piece.
https://bsky.app/profile/did:plc:4llrhdclvdlmmynkwsmg5tdc/post/3mocbrnwkgk26?ref_src=embed
Even at an event celebrating Trump, these guys still can't help bringing up the Obamas.
Ok, so the issue is overcome now, great. And even beforehand, it can't have been an unavoidable block to renewable energy integration, because dozens of countries successfully integrated anyway.
Everything i said about Kathryn Porter was correct. She has zero relevant experience or qualification in the field. That is not a smear. That is the truth.
Of what? What would you like evidence of? I've provided you sources on the enormous subsidies going to fossil fuels. The fact that renewables can be successfully, widely integrated is proven by the fact that they already have been.
Lol, no. You have proven time and again that you don't have the willingness, patience, or understanding to engage with scientific literature. You cherry pick, you ignore or misread what doesn't suit you, you dismiss what you disagree with on spurious grounds. You have zero grasp of remotely scientific topics and have shown absolutely no drive to learn.
Yeah.... this is the problem with Baby Boomers and lower birthrates. They have way more control as they are such a massive voting block that it punishes every other generation
Sounds good.
If you look at the list of countries that use quite a large chunk of renewables coupled with the main renewables being wind and solar, they are paying high energy costs. The vast vast vast majority of countries that have significant percentage of renewables in their grid use hydro as by far the main source of renewable energy.
Someone that says the same things chief engineers say =/= unknowledgeable.
I never claimed anything about fossil fuels not getting subsidies, I said renewables now get more subsidies in the US.
Funny when I apply stuff I learn to my life how often it works out. I go by who makes the better argument, not what way of thinking is the most popular. For example, Dr. Sarah Hallberg's arguments and advice are way better than anything you'd read about from Harvard (which is still telling people saturated fat is bad).
Leak Exposes Members of Peter Thiel’s Secretive ‘Dialog’ Society
More than 200 of the world's elites registered for a retreat whose agenda runs from panels on cult-building and sex to prepping for World War III. An associated app offers matchmaking.
Energy costs are set by private energy companies, Phoenix. The actual cost of generating energy from renewables is significantly lower. The companies don't pass the saving onto the end user.
Right, but two posts ago I asked you to cite these supposed chief engineers, and I'm still waiting.
Yes, and your source was using government data that excluded several forms of subsidy that favour fossil fuels, as i already explained.
Works out for you, maybe, according to a narrow short-term perspective; that's how selfishness works. The changing climate doesn't work out so well for island nations, those in the path of worsening natural disasters, future generations, or hundreds of other species facing extinction.
I mean, is this radically different than something like Bohemian Grove, other than Peter Thiel being at the head of it?Uhuh, seems like a fun little club.Leak Exposes Members of Peter Thiel’s Secretive ‘Dialog’ Society
More than 200 of the world's elites registered for a retreat whose agenda runs from panels on cult-building and sex to prepping for World War III. An associated app offers matchmaking.www.wired.com
A significant amount of energy produced by renewables is wasted.
She said exactly what the chief engineer said in the article about inverters.
You did not disprove renewables get more subsidies than fossil fuels.
I go after the root cause of things and most people don't.
And as has already been explained to you, much more of the energy generated from fossil fuels is wasted.
You mean the article that explained exactly how the problem has been overcome? You may not have read it properly; it wouldn't be the first time.
I provided a source for the wildly high subsidies incurred by fossil fuels. And explained how many of them favour fossil fuels much more than they do renewables.
if you think renewables incur the same/more, at this point its on you to pony up. Because we have zero sources showing an equivalent number for them.
You go for whatever satisfies your pre-existing assumptions and prejudices, and don't give a toss about anyone else.
The name is cool but the building is not. Brutalism is fit only as headquarters of a torture happy secret service, or a Sith lord.
Brutalism is like any art form: it can be done well and be magnificent, or done badly and be awful.
I kind of like it. At best, it looked futuristic, space age (now retro space age); some of it is genuinely interesting and attractive. In design ethos, I think it had an admirable element of community and equality. No wonder it fell out of favour with an increasing individualist, atomised society.